Case law

Smith v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

52 Cal. App. 3d 405 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1975

They unsuccessfully challenged the appeals board ruling in the superior court and now appeal. … (Stockton v. Department of Employment, 25 Cal.2d 264, 271 [ 153 P.2d 741 ].) Dismissal and layoff are separate statutoiy actions, each entailing separate grounds and separate procedures. (Brown v.

Coulter v. Board of Education

40 Cal. App. 3d 445 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1974

Dist. v. … Dist. v. P. G. & E.

Germann v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

123 Cal. App. 3d 776 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 1981

Code, § 5950 et seq.) of the finding by respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) that respondent Edward C. … However, where the facts support only a single inference and conclusion, the question is one of law and a contrary finding by the Board is not sustainable on review. (Perguica v. Ind. Acc.

Albers v. State Board of Equalization

237 Cal. App. 2d 494 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1965

People v. … (District of Columbia v. Norwood Studios, Inc. (1964) 336 F.2d 746 ; Glushak v. City of New York (1958) 6 App.Div.2d 381 [ 178 N.Y.S.2d 33 ]; Green v. Sgurovsky (Fla.App. 1961) 133 So.2d 663 .)

Huston v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

95 Cal. App. 3d 856 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 7, 1979

Summary of Proceedings Before the Appeals Board. … (See Beagle v. Vasold (1966) 65 Cal.2d 166, 176 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 129 , 417 P.2d 673 ]; compare Roscoe Moss Co. v.

Lewis v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

56 Cal. App. 3d 729 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1976

(Gray v. Bolger (1958) 157 Cal.App.2d 583, 587 [ 321 P.2d 485 ]. Cf. McCoy v. Board of Supervisors (1941) 18 Cal.2d 193, 198-199 [ 114 P.2d 569 ]; Dierkes v. … (Garcia v. Industrial Accident Com. (1953) 41 Cal.2d 689, 693 [ 263 P.2d 8 ]; Cal. Portland Cement Co. v. *741 California Unemp. Ins. Appeals Board, supra, 178 Cal.App.2d 263 at p. 270 ; Silva v.

Bohannon v. Board of Medical Examiners

24 Cal. App. 215 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1914

Again in Hellman v. … In State v. Board of Dental Examiners, 31 Wash. 492 , [ 72 Pac. 110 ], the question presented related to the practice of dentistry, but the principle is the same.

Prescod v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

57 Cal. App. 3d 29 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1976

The board relies on Warriner v. Unemployment Ins. … Portland Cement Co. v. Cal. Unemp. Ins. Appeals Board, 178 Cal.App.2d 263, 269 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 37 ]).

Pruitt v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

261 Cal. App. 2d 546 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1968

Fund v. Superior Court (1965) 237 Cal.App.2d 416 , at page 420 et seq. [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 891 ]. Our Supreme Court stated in Reinert v. Industrial Acc. … Fund v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Board (1967) 67 Cal.2d 925, 928 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 323 , 434 P.2d 619 ], As we have seen, it was also applied to effect a liberal definition of “employee” in California Highway Com. v.

Kramer v. State Board of Accountancy

200 Cal. App. 2d 163 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1962

The cases cited by appellants (La Prade v. Department of Water & Power, 27 Cal.2d 47 [ 162 P.2d 13 ] ; Laisne v. California State Board of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 [ 123 P.2d 457 ]; Swars v. … In Gould v.

Wheeler v. State Board of Forestry

144 Cal. App. 3d 522 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1983

(See Button v. Board of Administration (1981) 122 Cal.App.3d 730, 738-739 [ 176 Cal.Rptr. 218 ]; see also In re Ruffalo (1968) 390 U.S. 544 [ 20 L.Ed.2d 117 , 88 S.Ct. 1222 ]; Cannon v. … (Compare Pollak v.

Kleemann v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

127 Cal. App. 4th 274 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 2, 2005

Governing Board v. … See Garnett v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2004) 69 Cal.Comp.Cases 1467; Gonzales v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2004) 69 Cal.Comp.Cases 1472. Governing Board, supra, 18 Cal.3d at pages 828-831; People v.

Meade v. State Collection Agency Board

181 Cal. App. 2d 774 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1960

(Furnish v. Board of Medical Examiners, 149 Cal.App.2d 326 [ 308 P.2d 924 , 309 P.2d 493 ] ; Bold v. Board of Medical Examiners, *777 135 Cal.App. 29 [ 26 P.2d 707 ]; Traxler v. … (West Coast Home Improvement Co., Inc. v. Contractor’s State License Board, 72 Cal.App.2d 287, 301 [ 164 P.2d 811 ] ; In re Winne, 208 Cal. 35, 41 [ 280 P. 113 ].) In People v.

Starsky v. Board of Trustees

34 Cal. App. 3d 310 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 1973

(Sipper v. Urban (1943) 22 Cal.2d 138 [ 137 P.2d 425 ]; Lukens v. Nye (1909) 156 Cal. 498 [ 105 P. 593 ]; Draper v. Grant (1949) 91 Cal.App.2d 566 [ 205 P.2d 399 ].) … (Lass v. Eliassen (1928) 94 Cal.App. 175, 179 [ 270 P. 745 ]; People v. One 1940 Ford V-8 Coupe (1950) 36 Cal.2d 471, 476 [ 224 P.2d 677 ].)

Martin v. Board of Trustees

37 Cal. App. 2d 481 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1940

The appeal is by the defendant The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a corporation, from an order made after judgment, dated May 8, 1939, and entitled,.11 Order to strike purported judgment from … That contention is clearly sustained by the ruling stated in Cole v. Roebling Const. Co., 156 Cal. 443, 448, 449 [ 105 Pac. 255 ] ; Frazzini v. Cable, 114 Cal. App. 444, 453, 454 [ 300 Pac. 121 ] : Shea v.

Nelsen v. Workmen's Compesation Appeals Board

11 Cal. App. 3d 472 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 1970

Upon petition for reconsideration, respondent Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter, “board” or “WCAB”) held that the employer’s liability for further benefits should be credited with the amount of the employee … Likewise, except in unusual circumstances not here present, the board’s authority to allow employers a credit is derived solely from statute. (See San Bernardino County v. Industrial Acc.

Jensen v. Board of Trustees

43 Cal. App. 3d 945 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 1974

(La Rue v. Board of Trustees (1940) 40 Cal.App.2d 287, 293 [ 104 P.2d 639 ] and cases cited.) Taylor v. Board of Education (1939) 31 Cal.App.2d 734 [ 89 P.2d 148 ], and Fidler v. … The board relies on two decisions to support its argument, Fidler v. Board of Trustees, supra, 112 Cal.App. 296 , and Williams v. Bagnelle (1903) 138 Cal. 699 [ 72 P. 408 ].

Orinda Assn. v. Board of Supervisors

182 Cal. App. 3d 1145 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 1986

Assn. v. Board of Permit Appeals, supra, 66 Cal.2d at p. 779 .) … Assn. v. Board of Permit Appeals, supra, 66 Cal.2d at pp. 773-781.)

Tante v. Board of Administration

93 Cal. App. 3d 615 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1979

The court further held there was no “fundamental right" to work for a particular employer. *618 In Schmier v. … In Schmier the court relied on Townsend, supra, and on Miller v. State of California, 18 Cal.3d 808 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 386 , 557 P.2d 970 ].

Geffner v. Board of Psychology

California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 2024

(Land v. California Unemployment Ins. Appeals Board (2020) 54 Cal.App.5th 127, 139; see also Cassidy v. … V.