Case law

People v. Brown

169 Cal. App. 3d 800 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1985

Four eyewitnesses positively identified appellant, Yvonne Lindo Brown, as the bank robber. … In People v.

People v. Brown

136 Cal. App. 2d 244 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 1955

That the error does not call for a reversal see: People v. Vatek, 71 Cal.App. 453, 469 [ 236 P. 163 ] ; People v. O’Moore, 83 Cal.App.2d 586, 601 [ 189 P.2d 554 ]. … The case is in line with People v.

Thompson v. Brown

75 Cal. App. 2d 344 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1946

The resignation was accepted by the board on May 11, 1936, and on the following day plaintiff addressed to each member of the board a letter in which he rescinded and withdrew his resignation and requested the board to rescind … (People v. Marsh, 30 Cal.App. 424 [ 159 P. 191 ].)

Brown v. Cardoza

67 Cal. App. 2d 187 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1944

Peoples Mortgage Co., 130 Cal.App. 632 [ 20 P.2d 335 ]; McCarty v. Mellinkoff, 118 Cal.App. 11 [ 4 P.2d 595 ]; Baker v. Butcher, 106 Cal.App. 358 [ 289 P. 236 ]; O. A. Graybeal Co. v. … (Jameson v. Warren, 91 Cal.App. 590 [ 267 P. 372 ]; Rice v. Dunlap, 205 Cal. 133 [ 270 P. 196 ]; Richlin v. Schleimer, 120 Cal.App. 40 [ 7 P.2d 711 ]; Wilbur v.

Brown v. Murphy

36 Cal. App. 2d 171 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1939

Admitting the foregoing statements and letters, Brown stated that he never intended to lease the Gold Chief property. … Such entry must always be peaceable, open and above board, and made in good faith (italics ours), or no right can be founded upon it.” See, also, Tweedy v. Parsons, 217 Cal. 447, 450 [ 19 Pac. (2d) 497 ]; Lind v.

People v. Brown

168 Cal. App. 2d 549 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1959

In People v. … (See People v. Raleigh, supra; People v. Sanders, supra; People v. Peete, supra; People v. Sykes, supra.)

Brown v. Monroe

61 Cal. App. 282 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 6, 1923

It appears that a case entitled Louis Armelin and Alice Armelin, His Wife, v. … (E state of Keating, 158 Cal. 113 [ 110 Pac. 109 ]; Fiske v. Gosbey, 168 Cal. 334 [ 143 Pac. 611 ].)

People v. Brown

110 Cal. App. 3d 24 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 4, 1980

Code, § 1235; People v. Chavez (1980) 26 Cal.3d 334 [ 161 Cal.Rptr. 762 , 605 P.2d 401 ]; People v. Green (1971) 3 Cal.3d 981, 988-989 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 494 , 479 P.2d 998 ]; People v. … V.

Brown v. Cranston

214 Cal. App. 2d 660 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1963

The case of First Federal Sav. & Loan Assn. of Hollywood v. State Board, of Control, 53 Cal.App.2d 391 [ 128 P.2d 75 ], involved a claim for the refund of certain taxes. … (California Toll Bridge Authority v. Kuchel, 40 Cal.2d 43, 53 [ 251 P.2d 4 ]; County of Alameda v. Kuchel, 32 Cal.2d 193, 199 [ 195 P.2d 17 ]; Dickey v.

Brown v. Howard

86 Cal. App. 532 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1927

{Bank of United States v. Bank of Washington, 6 Pet. (U. S.) 19 [ 8 L. Ed. 299 ].) … {Rickert v. Pollock, 46 Misc. Rep. 275 [ 92 N. Y. Supp. 89 ].)

People v. Brown

35 Cal. App. 4th 708 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1995

(People v. Davis, supra, 8 Cal.App.4th at p. 44 ; see also State v. … Therefore, the jury was not required to unanimously agree on its theory of malice in finding Brown guilty of second degree murder. (See generally; State v.

Brown v. Rahman

231 Cal. App. 3d 1458 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1991

In Blackwell v. … In Aguilar v.

Halleck v. Brown

164 Cal. App. 2d 586 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1958

(Martz v. Ruiz, 158 Cal.App.2d 590 [322 P.2d 981]; Britton v. Gunderson, 160 Cal.App.2d 66 [ 324 P.2d 938 ]; Brenner v. Beardsley, 159 Cal.App.2d 304 [ 323 P.2d 841 ]; Emerton v. Acres, 160 Cal. … App.2d 742 [ 325 P.2d 685 ]; Grant v. Mueller, 160 Cal.App. 2d 804 [ 325 P.2d 680 ].)

Brown v. Jernigan

74 Cal. App. 524 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 1925

A like problem was presented in Von Der Kuhlen v. Cline, 38 Cal. … See, also, Baines v.

People v. Brown

17 Cal. App. 4th 1389 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1993

(People v. Sully (1991) 53 Cal.3d 1195, 1224 [ 283 Cal.Rptr. 144 , 812 P.2d 163 ]; People v. Gallego (1990) 52 Cal.3d 115, 171 [ 276 Cal.Rptr. 679 , 802 P.2d 169 ].) … (See People v. Tassell, supra, 36 Cal.3d 77 ; People v. Pitts, supra, 223 Cal.App.3d 606, 835 ; People v. Key (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 888, 894 [ 203 Cal.Rptr. 144 ].)

Smith v. Brown

1 Cal. App. 2d 492 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1934

resulting therefrom where he has assumed and agreed to pay the debt, and that his promise to pay may be established by appropriate language in the deed to him, by an independent writing or by a verbal contract (Fishback v. … The escrow holder was also the agent of Brown and the agent’s knowledge of the change in the contract must be imputed to the principal (Early v. Owens, 109 Cal. App. 489 [ 293 Pac. 136 ]).

People v. Brown

216 Cal. App. 3d 596 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1989

Frank Edward Brown appeals from the judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of vehicular manslaughter (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. … None of the changes affect the case at bench. 2 People v.

People v. Brown

138 Cal. App. 3d 832 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1982

{People v. Hitch, supra, 12 Cal.3d 641, 645 .) People v. … {United States v.

Wilson v. Brown

187 Cal. App. 4th 400 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 2010

(Grider v. Keystone Health Plan Central, Inc. (3d Cir. 2009) 580 F.3d 119, 141 ; Insurance Benefit Administrators, Inc. v. Martin (7th Cir. 1989) 871 F.2d 1354, 1360 ; Apex Oil Co. v. … (Insurance Benefit Administrators, Inc. v. Martin, supra, 871 F.2d at p. 1360; Apex Oil Co. v. Belcher Co. of New York, supra, 855 F.2d at pp. 1014-1015.)

People v. Brown

225 Cal. App. 3d 585 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1990

In O’Hare v. … (People v.