Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.03s
O'DONNELL v. Board of Medical Examiners
22 Cal. App. 2d 80 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 19, 1937
In Whitten v. State Board of Optometry, 8 Cal. (2d) 444 [ 65 Pac. (2d) 1296 ], following the case of Standard Oil Co. of California v. … And for the same reasons that prohibition would not lie in the case of Whitten v. State Board of Optometry, supra, it was held in Hartman v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 20 Cal.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCalifornia Ass'n of Professional Scientists v. Brown
216 Cal. App. 4th 421 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 2013
Plaintiff and Respondent, 34200980000358CUWMGDS) v. EDMUND G. BROWN, as Governor, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants. … (California Teachers Assn. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNuelle v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
92 Cal. App. 3d 239 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1979
On February 17, 1976, the board granted reconsideration to await the decision in Wilkinson v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., then pending before the Supreme Court. … Although Fuentes v. Workers’ Comp.
Cited 15 timesPublishedTyler v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
56 Cal. App. 4th 389 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1997
The matter will be remanded to enable the Board to exercise its discretion in this regard.” (King v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 231 Cal.App.3d at p. 1649 .) In Lundberg v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (See Bracken v. Workers’ Comp.
Cited 12 timesPublishedVarela v. Board of Police Commissioners
107 Cal. App. 2d 816 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1951
(Moreno v. Cairns, 20 Cal.2d 531 [ 127 P.2d 914 ].) … (Franklin v. Merida, 35 Cal. 558, 575 [95 Am.Dec. 129]; Little v. Union Oil Co., 73 Cal.App. 612, 621 [ 238 P. 1066 ]; Cohen v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 32 Cal.App.2d 337 [ 89 P.2d 732 ].)
Cited 13 timesPublishedSobo v. Board of Police Commissioners
145 Cal. App. 2d 783 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1956
In Swars v. … In Bonham v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedCarleson v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
64 Cal. App. 3d 145 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 1976
Thus, in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. … (People v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedOosterveen v. Board of Medical Examiners
112 Cal. App. 2d 201 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 1942
Brown, as Attorney General of the State of California, to secure a declaration that they have a right to practice naturopathy without securing a license from any of defendant boards. … Mills, 74 Cal.App. 353 [ 240 P. 296 ]; People v. Chong, 28 Cal.App. 121 [ 151 P. 553 ] ; Bohannon v. Board of Medical Examiners, 24 Cal.App. 215 [ 140 P. 1089 ]; Crane v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSunseri v. Board of Medical Examiners
224 Cal. App. 2d 309 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 1964
State Personnel Board, 208 Cal.App.2d 543, 546 [ 25 Cal.Rptr. 333 ]; McMurtry v. State Board of Medical Examiners, supra, at p. 774.) … (See Bonham, v. McConnell, 45 Cal.2d 304, 306 [ 288 P.2d 502 ]; Cooper v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 35 Cal.2d 242, 252 [ 217 P.2d 630 , 18 A.L.R.2d 593 ]; McMurtry v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedPurifoy v. State Board of Education
30 Cal. App. 3d 187 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1973
(Endler v. Schutzbank, supra, at p. 170 ; Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 238-239 [ 1 L.Ed.2d 796, 801-802 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 64 A.L.R.2d 288 ].) … Board of Medical Examiners, 46 Cal.2d 684 [ 298 P.2d 537 ], or by Endler v. Schutzbank, supra, 68 Cal.2d 162 , by Morrison v. State Board of Education, 1 Cal.3d 214 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 461 P.2d 375 ], or by Stanley v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedConti v. State Board of Equalization
113 Cal. App. 2d 465 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 1952
In proceedings before the State Board of Equalization on an accusation charging the sale of liquor to a minor the board ordered a 15-day suspension of the liquor license. … In a somewhat similar case (Young v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBrooks v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 277 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 2008
This court granted Virginia Brooks’s petition for writ of review from the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) to examine whether a year of industrial disability leave (IDL) payable to state employees … (Brodie v. Workers’ Comp.
Cited 6 timesPublishedArndt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
56 Cal. App. 3d 139 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1976
The Board had obviously considered the “date of injury” to be the last day of deceased’s exposure (Apr. 28, 1967) to the disease-causing asbestos substances. In Marsh v. Industrial Acc. … Warrington v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedLyons v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
44 Cal. App. 3d 1007 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1975
(See City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Fraide), 63 Cal.2d 242 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 97 , 404 P.2d *1016 801]; Stafford v. Los Angeles etc. Retirement Board, 42 Cal.2d 795 [ 270 P.2d 12 ]; Lyons v. … Code, § 664; Bringle v. Board of Supervisors, 54 Cal.2d 86, 89 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 493 , 351 P.2d 765 ]; Gee v. California State Personnel Bd., 5 Cal.App.3d 713, 718 [ 85 Cal.Rptr. 762 ]; Griffith v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedJohnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
41 Cal. App. 3d 318 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 23, 1974
Brown, 13 Cal.App.3d 513 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 651 ]), a cleaning lady who is injured while performing services in the maintenance of business premises is not excluded. (Baugh v. … The order of the respondent Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board is annulled and the cause is remanded to said respondent board for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in this opinion.
Cited 9 timesPublishedRobinson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
194 Cal. App. 3d 784 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 9, 1987
Petitioner cites Draper v. Workers’ Comp. … . *793 Code, tit. 8, ch. 4.5, § 10700), the Board and not the physician is the trier of fact. (Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 740, 753 [ 151 Cal.Rptr. 215 ].)
Cited 10 timesPublishedLee v. Board of Registered Nursing
209 Cal. App. 4th 793 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 2012
Board of Registered Nursing (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 219, 227 [ 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 364 ], quoting Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners (1968) 68 Cal.2d 67, 69 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 785 , 435 P.2d 553 ]; accord, Sulla v. … (Sulla v. *798 Board of Registered Nursing, supra, 205 Cal.App.4th 1195, 1200 ; Finnerty v. Board of Registered Nursing, supra, 168 Cal.App.4th 219, 227 .)
Cited 5 timesPublishedMedina v. BOARD OF RETIREMENT, LACERA
5 Cal. Rptr. 3d 634 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 2003
. ; Crumpler v. Board of Administration (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 567, 584-585 [ 108 Cal.Rptr. 293 ]____)” (Id. at pp. 28-29, italics added.) … Crumpler v. Board of Administration, supra, 32 Cal.App.3d at p. 584 [“Nor may estoppel be avoided on the ground that to invoke it would enlarge the statutory power of the board.
Cited 29 timesPublishedDavis v. Physician Assistant Board
California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 2021
In any event, in a case on which the Board relies, Norman v. … (Cobbs v. Grant (1972) 8 Cal.3d 229, 240-241 (Cobbs); Borman v Brown (2021) 59 Cal.App.5th 1048, 1050, fn. 3; Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc. (2017) 7 Cal.App.5th 276, 322, citing Moore v.
Cited 0 timesPublished103 Cal. App. 2d 49 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1951
In Brown v. State Personnel Board, 43 Cal.App.2d 70 [ 110 P.2d 497 ], the reason given in the notice of rejection was “services unsatisfactory,’’ and this was held to be insufficient. … In Wiles v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna