Case law

Agnew v. State Board of Equalization

36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 464 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 2005

.”); Wertin v. … Co. v.

Bowen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 95 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1999

In Arriaga v. … In Laeng v. Workmen’s Comp.

Graham v. State Board of Control

33 Cal. App. 4th 253 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 21, 1995

(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 724 [257 *260 Cal.Rptr. 708, 771 P.2d 406 ].) In order to determine intent, we begin with the language of the statute itself. (Ibid.) … The Board has no power to adopt a regulation in conflict with or which alters or violates a statute. (§ 11342.2; California Welfare Rights Organization v.

Bowman v. Board of Pension Commissioners

155 Cal. App. 3d 937 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1984

(Brandt v. Board of Supervisors (1978) 84 Cal.App.3d *943 598, 600-601 [ 147 Cal.Rptr. 468 ].) … (Ford v. State of California (1981) 116 Cal.App.3d 507, 516 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 162 ]; quoting from Brown v. Newby (1940) 39 Cal.App.2d 615, 618 [ 103 P.2d 1018 ].)

McConnell v. Board of Supervisors

7 Cal. App. 385 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1908

McConnell v. … Respondent’s contention is that the action of the board of supervisors upon such hearing was judicial; upon that assumption the intendments in favor of the regularity *387 of the judgment of such board, nothing to the contrary

Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners

80 Cal. Rptr. 2d 317 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1998

(Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners (1998) 17 Cal.4th 763, 795 [ 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 624 , 952 P.2d 641 ].) We conclude the discipline imposed was well within the Board’s discretion and therefore affirm. … (Matanky v.

Negrete v. State Personnel Board

213 Cal. App. 3d 1160 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 16, 1989

(Brown v. State Personnel Bd. (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 1151, 1164, *1166 fn. 5 .) … (Brown v. State Personnel Bd., supra, 166 Cal.App.3d at p. 1164 , original italics.)

Beauchamp v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

259 Cal. App. 2d 147 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 19, 1968

In Burnight v. Industrial Acc. … Beauchamp’s personality that eventuated in his death. ’ ’ 2 In addition to the authorities discussed by the court in Burnight v. Industrial Acc. Com., 181 Cal.App.2d 816 [ 5 Cal.Rptr. 786 ], see also: Annot.

Marsh v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 2005

(Pullman Kellogg v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1980) 26 Cal.3d 450, 454 [ 161 Cal.Rptr. 783 , 605 P.2d 422 ]; Ballard v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1971) 3 Cal.3d 832, 837 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 478 P.2d 937 ]; Franklin v. … Code Regs., tit. 8, *914 § 10341; Gee v. Workers’ Comp.

Hofmeister v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

156 Cal. App. 3d 848 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1984

(Diaz v. Borchers Bros., Inc., supra, 43 Cal.Comp.Cases at p. 803.) … (Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El Segundo (1977) 19 Cal.3d 152, 155 [ 137 Cal.Rptr. 154 , 561 P.2d 244 ]; IGA Aluminum Products, Inc. v.

Chavira v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

235 Cal. App. 3d 463 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 21, 1991

Thorp, Inc. v. Workers’ Comp. … In Permanente Medical Group v. Workers’ Comp.

Knowles v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

10 Cal. App. 3d 1027 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 1970

Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com. … Thus in Ferris v. Industrial Acc.

Stone v. Board of Supervisors

205 Cal. App. 3d 927 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 1, 1988

Ayres v. City Council of Los Angeles (1949) 34 Cal.2d 31, 42 [ 207 P.2d 1 , 11 A.L.R.2d 503 ]; O’Hagen v. Board of Zoning Adjustment (1971) 19 Cal.App.3d 151, 158 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 484 ]; and Nollan v. … (Bowman v. City of Petaluma, supra, 185 Cal.App.3d at pp. 10731074.)

Hartman v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

20 Cal. App. 2d 76 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1937

(State Bar of California v. Hull, 103 Cal. App. 302 [ 284 Pac. 492 ].) There is no merit in the contention that the crime for which appellant was convicted did not involve moral turpitude. (Holloway v. … Nor would the statute, if a defense, deprive the board of jurisdiction. (Ex parte Tyler, 107 Cal. 78 [ 40 Pac. 33 ].) In the recent case of Whitten v.

Longval v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

51 Cal. App. 4th 792 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 1996

Brown Act.) … (Bruno v.

Duffy v. State Board of Equalization

152 Cal. App. 3d 1156 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 1984

Franchise Tax Board (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 473, 479-480 [ 192 Cal.Rptr. 677 ]; Barnes v. … (American Civil Liberties Union v. Board of Education, 59 Cal.2d 203, 218 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 700 , 379 P.2d 4 ]; People v. Victor, 62 Cal.2d 280, 300 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 199 , 398 P.2d 391 ].)” (Fletcher v.

Matea v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 314 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 2006

The Board filed an opinion and order denying further reconsideration on November 3, 2005. The Board stated in part, “the Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. … This rule is binding upon the Board as well as this court. (Lamb v. Workmen’s Comp.

Tringham v. State Board of Education

137 Cal. App. 2d 733 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 1955

(Town of Hayward *736 v. Pimental, 107 Cal. 386 [ 40 P. 545 ]; Kleiner v. Garrison, supra; 16 Cal.Jur. 870, § 68.) … Contractors’ State License Board, 124 Cal. App.2d 149,154 [ 268 P.2d 139 ].) In Ashdown v. State, 135 Cal.App.2d 291, 297 [ 287 P.2d 176 ], it was said, quoting from Dare v.

Illingworth v. State Board of Control

161 Cal. App. 3d 274 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 1984

The Board accepts the construction of our state courts of “residence” (§§ 243-244) to mean “domicile” (see, e.g., Smith v. Smith (1955) 45 Cal.2d 235, 239 [ 288 P.2d 497 ]; Fenton v. … (Fenton v.

Slocum v. State Board of Equalization

36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 627 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 9, 2005

Recognizing that in the aftermath of the events of September 11, 2001, “[a]ccess to airport property throughout California was restricted,” in 2002 the California State Board of Equalization (SBE or board) promulgated a regulation … Board of Trustees (1976) 16 Cal.3d 818, 827 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 443 , 548 P.2d 1115 ].)