Case law

Kashian v. Harriman

120 Cal. Rptr. 2d 576 · California Court of Appeal · May 23, 2002

(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 727 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 708 , 771 P.2d 406 ]; see also Lunquist v. Reusser, supra, 7 Cal.4th 1193.) … (Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co., supra, 48 Cal.3d at p. 723, fn. 7 .)

People v. Brown

198 Cal. App. 2d 232 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1961

As stated in People v. … “Defendant Brown: No. “Defendant Hadnot: No, sir.” *237 The plea of guilty is an admission of defendants’ guilt and every element of the offense charged and is a conclusive admission of guilt. (People v.

People v. Brown

225 Cal. App. 3d 585 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1990

In O’Hare v. … (People v.

People v. Brown

259 Cal. App. 2d 663 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 29, 1968

Brown, Tony Catón, Cora Craddock, Charlie Fleming, John M. Fleming, Lorene Fleming, Hable C. Haley, John HeGuwan, Johnnie Price, Erenthia V. Woolfolk, Bessie H. … In the' cigar store at 8462% South Central, the officers found Charles Brown and Johnnie Price. When the officers entered, Brown was talking on the telephone and writing on a piece of cigarette paper.

Brown v. Nelson

110 Cal. App. 561 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1930

People v. Brown

83 Cal. App. 236 · California Court of Appeal · May 20, 1927

D. 1926, in the employ of the police department of the city of Oakland as an operative; that at about 9 o’clock on that evening he met the appellant Hazel Brown at the corner of Third and Lewis Streets in the city of Oakland … (People v. Suesser, 142 Cal. 354 [ 75 Pac. 1093 ]; People v. Rodley, 131 Cal. 240, 251, 252 [ 63 Pac. 351 ].) We think the point is not well taken.

Brown v. Oshiro

68 Cal. App. 2d 393 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1945

(See Brown v. Oshiro (1943), 58 Cal.App.2d 190 [ 136 P.2d 29 ].) The plaintiffs have since filed an amended and supplemental complaint and defendant has filed an answer thereto. … Groninger (1936), 12 Cal.App.2d 603 [ 55 P.2d 940 ] ; Davidson v. Goldstein (1943), 58 Cal.App.2d Supp. 909 [ 136 P.2d 665 ] ; Burke v. San Francisco Breweries, Ltd. (1913), 21 Cal.App. 198 [ 131 P. 83 ] ; Byrnes v.

Brown v. Panish

99 Cal. App. 3d 429 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 6, 1979

Respondents Brown et al. are the majority of limited partners, who voted at a duly noticed meeting of the partnership June 1, 1977, to remove and replace the general partner, C & W Associates, Inc. … Bank v. Wagner, 265 Cal.App.2d 868, 874-875 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 832 ]; Advising Cal. Partnerships (Cont.Ed.Bar 1975) § 1.4, pp.3-4.)

Brown v. Campos

108 Cal. App. 4th 839 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 2003

David Campos (husband) filed an order to show cause for modification of the child custody and visitation order relating to his sons, ages 15 and 12, after their mother, Linda Brown (wife), announced she would move with the … (Burchard v. Garay [(1986)] 42 Cal.3d [531,] 535 [ 229 Cal.Rptr.2d 800 , 724 P.2d 486 ].)” (Id. at p. 38.)

People v. Brown

204 Cal. App. 3d 1444 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1988

People v. … Brown contends he was unlawfully entrapped by an FBI agent and an informant.

Brown v. Guy

170 Cal. App. 2d 256 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1959

This order was affirmed (Brown v. … We had occasion to comment on the type of record thus presented when defendant unsuccessfully moved to dismiss the appeal for noncompliance with the applicable rules (Brown v. Guy, 167 Cal.App.2d 211 [ 334 P.2d 67 ]).

Warden v. Brown

185 Cal. App. 2d 626 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1960

Brownfield v. Brown

54 Cal. App. 3d 840 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 1976

. * This appeal is from a judgment declaring Deanna, a little girl, born December 22, 1968, free from the custody and control of her natural mother, objector and appellant Margaret Joyce Brown. … (Stanley v. Illinois, supra, 405 U.S. 645 at p. 652 [ 31 L.Ed.2d at p. 559 ]; italics added.)

People v. Brown

6 Cal. App. 3d 619 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1970

There must exist either a physical impossibility his statements are true or their falsity must be apparent without resorting to inferences or deductions (People v. Huston, 21 Cal.2d 690, 693 [ 134 P.2d 758 ]; People v. … (See People v. Watson, 46 Cal.2d 818, 837-838 [ 299 P.2d 243 ].)

Mitchel v. Brown

78 Cal. App. 2d 58 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1947

On appeal (Mitchel v. … (California Packing Corp. v. Larsen, 187 Cal. 610 [ 203 P. 102 ]; Martin v. Stone, 15 Cal.App. 174 [ 113 P. 706 ]; Bridges v. Price, 95 Cal.App. 394 [ 273 P. 72 ].)

Wheeler v. Brown

47 Cal. App. 2d 239 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 9, 1941

(Clary v. Lindley, 30 Cal. App. (2d) 571 [ 86 Pac. (2d) 920 ].) … (Mar Shee v. Maryland Assur. Corp., 190 Cal. 1, 9 [ 210 Pac. 269 ].)

People v. Brown

184 Cal. App. 2d 588 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 14, 1960

(See Lisenba v. California, 314 U.S. 219, 236 [ 62 S.Ct. 280, 290 , 86 L.Ed. 166, 180 ]; People v. Collins, supra, 117 Cal.App.2d 175, 181 .) The search of Brown’s house was perfectly proper under the circumstances. … In People v.

Brown v. Volz

90 Cal. App. 2d 793 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1949

Brown got ill, I didn’t think Mrs. … Code, §§ 1577, 1578; Rued v. Cooper, 119 Cal. 463 [51 P. 704]; Hannah v. Steinman, 159 Cal. 142 [ 112 P. 1094 ]; Spear v. Farwell, 5 Cal.App.2d 111 [ 42 P.2d 391 ].)

People v. Brown

222 Cal. App. 2d 739 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 1963

(People v. Pendarvis, 189 Cal.App.2d 180 [ 10 Cal.Rptr. 923 ]; People v. Martinez, 180 Cal.App.2d 690 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 829 ]; People v. Pongetti, 72 Cal.App.2d 749 [ 165 P.2d 479 ].) … Williams, 27 Cal.2d 220 [ 163 P.2d 692 ]; People v. Stinson, 214 Cal.App.2d 476 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 695 ]); People v. Bagley, 208 Cal.App.2d 482 [ 25 Cal.Rptr. 340 ]; People v.

People v. Brown

207 Cal. App. 3d 1541 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1989

In Franks v. … (Franks v. Delaware, supra, 438 U.S. at pp. 171-172 [ 57 L.Ed.2d at p. 682 ]; People v. Crabb, supra, a 394.)