Case law

Kaler v. Brown

101 Cal. App. 2d 716 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1951

They rely upon the rule stated in Stoner v. … As stated in Peck v.

People v. Brown

91 Cal. App. 4th 623 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 2001

v. … (People v. Soto, supra, 21 Cal.4th at p. 539 .) From this, Brown apparently concludes Recommendation 4.1 only endorses the product rule. The problem with Brown’s stance is threefold.

Brown v. Rainville

67 Cal. App. 2d 800 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 5, 1945

Brown of Los Angeles, Calif, the sum of Three Thousand ($3,000.00) Dollars, inherited by me from the estate of my father, Samuel Newton Cline, and I direct that this sum be paid before any other bequest hereinafter made. … *805 present in the instant case, viz., that the testator intended to make an unconditional gift in the nature of a general legacy, and secondly, the bequest indicates the fund out of which the legacy is payable (Maxim v.

Brown v. Wilson

89 Cal. App. 764 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 1928

Jaques deeds now held in Brown-Wilson escrow No. 11306.” Defendant thereupon received the $50 and Mr. Jaques (plaintiff’s attorney) received the deeds. … (Los Angeles City High School District v. Quinn, 195 Cal. 377 [ 234 Pac. 313 ].)

Brown v. Lamb

83 Cal. App. 187 · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 1927

Brown, the sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) cash, on or before October 1st, 1921. “Lee Koeingheim, “Stacy C. Lamb.” … (Beckwith v. Sheldon, 168 Cal. 742, 745 [Ann. Cas. 1916A, 963, 145 Pac. 97 ] and cases cited.)

Brown v. Fix

86 Cal. App. 3d 809 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 28, 1978

Defendant Josephine Fix was granted a summary judgment against plaintiff Gloria Jean Brown. Plaintiff appeals the judgment. … In Walker v.

Santos v. Brown

California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 2015

No. 34201100095413) v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., AS GOVERNOR, ETC., et al. Defendants and Respondents. … Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 415, 432; Silvers v. State Board of Equalization (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 1215, 1219.)

People v. Brown

203 Cal. App. 3d 1335 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1988

(People v. Robles (1970) 2 Cal.3d 205, 215 [ 85 Cal.Rptr. 166 , 466 P.2d 710 ]; People v. Blye (1965) 233 Cal.App.2d 143, 149 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 231 ].) But a defendant does not have a right to testify falsely. (Nix v. … (People v. Lucky (1988) 45 Cal.3d 259, 282 [ 247 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 753 P.2d 1052 ]; People v. *1341 Williams, supra, 2 Cal.3d at p. 905; People v. Robles, supra, 2 Cal. 3d at p. 215.)

Miller v. Brown

107 Cal. App. 2d 304 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 7, 1951

The case of Pike v. Zadig, 171 Cal. 273 [ 152 P. 923 ], upon which appellant relies does not sustain him. … (Pike v. Zadig, 171 Cal. 273 [ 152 P. 923 ].)

Brown v. State

21 Cal. App. 4th 1500 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1993

(Yox v. … (Klopping v. City of Whittier (1972) 8 Cal.3d 39, 43 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 500 P.2d 1345 ].) 4 Brown’s extensive quotations from Rose v.

Fowler v. Brown

125 Cal. App. 2d 450 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1954

Brown were owners of real property in Long Beach. … In support of this, appellant cites Dyke v.

Brown v. Mortensen

181 Cal. App. 4th 789 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 2010

The Browns rely on Credit Data of Arizona, Inc. v. State of Ariz. (9th Cir. 1979) 602 F.2d 195 , Davenport v. Farmers Ins. Group (8th Cir. 2004) 378 F.3d 839 , and Cisneros v. U.D. … (See Gorman v.

Bastajian v. Brown

57 Cal. App. 2d 910 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1943

(Bastajian v. Brown, 19 Cal.2d 209 [ 120 P.2d 9 ].) Thereafter the court filed the findings and judgment from which the present appeal is prosecuted. After the trial of the action Mrs. … (Baldwin v. American Trading Co., 76 Cal.App. 80 [ 243 P. 710 ]; Deming v. Smith, 19 Cal.App.2d 683 [ 66 P.2d 454 ]; Watson v. Edwards, 105 Cal. 70 [ 38 P. 527 ]; Phelan v.

People v. Brown

169 Cal. App. 3d 159 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 1985

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. Robert E. Brown appeals from a judgment entered upon a plea of guilty to robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). … Terry v.

Oliphant v. Brown

7 Cal. App. 2d 584 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1935

(W agy v. Brave, 133 Cal. App. 413 [ 24 Pac. (2d) 209 ].) … (Burgesser v. Bullock’s, 190 Cal. 673 [ 214 Pac. 649 ]; Filson v. Balkins, 206 Cal. 209 [ 273 Pac. 578 ]; Maggart v. Bell, 116 Cal. App. 306 [ 2 Pac. (2d) 516 ].)

Brown v. Berman

203 Cal. App. 2d 327 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1962

Upon the basis that ''[e] quitable principles apply in a quiet title action” (Talbot v. … One entering under a claim of right is a mere intruder or trespasser (Kimball v. Lohmas, 31 Cal. 154, 159 ), without any bona fide belief in his title (2 *330 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law 876).

Brown v. Aldrich

77 Cal. App. 2d 693 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1947

(Bayless v. Mull, supra, at page 75.) , The case of Bradford v. … (De Young v.

Brown v. Butler

3 Cal. App. 2d 11 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1934

Hatton, 195 Cal. 132, 146 [ 231 Pac. 987 ]; Victor Oil Co. v. Drum, 184 Cal. 226, 239-242 [ 193 Pac. 243 ]; Nichols v. Moore, 181 Cal. 131, 132 [ 183 Pac. 531 ]; Galusha v. Fraser, 178 Cal. 653, 657 [ 174 Pac. 311 ]. … (Allen v. Stellar, 106 Cal. App. 67 [ 288 Pac. 855 ]; Smith v. Bentson, 127 Cal. App. (Supp.) 789 [ 15 Pac. (2d) 910 ]; Hansen v. Carr, 73 Cal. App. 511 [ 238 Pac. 1048 ].) The judgment is affirmed.

Brown v. Cobb

63 Cal. App. 533 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 1923

In the case of Moultrie v. … In the case of Curtin v.

Brown v. Stevens

78 Cal. App. 2d 194 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 20, 1947