Case law

Aroney v. California Horse Racing Board

145 Cal. App. 3d 928 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1983

As was observed in Cameron v. … The Board’s power to exclude persons on the basis of status or past conduct from a place of amusement open to the public (Epstein v.

Block v. Board of Police Commissioners

110 Cal. App. 2d 67 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1952

(Cooperative Junk Co. v. Police Commrs., 38 Cal.App. 676, 679 [ 177 P. 308 ].) … The credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given the evidence were matters for the determination of the board. (Southern Calif. Jockey Club v.

Marcus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

35 Cal. App. 3d 598 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 27, 1973

It is clear that whatever contempt powers the board may have are provided in Labor Code sections 133 and 134 (Loustalot v. Superior Court, supra, p. 908). … or any member thereof,” and is a power which may not be delegated by the appeals board to a referee (see Burns v.

Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

212 Cal. App. 4th 78 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 2012

(Container Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board (1983) 463 U.S. 159, 184 [ 77 L.Ed.2d 545 , 103 S.Ct. 2933 ].) … Nortel Networks Inc. v. Board of Equalization In Nortel, the plaintiff sold telephone switching equipment and licensed the software used to operate the equipment. (Nortel Networks Inc. v.

McLaughlin v. Board of Medical Examiners

35 Cal. App. 3d 1010 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1973

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301, 308-309 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; Grannis v. Board of Medical Examiners, 19 Cal.App.3d 551, 563 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 863 ].) … (Grannis v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 19 Cal.App.3d 551, 563-564 .)

Rinaldo v. Board of Medical Examiners

93 Cal. App. 72 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 3, 1928

With one exception, to wit: that relating to the defense of “res judicata,” the points presented by appellant herein for a reversal of the judgment are identical with those urged in the case of Dyment v. … board was without jurisdiction to make the order of which complaint is made. *73 Belying upon the authority of the said case of Dyment v.

Gillette v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

20 Cal. App. 3d 312 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1971

In Michon v. Workmen's Comp. App. … Brown and Dr. McHenry. The carrier cites Franklin v. Workmen's Comp.

Truesdale v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

190 Cal. App. 3d 608 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1987

And we recognize the nature of such relationships is generally a factual one for the board. (Germann v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 776, 782 [ 176 Cal.Rptr. 868 ].) … Nevertheless, where the facts would support but one conclusion, the issue is a legal one and a contrary finding by the board is not sustainable. (Perguica v. Ind. Acc.

Veilleux v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

175 Cal. App. 3d 235 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 1985

Mathews v. Eldridge (1976) 424 U.S. 319 [ 47 L.Ed.2d 18 , 96 S.Ct. 893 ], upon which the Board relies, is distinguishable from the facts of the instant case. … Since the Board’s decision rescinding the WCJ’s finding and award of the penalty was erroneous as a matter of law on the undisputed facts, its decision must be annulled. (See Perez v. Workers’ Comp.

Board of Education v. Common Council

1 Cal. App. 311 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 13, 1905

(Board of Education v. Common Council, 128 Cal. 372 , [ 60 Pac. 976 ].) … (Johnson v. Malley, 74 Cal. 432 , [ 16 Pac. 228 ].)

First Western Bank & Trust Co. v. Brown

199 Cal. App. 2d 274 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 18, 1962

and Keith Brown.” … Herbert, 186 Md. 453 [ 47 A.2d 360, 364 [7]]; Davis v. Mitchell, 27 Tenn.App. 182 [ 178 S.W.2d 889, 904 [24-26]]; Cooper v.

Knorp v. Board of Police Commissioners

31 Cal. App. 539 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1916

(Kellogg v. Cochran, 87 Cal. 192 , [12 L. R. A. 104, 25 Pac. 677 ].) The case of Aldrich v. Barton, 153 Cal. 488 , [ 95 Pac. 900 ] has no application to the facts of the present case. … Proc., secs. 352, 338, 343; Farrell v. Board of Police Commrs., 1 Cal. App. 5 , [ 81 Pac. 674 ]; Jones v. Board of Police Commrs., 141 Cal. 96 , [ 74 Pac. 696 ] ; Dodge v. Board of Police Commrs., 1 Cal.

Azadigian v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

7 Cal. App. 4th 372 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 1992

(Dow Chemical Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1967) 67 Cal.2d 483, 491 [ 62 Cal.Rptr. 757 , 432 P.2d 365 ]; Dakins v. Board of Pension Commissioners (1982) 134 Cal. App. 3d 374, 381 [ 184 Cal.Rptr. 576 ]; Solari v. … Co. of New York v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 1001, 1012 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 339 ].) Without such proof, the board has no power to disturb its prior ruling. (Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Indus. A.

Costa v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 289 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 1998

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 180 .) … (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at pp. 180-181.)

Sarabi v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

60 Cal. Rptr. 3d 189 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2007

Co. v. Workers’ Comp. … (Ruffin v.

Sica v. Board of Police Commissioners

200 Cal. App. 2d 137 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1962

(Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, 52 Cal.2d 259, 264 [ 341 P.2d 291 ] ; McDonough v. … Department of Corrections, 110 Cal.App.2d 331 [ 242 P.2d 906 ] ; Garfield v. Board of Medical Examiners, 99 Cal.App.2d 219 [ 221 P.2d 705 ] ; Sobo v. Board of Police Comrs., 145 Cal.App.2d 783 [ 303 P.2d 104 ] ; King v.

Schoenen v. Board of Medical Examiners

245 Cal. App. 2d 909 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 1966

(Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, 21 Cal.2d 790 [ 136 P.2d 304 ] ; Russell v. Miller, 21 Cal.2d 817 [ 136 P.2d 318 ] ; Sipper v. Urban, 22 Cal.2d 138 [ 137 P.2d 425 ].) … (Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, at p. 799; Id., at pp. 805-809 (concurring and dissenting opinion of Traynor, J.); Ashdown v. State of Calif.

Moser v. State Board of Education

22 Cal. App. 3d 988 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 19, 1972

In Board of Trustees v. … Goldsmith v. Board of Education, 66 Cal.App. 157, 168 [ 225 P. 783 ], quoted in Board of Education v.

Duncan v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

166 Cal. App. 4th 294 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 26, 2008

(Davison v. Industrial Acc. … Fund v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1998) 18 Cal.4th 1209, 1214, fn. 3 [ 77 Cal.Rptr.2d 528 , 959 P.2d 1204 ]; Christian v. Workers’ Comp.

Carver v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

217 Cal. App. 3d 1539 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 20, 1990

Co. v. California Ins. … Co. v. California Ins.