Case law

Miller v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

258 Cal. App. 2d 490 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1968

As the court said in Beveridge v. Industrial Acc. … (Beveridge v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, 175 Cal.App.2d 592, 595 ; Fidelity & Cas. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 9 C.C.C. 294, 295.)

Vera v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 151 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 2, 2007

Mountain Lion Foundation v. … “[T]he Board has extensive expertise in *1011 interpreting and applying the workers’ compensation scheme.

Lizama v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

40 Cal. App. 3d 363 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1974

His subsequent petition for reconsideration was denied by the board. … .) *371 The decisions of the board are annulled and the case is remanded to the board for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in this opinion.

Burton v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

112 Cal. App. 3d 85 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1980

Recently in Gallamore v. Workers’ Comp. … (See Ramsey v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1969) 2 Cal.App.3d 693, 698 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 51 ].)

Spear v. Board of Medical Examiners

146 Cal. App. 2d 207 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1956

In People v. … (See also McCord v. Plotnick, 104 Cal.App.2d 495, 496 [ 231 P.2d 880 ]; Cross v. Tustin, 37 Cal.2d 821, 825-826 [ 236 P.2d 142 ].) In People v.

Radovich v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

72 Cal. App. 3d 36 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1977

Boire v. … Co. v. Ind. Acc.

Eddie v. Schumacher Wall Board Co.

79 Cal. App. 318 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 1926

(Nahhas v. Browning, 181 Cal. 55 [6 A. L. R. 476, 183 Pac. 442 ].) … (Foster v. Young, 172 Cal. 317, 320 [ 156 Pac. 476 ].)

Jardine v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

163 Cal. App. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1984

{Jones v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 68 Cal.2d 476, 480 [ 67 Cal.Rptr. 544 , 439 P.2d 648 ], disapproved on another ground in Le Vesque v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … A second contention by petitioner is that the Board erred in refusing to impose multiple penalties against Fremont Indemnity under section 5814 for its delay in payment of benefits. Citing Gallamore v. Workers’ Comp.

Brennfleck v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

3 Cal. App. 3d 666 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 20, 1970

In Temescal Rock Co. v. Industrial Acc. … (Kunakoff v. Woods, supra, 166 Cal.App.2d at p. 67 .) The second, under the law as interpreted by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, would have only the right to share in the $17,500 death benefits.

Morris v. Board of Medical Examiners

230 Cal. App. 2d 704 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1964

(Sunseri v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 224 Cal.App.2d 309, 313 .) … (Magit v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 57 Cal.2d 74, 87 .) There was no abuse of discretion in the present ease. (Cf. Furnish v.

Mendoza v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

54 Cal. App. 3d 820 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1976

Co. v. Industrial Acc. … The order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board is affirmed and the petition denied. Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Ault, J., concurred.

Howard v. Franchise Tax Board

243 Cal. App. 2d 482 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 1966

(Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of Equalization, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … In Lykes v.

Leo v. Board of Medical Examiners

36 Cal. App. 2d 490 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 10, 1940

(Wines v. Garrison, 190 Cal. 650 [ 214 Pac. 56 , 26 A. L. R. 1302].) … (Carpy v. Dowdell, 129 Cal. 244 [ 61 Pac. 1126 ].) Judgment affirmed.

Flores v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

30 Cal. App. 3d 681 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 21, 1973

(See Perez v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd. (1970) 4 Cal.App.3d 62, 65 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 871 ]; Hicks v. … Three cases relied upon by the Attorney General, as attorney for the board, are readily distinguished. In Fermin v.

Barns v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

216 Cal. App. 3d 524 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1989

(Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 22 Cal.3d at p. 664.) However, the WCJ and Board “must accept as tme the intended meaning of [evidence] both uncontradicted and unimpeached.” (McAllister v. … Appeals Bd. (1985) 50 Cal.Comp.Cases 22 [no violation where two doctors agreed on restrictions which precluded assignment to available jobs]; Brown v. Workers’ Comp.

Belli v. Board of Supervisors

123 Cal. App. 44 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 25, 1932

(Jacobs v. Board of Supervisors, 100 Cal. 121 [ 34 Pac. 630 ]; McDonald v. Dodge, 97 Cal. 112 [ 31 Pac. 909 ]; Brooks v. Fischer, 79 Cal. 173 [4 L. R. A. 429, 21 Pac. 652 ]; 18 Cal. … The respondent board therefore did not exceed its jurisdiction in hearing and determining the appeal and the proceedings before the respondent board are affirmed. Nourse, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Ferreira v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

38 Cal. App. 3d 120 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1974

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. Petitioner, James N. … 8, 1966. - The order of the appeals boards is annulled and the cause is remanded to that board for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein.

Elder v. Board of Medical Examiners

241 Cal. App. 2d 246 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1966

(c); and see Magit v. Board of Medical Examiners (1961) 57 Cal.2d 74, 80 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 488 , 366 P.2d 816 ]; Cooper v. … (See Randle v. California State Board of Pharmacy (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 254, 256-257 [ 49 Cal.Rptr. 485 ]; and People v.

Maranville v. State Board of Equalization

99 Cal. App. 2d 841 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 1950

(Banken v. State Board of Equalization, 79 Cal.App.2d 572 [ 180 P.2d 400 ].) … In Coca-Cola Co. v.

Stephens v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

20 Cal. App. 3d 461 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1971

Recent cases of our Supreme Court which have enunciated those rules are LeVesque v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. (1970) 1 Cal.3d 627, 637 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 208 , 463 P.2d 432 ], and Place v. Workmen's Comp. App. … In Michon v. Workmen's Comp. App.