Case law

Brennfleck v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

3 Cal. App. 3d 666 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 20, 1970

In Temescal Rock Co. v. Industrial Acc. … (Kunakoff v. Woods, supra, 166 Cal.App.2d at p. 67 .) The second, under the law as interpreted by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, would have only the right to share in the $17,500 death benefits.

Coletti v. State Board of Equalization

94 Cal. App. 2d 61 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1949

If he is to be made the sole licensee it must be through action by the board. There is, however, no authority in the board to revoke a partnership license as to the interest of one of the partners. … Sess. 1946); Lewis & Potter v.

Anderson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

116 Cal. App. 3d 954 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1981

In Gallamore v. Workers’ Comp. … The Board deemed the initial penalty to be a separate benefit serving the separate purpose of deterring delays in payment. The Meadows approach was also utilized by the Board in an earlier case. In Fisher v.

Harrison v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

44 Cal. App. 3d 197 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1974

(State of California v. Ind. Acc. Com., supra, pp. 361-362; Aetna Cas. & Surety Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com., supra, p. 395; see also DiGenova v. … (See Jenkins v. Workmen’s Comp.

Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners

244 Cal. App. 2d 521 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 29, 1966

(Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners, 219 Cal.App.2d 504 [ 33 Cal.Rptr. 349 ].) Our remittitur was issued September 25, 1963. … (In re Scaranino, 7 Cal.2d 309, 311 [ 60 P.2d 288 ] ; Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners, supra, 219 Cal.App.2d at pp. 507, 508.)

Pasillas v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

156 Cal. App. 3d 312 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1984

(Radio Officers v. Labor Board (1954) 347 U.S. 17, 40-41 [ 98 L.Ed. 455, 477 , 74 S.Ct. 323 ]; Labor Board v. General Motors, supra, 373 U.S. at pp. 740-741 [ 10 L.Ed.2d at p. 675 ].) … The Board had relied on *336 language in Labor Board v.

Griffith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

209 Cal. App. 3d 1260 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 1989

The interpretation of the applicable statutes by the Board panel in Quiros v. State Comp. Ins. Fund, supra, 16 Cal. Workers’ Comp. … (Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 165 Cal.App.3d at pp. 639-640; see Nick Hagopian Drywall v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1988) 204 Cal.App.3d 767, 772-773 [ 251 Cal.Rptr. 455 ]; Rivera v.

Serrano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

16 Cal. App. 3d 787 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1971

(Witt v. Jackson, supra; De Cruz v. Reid, supra.) … (Benwell v. Dean, supra; Tate v. Superior Court, supra; Witt v. Jackson, supra.)

Cornblum v. Board of Supervisors

110 Cal. App. 3d 976 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1980

The San Diego County Board of Supervisors (Board) is charged with the duty to preserve the county public health and appoint a health officer to enforce public health statutes. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Hamrick, J., * concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied October 21, 1980. * Assigned by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council.

Kuykendall v. State Board of Equalization

22 Cal. App. 4th 1194 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 22, 1994

In Rider v. … State Board of Equalization (1962) 58 Cal.2d 252 [ 23 Cal.Rptr. 589 , 373 P.2d 637 ], and Javor v.

Heiman v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

57 Cal. Rptr. 3d 56 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 2007

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) concluded that petitioner was the employer liable for workers’ compensation. … In Blew v.

Lizama v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

40 Cal. App. 3d 363 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1974

His subsequent petition for reconsideration was denied by the board. … .) *371 The decisions of the board are annulled and the case is remanded to the board for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in this opinion.

Board of Directors v. Westenberg

57 Cal. App. 2d 90 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1943

Proc., § 1981; People v. Selma Irr. Dist., 98 Cal. 206 [ 32 P. 1047 ] ; Bottoms v. Madera Irr. Dist., 74 Cal.App. 681 [ 242 P. 100 ].) … Dist., supra, at p. 333; Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors, 131 Cal. 364, 367 [ 63 P. 663 , 82 Am.St.Rep. 350 ].)

Lickley v. County Board of Education

62 Cal. App. 527 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 15, 1923

Co. v. … In Wood v. Board of Fire Commrs., 50 Cal.

Michon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

15 Cal. App. 3d 917 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1971

The question involved is whether the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (“board”) has power to grant reconsideration and to reduce the award. … Procedure (1954) p. 2051, citing Diamond v. Superior Court (1922) 189 Cal. 732, 736 [ 210 P. 36 ], and other cases; id. 1967 Supp., p. 835, citing Fomco, Inc. v.

Stephens v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

20 Cal. App. 3d 461 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1971

Recent cases of our Supreme Court which have enunciated those rules are LeVesque v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. (1970) 1 Cal.3d 627, 637 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 208 , 463 P.2d 432 ], and Place v. Workmen's Comp. App. … In Michon v. Workmen's Comp. App.

Scott v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

122 Cal. App. 3d 979 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 1981

Statement of the Case This court issued a writ of review, at the request of petitioner Rod-man Scott, to consider an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter Board) dated February 6, 1981. … Workmen’s Compensation Practice (Cont.Ed.Bar 1973) § 10.3, pp. 322-323; Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Workers’ Comp.

Morris v. Board of Medical Examiners

230 Cal. App. 2d 704 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1964

(Sunseri v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 224 Cal.App.2d 309, 313 .) … (Magit v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 57 Cal.2d 74, 87 .) There was no abuse of discretion in the present ease. (Cf. Furnish v.

Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

266 Cal. App. 2d 818 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1968

On review “. . . even if the findings [of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board] are inadequate for uncertainty they will be upheld if they can be made certain by reference to the record.” (Rogers Material Co. v. … Conflicts in the evidence must be resolved in favor of the findings of the board, and these findings will not be disturbed on appeal if there exists any evidence in their support. (Jones v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Hansen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

18 Cal. App. 4th 1179 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 1993

(McGowan v. Maryland *1183 (1961) 366 U.S. 420, 425-426 [ 6 L.Ed.2d 393, 398-399 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 ]; McDonald v. Board of Election (1969) 394 U.S. 802, 808-809 [ 22 L.Ed.2d 739, 745-746 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 ]; Weber v. … (Westbrook v. Mihaly (1970) 2 Cal.3d 765, 784-785 [ 87 Cal.Rptr. 839 , 471 P.2d 487 ], and cases cited; Sail’er Inn, Inc. v. Kirby (1971) 5 Cal.3d 1, 16-17 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 329 , 485 P.2d 529 , 46 A.L.R.3d 351 ]; Weber v.