Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.96s
Royster v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
40 Cal. App. 3d 412 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1974
This rule is expressed in Young v. Industrial Acc. … If, therefore, the statement which the commission quotes from Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Industrial Acc.
Cited 8 timesPublishedMacCracken v. Board of Medical Examiners
24 Cal. App. 2d 58 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 1937
(Standard Oil Co. of California v. State Board of Equalization, 6 Cal. (2d) 557 [ 59 Pac. (2d) 119 ]; Whitten v. State Board of Optometry, 8 Cal. (2d) 444 [ 65 Pac. (2d) 1296 ].) … (O’Donnell v. Board of Medical Examiners of Calif., 22 Cal. App. (2d) 80 [ 70 Pac. (2d) 246 ].)
Cited 4 timesPublishedWilson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
196 Cal. App. 3d 902 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 3, 1987
On those, the court is not bound by the Board’s *905 decision. (Dimmig v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1972) 6 Cal.3d 860, 864-865 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 105 , 495 P.2d 433 ].) … The court in Ezzy v. Workers’ Comp.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSautter v. Contractors' State License Board
124 Cal. App. 2d 149 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1954
(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; Manning v. Watson, 108 Cal.App.2d 705, 712 [ 239 P.2d 688 ].) … (Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].) It may be said here as was said in Norwood v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedVan Hook v. Board of Retirement
148 Cal. App. 3d 714 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 1983
Such costs should be assessed against the board, shall be considered a cost of administration, and shall in no event become a personal liability of any member of the board.” … In this form, the bill passed but was vetoed by then Governor Brown. In the following session a similar bill was introduced (Sen.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMarcus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
35 Cal. App. 3d 598 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 27, 1973
It is clear that whatever contempt powers the board may have are provided in Labor Code sections 133 and 134 (Loustalot v. Superior Court, supra, p. 908). … or any member thereof,” and is a power which may not be delegated by the appeals board to a referee (see Burns v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedBeach v. Contractors State License Board
151 Cal. App. 2d 117 · California Court of Appeal · May 17, 1957
On November 3, 1955, the Contractors State License Board found that appellant, Manly L. … As said in Ashdown v. State of Calif.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNeufeld v. State Board of Equalization
22 Cal. Rptr. 3d 423 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 2004
FCC v. … (Franklet v.
Disapproved on other grounds by Ryan v. Rosenfeld, 218 Cal. Rptr. 3d 654 (2017)Cited 9 timesPublishedColtherd v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
225 Cal. App. 3d 455 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1990
Introduction Elsie Coltherd (petitioner), the widow of employee Brian Coltherd, has petitioned this court to review a decision and order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granting claimant and respondent St … (Prudential Insurance Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1978) 22 Cal.3d 776, 780 [ 151 Cal.Rptr. 537 , 588 P.2d 239 ]; Ogdon v. Workmen’s Comp.
Cited 7 timesPublishedAzadigian v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
7 Cal. App. 4th 372 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 1992
(Dow Chemical Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1967) 67 Cal.2d 483, 491 [ 62 Cal.Rptr. 757 , 432 P.2d 365 ]; Dakins v. Board of Pension Commissioners (1982) 134 Cal. App. 3d 374, 381 [ 184 Cal.Rptr. 576 ]; Solari v. … Co. of New York v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 1001, 1012 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 339 ].) Without such proof, the board has no power to disturb its prior ruling. (Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Indus. A.
Cited 15 timesPublishedMeyer v. State Land Settlement Board
104 Cal. App. 577 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1930
Union v. … Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBeauchamp v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
259 Cal. App. 2d 147 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 19, 1968
In Burnight v. Industrial Acc. … Beauchamp’s personality that eventuated in his death. ’ ’ 2 In addition to the authorities discussed by the court in Burnight v. Industrial Acc. Com., 181 Cal.App.2d 816 [ 5 Cal.Rptr. 786 ], see also: Annot.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSica v. Board of Police Commissioners
200 Cal. App. 2d 137 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1962
(Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, 52 Cal.2d 259, 264 [ 341 P.2d 291 ] ; McDonough v. … Department of Corrections, 110 Cal.App.2d 331 [ 242 P.2d 906 ] ; Garfield v. Board of Medical Examiners, 99 Cal.App.2d 219 [ 221 P.2d 705 ] ; Sobo v. Board of Police Comrs., 145 Cal.App.2d 783 [ 303 P.2d 104 ] ; King v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedRinaldo v. Board of Medical Examiners
93 Cal. App. 72 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 3, 1928
With one exception, to wit: that relating to the defense of “res judicata,” the points presented by appellant herein for a reversal of the judgment are identical with those urged in the case of Dyment v. … board was without jurisdiction to make the order of which complaint is made. *73 Belying upon the authority of the said case of Dyment v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedKnowles v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
10 Cal. App. 3d 1027 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 1970
Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com. … Thus in Ferris v. Industrial Acc.
Cited 10 timesPublishedKnorp v. Board of Police Commissioners
31 Cal. App. 539 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1916
(Kellogg v. Cochran, 87 Cal. 192 , [12 L. R. A. 104, 25 Pac. 677 ].) The case of Aldrich v. Barton, 153 Cal. 488 , [ 95 Pac. 900 ] has no application to the facts of the present case. … Proc., secs. 352, 338, 343; Farrell v. Board of Police Commrs., 1 Cal. App. 5 , [ 81 Pac. 674 ]; Jones v. Board of Police Commrs., 141 Cal. 96 , [ 74 Pac. 696 ] ; Dodge v. Board of Police Commrs., 1 Cal.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoard of Supervisors v. Superior Court
147 Cal. App. 3d 206 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 1983
(Cf., Stirling v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 48 Cal.App.3d 184, 189 .) … However, as revealed by the analysis in Driscoll v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedHarley-Davidson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board
237 Cal. App. 4th 193 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 2015
(Edison California Stores v. McColgan (1947) 30 Cal.2d 472, 481; Handlery v. Franchise Tax Board (1972) 26 Cal.App.3d 970, 973 (Handlery).) … Co. v.
Cited 34 timesPublishedPham v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
78 Cal. App. 4th 626 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 2000
Fund v. Brown (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 188, 199 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 98 ]; Western Electric Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 629, 644 [ 160 Cal.Rptr. 436 ].) … (See, e.g., Westside Produce Co. v. Workers’ Comp.
Cited 8 timesPublishedPetrocelli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
45 Cal. App. 3d 635 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1975
Applicant’s petition to the board for reconsideration was denied. … (See Garza v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1970) 3 Cal.3d 312, 317-318 [ 90 Cal.Rptr. 355 , 475 P.2d 451 ].) The issue is one of law.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna