Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.30s

  • Coletti v. State Board of Equalization

    94 Cal. App. 2d 61 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1949

    If he is to be made the sole licensee it must be through action by the board. There is, however, no authority in the board to revoke a partnership license as to the interest of one of the partners. … Sess. 1946); Lewis & Potter v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    116 Cal. App. 3d 954 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1981

    In Gallamore v. Workers’ Comp. … The Board deemed the initial penalty to be a separate benefit serving the separate purpose of deterring delays in payment. The Meadows approach was also utilized by the Board in an earlier case. In Fisher v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Duval v. Contractors State License Board

    125 Cal. App. 2d 532 · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1954

    That has long been the law in this state, it was wisely applied in Cecil v. … The earlier chapters of that part relate to the filing of claims against the state and their approval by the state controller or board of control. Chapter 3 is entitled “Actions.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Harrison v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    44 Cal. App. 3d 197 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1974

    (State of California v. Ind. Acc. Com., supra, pp. 361-362; Aetna Cas. & Surety Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com., supra, p. 395; see also DiGenova v. … (See Jenkins v. Workmen’s Comp.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Petrucci v. Board of Medical Examiners

    45 Cal. App. 3d 83 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 3, 1975

    (See Dare v. … See also Shakin v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Jenkins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    31 Cal. App. 3d 259 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1973

    On the other hand, the board contends that the controlling factor is the date of the original injury, and not the date of the award. It relies on State of California v. Ind. Acc. … Torgrimson (1939) 12 Cal.2d 633 [ 86 P.2d 826 ]), or by an ordinary proceeding before the appeals board to collect compensation (Graybiel v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Board of Directors v. Westenberg

    57 Cal. App. 2d 90 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1943

    Proc., § 1981; People v. Selma Irr. Dist., 98 Cal. 206 [ 32 P. 1047 ] ; Bottoms v. Madera Irr. Dist., 74 Cal.App. 681 [ 242 P. 100 ].) … Dist., supra, at p. 333; Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors, 131 Cal. 364, 367 [ 63 P. 663 , 82 Am.St.Rep. 350 ].)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Dethlefsen v. State Board of Equalization

    145 Cal. App. 2d 561 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 1, 1956

    They are: Young v. State Board of Equalization, 90 Cal.App.2d 256 [ 202 P.2d 587 ]; Conti v. State Board of Equalization, 113 Cal.App.2d 465 [ 248 P.2d 31 ], and Keane v. Reilly, 130 Cal.App.2d 407 [ 279 P.2d 152 ]. … Keane v. Reilly reviews the other two. In Young v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Clare v. State Board of Accountancy

    10 Cal. App. 4th 294 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 1992

    (Newland v. Board of Governors (1977) 19 Cal.3d 705, 711 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 620 , 566 P.2d 254 ], fn. omitted; see also Perrine v. Municipal Court (1971) 5 Cal.3d 656, 663 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 320 , 488 P.2d 648 ]; Brewer v. … (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180-181 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ], original italics.)

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Henson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    27 Cal. App. 3d 452 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 1972

    (McCoy v. Industrial Acc. Com., 64 Cal.2d 82, 86 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 858 , 410 P.2d 362 ]; Cal. Union Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 183 Cal.App.2d 644, 648 [ 7 Cal.Rptr. 67 ]; Simien v. Industrial Acc. … Bd., supra, 3 Cal.3d 312, 317 ; Le Vesque v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 1 Cal.3d 627, 638-639 .) The board’s finding that there was no evidence that Dr.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Carlson v. Assessment Appeals Board I

    167 Cal. App. 3d 1004 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 1985

    In De Luz Homes, Inc. v. … The court in Hoover v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Glass v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    105 Cal. App. 3d 297 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1980

    The Board, however, in Becker v. Security Pacific National Bank (Board en banc opinion, 1976) 41 Cal. … v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION ETC. v. Wilson

    57 Cal. App. 4th 967 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 1997

    In a related appeal of the underlying lawsuit (Board of Administration v. … We affirmed the judgment in Board of Administration v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    266 Cal. App. 2d 818 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1968

    On review “. . . even if the findings [of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board] are inadequate for uncertainty they will be upheld if they can be made certain by reference to the record.” (Rogers Material Co. v. … Conflicts in the evidence must be resolved in favor of the findings of the board, and these findings will not be disturbed on appeal if there exists any evidence in their support. (Jones v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Board of Supervisors

    154 Cal. App. 2d 101 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 27, 1957

    In People v. … (See, generally, Fragley v. Phelan, 126 Cal. 383 [ 58 P. 923 ].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hernandez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    2 Cal. App. 5th 549 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 2016

    ADJ1646469) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and DEPARTMENT OF THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, Respondents. … XIV, § 4; see Claxton v. Waters (2004) 34 Cal.4th 367, 373; Le Parc Community Assn. v. Workers’ Comp.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Avila v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    14 Cal. App. 3d 33 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1970

    Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 57 Cal.2d 589, 593 [ 21 Cal. Rptr. 545 , 371 P.2d 281 ].) … Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Hutchinson), supra, 59 Cal.2d at p. 53 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Worker's Compensation Appeals Board

    41 Cal. App. 3d 937 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 1974

    Industrial Commission, supra, 11 N.W.2d 179, 180 [riding running board]; Sherrill & La Follette v. Herring, 78 Ariz. 332 [ 279 P.2d 907, 910 ] [running stop sign].) In Zenith National Insurance Company v. Ind. A,cc. … System v. Ind. Acc. Com., 97 Cal.App.2d 380 [ 217 P.2d 992 ].) In its decision the board relied upon Relay v. Continental American Life Ins. Co., 22 N.J.Misc. 347 [ 39 A.2d 84 ], affd. 133 N.J.L. 143 [ 43 A.2d 266 ].

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • California Teachers Assn. v. Governing Board

    195 Cal. App. 3d 285 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1987

    (Taylor v. Board of Trustees (1984) 36 Cal.3d 500, 507 [ 204 Cal.Rptr. 711 , 683 P.2d 710 ].) … Retirement Board (1983) 139 Cal.App.3d 600, 602 [ 188 Cal.Rptr. 853 ], and California School Employees Assn. v. Board of Trustees (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d-392, 395 [ 192 Cal.Rptr. 633 ].)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Collins v. Board of Medical Examiners

    29 Cal. App. 3d 439 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1972

    Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 68 Cal.2d 67 , involved an accusation that Dr. … (Brown v. Gordon (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 659 , *447 667 [ 49 Cal.Rptr. 901 ].)

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.