Case law

Purifoy v. State Board of Education

30 Cal. App. 3d 187 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1973

(Endler v. Schutzbank, supra, at p. 170 ; Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 238-239 [ 1 L.Ed.2d 796, 801-802 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 64 A.L.R.2d 288 ].) … Board of Medical Examiners, 46 Cal.2d 684 [ 298 P.2d 537 ], or by Endler v. Schutzbank, supra, 68 Cal.2d 162 , by Morrison v. State Board of Education, 1 Cal.3d 214 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 461 P.2d 375 ], or by Stanley v.

Yancey v. State Personnel Board

167 Cal. App. 3d 478 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1985

(Stanton v. State Personnel Bd. (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 729, 734 [ 164 Cal.Rptr. 557 ] and citations therein.) This is true even if a vested right is affected by the Board’s decision. (Id., at p. 735; see also Goggin v. … The court noted the “destructive effect on the appearance of impartiality” (id., at pp. 510, 516) this created, and upheld a 20-day suspension imposed by the Board. Parker v.

York v. Board of Supervisors

120 Cal. App. 3d 179 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1981

board, or for a term of four years subject to removal by the board for cause. … to mean “the board of supervisors.”

Social Welfare Board v. Johnson

38 Cal. App. 2d 717 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 1940

Under such circumstances it was the legal duty of respondent to draw a warrant for the first month and for each successive month thereafter, if ordered to do so by the board of supervisors. … It is urged by respondent that the Social Welfare Board had no authority or jurisdiction to order payment of the amount, as such act was a judicial one.

Brooks v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 277 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 2008

This court granted Virginia Brooks’s petition for writ of review from the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) to examine whether a year of industrial disability leave (IDL) payable to state employees … (Brodie v. Workers’ Comp.

Lara v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

182 Cal. App. 4th 393 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 2010

Fund v. Brown (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 188, 202 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 98 ].) Certainly, Lara did not unreasonably rely on Patricia’s ostensible authority to retain him. … Fund v. Brown, supra, 32 Cal.App.4th at p. 204 .) 2. Metro Diner’s petition for reconsideration was verified.

Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

41 Cal. App. 3d 318 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 23, 1974

Brown, 13 Cal.App.3d 513 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 651 ]), a cleaning lady who is injured while performing services in the maintenance of business premises is not excluded. (Baugh v. … The order of the respondent Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board is annulled and the cause is remanded to said respondent board for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in this opinion.

Abbott Laboratories v. Franchise Tax Board

175 Cal. App. 4th 1346 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 6, 2009

Co. v. … (Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 3 Cal.3d at pp. 749-750, italics omitted.)

Davis v. State Board of Optometry

35 Cal. App. 2d 428 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 1939

(Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, supra, pp. 84, 86.) … Proc.; Williams v. Wren, 88 Cal. App. 607 [ 263 Pac. 1038 ]; Black v. Board of Police Commrs., 17 Cal. App. 310, 313 [ 119 Pac. 674 ]; Taylor v. Taylor, 192 Cal. 71, 80 [ 218 Pac. 756 , 51 A. L. R 1074].)

Galloway v. Franchise Tax Board

31 Cal. App. 3d 928 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1973

The motions of plaintiffs were denied and those of defendant Franchise Tax Board were granted. Judgments of dismissal followed, and plaintiffs appeal. Appellants rely upon the code provision (Gov. … Brown (H. C.), J., and Caldecott, J., concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied May 25, 1973, and appellants’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied June 28, 1973.

Klemp v. Franchise Tax Board

45 Cal. App. 3d 870 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1975

. *872 After the Franchise Tax Board (hereinafter “Board”) had assessed against Mr. and Mrs. … We therefore accept the Board’s view that this case involves the applicability of a statute to uncontradicted facts, which is purely a question of law, as was the issue in Whittell v.

Belmont v. State Personnel Board

36 Cal. App. 3d 518 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 1974

Board of Education, 6 Cal.3d 575, 587, fn. 7 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 16 , 493 P.2d 480 ]; Morrison v. State Board of Education, 1 Cal.3d 214, 222 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 461 P.2d 375 ]; Blake v. … (Gilmore v. Personnel Board, 161 Cal.App.2d 439, 449 [ 326 P.2d 874 ].)

Parsons v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

126 Cal. App. 3d 629 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 8, 1981

(P ruitt v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, at p. 553.) … Pruitt v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 261 Cal.App.2d at p. 553 .)

Morrison v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

65 Cal. App. 3d 245 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1976

Warriner v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 32 Cal.App.3d 353 [ 108 Cal.Rptr. 153 ], supports the Board’s position. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Ault, J., concurred.

Stermer v. Board of Dental Examiners

95 Cal. App. 4th 128 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 10, 2002

(Green v. Board of Dental Examiners (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 786, 795-796 [ 55 Cal.Rptr.2d 140 ].) … The Board has the implied power to enter into settlements of licensing disputes and to incorporate such settlements into formal Board orders. (Frankel v.

Loskouski v. State Personnel Board

4 Cal. App. 4th 453 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1992

(United Air Lines, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 762, 772 [ 187 Cal.Rptr. 387 , 654 P.2d 157 ].) … (United Air Lines, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd., supra, 32 Cal.3d at p. 772 .)

Cohn v. County Board of Supervisors

135 Cal. App. 2d 180 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1955

The court further found that the proceedings before the board of supervisors under section 662 of the zoning ordinance accorded due process, and were within its jurisdiction (see Cooper v. … Moreover, both appellants were present at the hearing before the zoning board. Having appeared there, it is questionable whether they may now assert that they did not have legal notice. (North Side etc. Assn. v.

Batten v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

241 Cal. App. 4th 1009 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 2015

ADJ3781289) Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD; LONG BEACH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al., Respondents. … (Valdez v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (2013) 57 Cal.4th 1231, 1234 fn. 2.)

Grant v. Board of Medical Examiners

232 Cal. App. 2d 820 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1965

(Hostetter v. Alderson (1952) 38 Cal.2d 499, 500 [ 241 P.2d 230 ] ; Boren v. State Personnel Board, supra, 37 Cal.2d 634, 638 ; Savelli v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra.) … (Boren v. State Personnel Board, supra; Allen v. Humboldt County Board of Supervisors, supra, 220 Cal.App.2d 877, 881-882 ; see 3 Witkin, Cal.

Evenson v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

62 Cal. App. 3d 1005 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1976

In fact, in Labor Board v. … In Amuchastegui v.