Case law

Swaby v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

85 Cal. App. 3d 264 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1978

Claimant Gus Swaby, a seasonal farm worker, was denied unemployment benefits by respondent California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (Board) and denied a writ of mandate by the trial court. … Smith v. County Engineer (1966) 266 Cal.App.2d 645, 649 [ 72 Cal.Rptr. 501 ].)

Longval v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

51 Cal. App. 4th 792 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 1996

Brown Act.) … (Bruno v.

Strode v. Board of Medical Examiners

195 Cal. App. 2d 291 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 1, 1961

Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm,., 34 Cal.2d 20 [ 206 P.2d 841 ], Cooper v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 35 Cal.2d 242 [ 217 P.2d 630 , 18 A.L.R.2d 593 ], and Dami v. … Board of Police Commissioners, 145 Cal.App.2d 783 [ 303 P.2d 104 ]; Bonham v. McConnell, 45 Cal.2d 304 [ 288 P.2d 502 ]; Mast v. State Board of Optometry, 139 Cal.App.2d 78 [ 293 P.2d 148 ] and Cooper v.

Brown v. Montage at Mission Hills, Inc.

California Court of Appeal · Aug 20, 2021

.’”]; Batt v. … (Palmer v. Agee, supra, at p. 384; Bernard v.

Hutchinson v. Contractors' State License Board

143 Cal. App. 2d 628 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 2, 1956

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ] ; Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, 21 Cal.2d 790, 795 [ 136 P.2d 304 ] ; Ashdown v. State, 135 Cal.App.2d 291, 299 [ 287 P.2d 176 ].) … (Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, at page 308; Ashdown v. State, supra, at page 299.)

Whitlow v. Board of Medical Examiners

248 Cal. App. 2d 478 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1967

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].) … Morris v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 230 Calo.App.2d 704; Cooper v. State Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 35 Cal.2d 242 and Bonham v.

Irvine v. State Board of Equalization

40 Cal. App. 2d 280 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 5, 1940

(Martin v. Board of Supervisors, 135 Cal. App. 96 [ 26 Pac. (2d) 843 ]; Smith v. Foster, 15 Fed. (2d) 115.) … In the case of State Board of Equalization v.

Slocum v. State Board of Equalization

36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 627 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 9, 2005

Recognizing that in the aftermath of the events of September 11, 2001, “[a]ccess to airport property throughout California was restricted,” in 2002 the California State Board of Equalization (SBE or board) promulgated a regulation … Board of Trustees (1976) 16 Cal.3d 818, 827 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 443 , 548 P.2d 1115 ].)

Rausch v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

274 Cal. App. 2d 357 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 26, 1969

Corp. v. Industrial Acc. … (Arabian American Oil Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Kopping v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 618 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 11, 2006

matter in light of two recent en banc decisions by the Board on the issue of apportionment: Sanchez v. … (See, e.g., County of Los Angeles v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (1997) 62 Cal.Comp.Cases 504; State Compensation Ins. Fund v. Industrial Acc.

Grisso v. Board of Medical Examiners

75 Cal. App. 385 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 1925

This subject has been fully discussed in several recent decisions: Thrasher v. Board of Medical Exanniners, 44 Cal. App. 26 [ 185 Pac. 1006 ] ; Lantermam v. Alderson, 3- 6 Cal. … App. 472 [ 172 Pac. 625 ]; expressly approved in Suckow v. Alderson, 182 Cal. 247 [187 *389 Pac. 965]; Anderson v. Board of Dental Examiners, 27 Cal. App. 339 [ 149 Pac. 1006 ].”

Daniels v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

27 Cal. App. 3d 504 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 1972

We think that case supports the decision of the board. In Garcia, the Supreme Court, at pages 689-690, quoted with approval the following language from Manning v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (Garcia v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 6 Cal.3d at pp. 689-690.)

Crawford v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

213 Cal. App. 3d 156 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 1989

As stated in Lipsey v. … Appeals Bd., supra, 35 Cal.App.3d 598 , limiting the exercise of contempt power to “the board or any member thereof’ (Lab.

Rutherford v. State Personnel Board

101 Cal. App. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1980

(Payne v. Superior Court (1976) 17 Cal. 3d 908, 925 [ 132 Cal.Rptr. 405 , 553 P.2d 565 ].) Rutherford contends he has a right to be offered any vacant administrative position for which he is qualified. We agree. … (Parsons v. Bristol Development Co. (1965) 62 Cal.2d 861 [ 44 Cal.Rptr. 767 , 402 P.2d 839 ].)

Koch v. Board of Supervisors

138 Cal. App. 343 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 1934

In Baldwin v. … In Miller v.

Brown & Bryant, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

24 Cal. App. 4th 247 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 1994

The companies, in turn, collectively agreed to pay $3,260,000 million to DHS or its designee upon delivery of documents releasing Brown & Bryant from any further claims by DHS, the California Water Resources Control Board … Board of Education v. Jack M. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 691, 698, fn. 3 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 700 , 566 P.2d 602 ].)

Conrad v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

47 Cal. App. 3d 237 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1975

Citing Smith v. District Unemployment Compensation Board (D.C. Cir. 1970) 435 F.2d 433 , appellant argues that the Appeals Board should have reviewed the initial SSA finding. … (Thomas v. California Emp. Stab. Com. (1952) 39 Cal.2d 501, 504 [ 247 P.2d 561 ]; Cal. Portland Cement Co. v. Cal. Unemp. Ins. Appeals Board (1960) 178 Cal.App.2d 263, 269 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 37 ].)

Kuykendall v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 130 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 2000

The Board’s conclusions on questions of law do not bind this court. (Dimmig v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1972) 6 Cal.3d 860, 864-865 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 105 , 495 P.2d 433 ]; Save Mart Stores v. Workers’ Comp. … Thus the Board has the authority, at any time, to order the taking of additional evidence. In Tyler v. Workers’ Comp.

Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners

47 Cal. App. 793 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 1920

[1] The facts in this case are identical with those set forth in the case of Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners, ante, p. 29, [ 190 P. 51 ], and on the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.

Turner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

258 Cal. App. 2d 442 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1968

Respondent Board contends that the Supreme Court has resolved this question in State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com. … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.