Case law

Brown v. Roberts

121 Cal. App. 654 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1932

The bank notified the parties about this bond and plaintiff William Brown discussed the matter with defendant Roberts and offered to pay the bond off or to let defendant Roberts assume it. … (Tuso v. Green, 194 Cal. 574 [ 229 Pac. 327 ] ; Hansen v. Hevener, 69 Cal. App. 337 [ 231 Pac. 361 ].)

Brown v. Brashear

22 Cal. App. 135 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1913

(See Niosi v. Empire Steam Laundry, 117 Cal. 257 , [ 49 Pac. 185 ], and decisions therein referred to.)

People v. Brown

137 Cal. App. 2d 138 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 18, 1955

Ellen Brown, a widow, was employed by Mary Hile and her husband, Harvey, in 1951 for compensation on a daily basis. … Ellen Brown,” and stamped “J. T. O’Neill.”

People v. Brown

61 Cal. App. 574 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 6, 1923

(People v. Eppinger, 105 Cal. 36 [ 38 Pac. 538 ].)

Brown v. Coffee

17 Cal. App. 381 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 7, 1911

(Netterstrom v. Gallistel, 110 111. App. 352.) … (Gerrish v. Maher, 70 Ill. 470 ; 31 Cyc. of Law & Proc. 1644; Lawrence v. Johnson, 64 Ill. 351 .).

Galli v. Brown

110 Cal. App. 2d 764 · California Court of Appeal · May 7, 1952

(Welsh v. Bramlet, 98 Cal. 219 [ 33 P. 66 ]; Payne v. Murphy, 18 Cal.App. 446 [123 P. 350 ]; Pratt v. Browne, 135 Cal. 649 [ 67 P. 1082 ]; City of Pasadena v. Stimson, 91 Cal. 238 [ 27 P. 604 ]; Chitwood v. … (County of Santa Barbara v. Janssens, 177 Cal. 114 [ 169 P. 1025 , L.R.A. 1918C 558 ]; Merriam v. Board of Supervisors, 72 Cal. 517 [ 14 P. 137 ].)

People v. Brown

226 Cal. App. 3d 1361 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 1991

(People v. Cockrell (1965) 63 Cal.2d 659, 667 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 788 , 408 P.2d 116 ]; People v. Bratis (1977) 73 Cal.App.3d 751, 765 [ 141 Cal.Rptr. 45 ]; People v. … In People v.

McAllister v. Brown

114 Cal. App. 239 · California Court of Appeal · May 20, 1931

(Manwell v. Durst, 178 Cal. 752 [1 A. L. R. 669, 174 Pac. 881 ].) It must appear from the facts averred that negligence caused or contributed to the injury. … (Stephenson v. Southern Pac. Co., 102 Cal. 147 [ 34 Pac. 620 , 36 Pac. 407 ]; Stein v. United R. Co., 159 Cal. 370 [ 113 Pac. 663 ]; Smith v. Buttner, 90 Cal. 99 [ 27 Pac. 29 ].)

People v. Brown

1 Cal. App. 3d 161 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 23, 1969

Thus, in People v. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Coughlin, J., concurred.

Marshall v. Brown

141 Cal. App. 3d 408 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1983

Defendant Brown’s attitude towards plaintiff while in his employment was not the issue to be proved. Constitutionality of Statutory Treble Damages Applying Hale v. … In Greenberg v.

Brown v. Sandell

79 Cal. App. 313 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 1926

(Pratt v. Stevens, 94 N. Y. 387, 392 ; Hambel v. Lowry, 264 Mo. 168 [ 174 S. W. 405, 406 ].) … Appellant cites People v. Mulcahy, 159 Cal. 34 [ 112 Pac. 853 ], as holding that the affidavit is insufficient.

People v. Brown

42 Cal. App. 4th 1493 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1996

Finally, in People v. … Notwithstanding People v.

Brown v. Rives

42 Cal. App. 482 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 1919

Under the holding of this court in Anderson v. Aronsohn, 28 Cal.App. … As was said *Page 488 in the case of Anderson v. Aronsohn, supra: "The case of Joost v. Craig, 131 Cal. 504 , [ 82 Am. St.

People v. Brown

43 Cal. App. 2d 430 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 12, 1941

(People v. Methever, 132 Cal. 326 [ 64 Pac. 481 ].) … App. 705 [ 283 Pac. 821 ]; see, also, People v. Lazarus, 207 Cal. 507 [ 279 Pac. 145 ] ; People v. Leong Fook, 206 Cal. 64 [ 273 Pac. 779 ].)

People v. Brown

198 Cal. App. 2d 253 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1961

Thus in People v. … Again in People v.

People v. Brown

150 Cal. App. 3d 968 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1984

In stating the relevant evidence, we follow the rules laid down in People v. Johnson (1980) 26 Cal.3d 557, 576-577 [ 162 Cal.Rptr. 431 , 606 P.2d *970 738, 16 A.L.R.4th 1255 ], and Grainger v. … Concluding that the trial court properly applied Evidence Code section 1235 and the rule of People v. Green, supra, 3 Cal.3d 981 , we discern no merit in Brown’s instant contention.

Sanker v. Brown

167 Cal. App. 3d 1144 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1985

Declarations filed by Brown and his attorney supported Brown’s contentions. Brown testified, “. . . … Discussion While this appeal was pending our Supreme Court handed down its decision in Blanton v.

Armstrong v. Brown

12 Cal. App. 2d 22 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 19, 1936

Brown was County Clerk of Sutter County. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company became his surety on his official bond. … Brown keep that certificate of deposit.” Upon this record, in support of the findings and judgment, we must assume that Mrs. Armstrong did authorise their attorneys to so instruct the clerk.

Pizer v. Brown

133 Cal. App. 2d 367 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1955

(Brown v. Hook, 79 Cal.App.2d 781, 795 [ 180 P.2d 982 ].) … In Brown v.

People v. Brown

79 Cal. App. 3d 649 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1978

Defendant Brown contends before us that the testimony elicited from Sergeant Fritz constitutes inadmissible hearsay and a violation of People v. … In place of the prejudicial-per-se error (Bruton v.