Case law

Daniel v. Board of Police Commissioners

190 Cal. App. 2d 566 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1961

It thus appears that the ordinance furnishes many guides for the board in considering matters with respect to a permit. In Wheeler v. … In People v.

Cozad v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

153 Cal. App. 2d 249 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1957

State Board of Medical Examiners, 143 Cal.App.2d 702 [ 300 P.2d 197 ]; and Hewitt v. State Board of Medical Examiners, supra. … Drucker v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 143 Cal.App.2d 702 [ 300 P.2d 197 ], does not aid appellant in the case at bar.

Stamps v. Board of Supervisors

233 Cal. App. 2d 256 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1965

The trial court issued peremptory writ requiring the board to restore the assessment. The board and lessee appeal. The garage was built upon land owned by the city, and was financed by bonds issued by the corporation. … Moreover, the board of equalization did not purport to determine this issue. It properly limited itself to the question of valuation (see Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v.

Meyer v. Board of Public Works

51 Cal. App. 2d 456 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1942

He cites the case of Shannon v. … Since in our judgment there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the commission, application of the principle referred to in Brown v. Board of Police Commissioners, 2 Cal.

Smith v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

52 Cal. App. 3d 405 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1975

They unsuccessfully challenged the appeals board ruling in the superior court and now appeal. … (Stockton v. Department of Employment, 25 Cal.2d 264, 271 [ 153 P.2d 741 ].) Dismissal and layoff are separate statutoiy actions, each entailing separate grounds and separate procedures. (Brown v.

Fix v. Board of Supervisors

213 Cal. App. 2d 524 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 1963

(Miller v. McKenna, 23 Cal.2d 774, 781 [ 147 P.2d 531 ].) … Trout, 146 Cal. 350, 359 [ 80 P. 81 ] ; see also Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 166 Cal.App.2d 519, 526 , et seq. [333 P.2d 378 ].)

Germann v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

123 Cal. App. 3d 776 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 1981

Code, § 5950 et seq.) of the finding by respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) that respondent Edward C. … However, where the facts support only a single inference and conclusion, the question is one of law and a contrary finding by the Board is not sustainable on review. (Perguica v. Ind. Acc.

Albers v. State Board of Equalization

237 Cal. App. 2d 494 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1965

People v. … (District of Columbia v. Norwood Studios, Inc. (1964) 336 F.2d 746 ; Glushak v. City of New York (1958) 6 App.Div.2d 381 [ 178 N.Y.S.2d 33 ]; Green v. Sgurovsky (Fla.App. 1961) 133 So.2d 663 .)

Kendall v. Board of Osteopathic Examiners

105 Cal. App. 2d 239 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1951

(Rinker v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 59 Cal.App.2d 222, 224 [ 138 P.2d 403, 405 ] ; People v. Emery, 79 Cal.App.2d 226, 231 [ 179 P.2d 843 ].) … Murphy v.

Traxler v. Board of Medical Examiners

135 Cal. App. 37 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1933

This case, in certain of its aspects, is similar to the ease of Bold v. Board of Medical Examiners, ante, p. 29 [ 26 Pac. (2d) 707 ]. … obtain in court trials (Suckow v.

Michon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

15 Cal. App. 3d 917 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1971

The question involved is whether the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (“board”) has power to grant reconsideration and to reduce the award. … Procedure (1954) p. 2051, citing Diamond v. Superior Court (1922) 189 Cal. 732, 736 [ 210 P. 36 ], and other cases; id. 1967 Supp., p. 835, citing Fomco, Inc. v.

Huston v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

95 Cal. App. 3d 856 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 7, 1979

Summary of Proceedings Before the Appeals Board. … (See Beagle v. Vasold (1966) 65 Cal.2d 166, 176 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 129 , 417 P.2d 673 ]; compare Roscoe Moss Co. v.

Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Brown

21 Cal. App. 2d 421 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 1937

V. Brown, *422 payable to plaintiff. The sole ground urged by Brown for a reversal of the judgment against him is lack of consideration on his part. In December, 1932, F. V. … Soc. v. Dowd, 137 Cal. 408 [ 70 Pac. 274 ]; Creamery Package Mfg. Co. v. Bennett, 48 Cal. App. 706 [ 192 Pac. 328 ] ; Yankelewitch v. Beach, 115 Cal. App. 629 [ 2 Pac. (2d) 498 ].) Judgment affirmed. Barnard, P.

Scott v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

122 Cal. App. 3d 979 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 1981

Statement of the Case This court issued a writ of review, at the request of petitioner Rod-man Scott, to consider an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter Board) dated February 6, 1981. … Workmen’s Compensation Practice (Cont.Ed.Bar 1973) § 10.3, pp. 322-323; Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Workers’ Comp.

Kramer v. State Board of Accountancy

200 Cal. App. 2d 163 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1962

The cases cited by appellants (La Prade v. Department of Water & Power, 27 Cal.2d 47 [ 162 P.2d 13 ] ; Laisne v. California State Board of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 [ 123 P.2d 457 ]; Swars v. … In Gould v.

Dakins v. Board of Pension Commissioners

134 Cal. App. 3d 374 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1982

In French v. … references shall be to the Labor Code unless otherwise specified. 4 The Board’s further reliance on Pathe v.

California Air Resources Board v. Hart

21 Cal. App. 4th 289 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 1993

Deukmejian v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 150, 154 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 478 , 624 P.2d 1206 ].) *296 3. Analysis of relevant statutes. a. The Board’s reliance on pertinent code sections. … Deukmejian v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at pp. 154-155; D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 11 Cal.3d 1, at p. 15 .)

Stuck v. Board of Medical Examiners

94 Cal. App. 2d 751 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 1949

(See Smulson v. Board of Dental Examiners, 47 Cal.App.2d 584 [ 118 P.2d 483 ] ; Bley v. Board of Dental Examiners, supra.) … (Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners, 17 Cal.2d 534, at pp. 537-538 [ 110 P.2d 992 ].)

Weissbuch v. Board of Medical Examiners

41 Cal. App. 3d 924 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 1974

(Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners, 68 Cal.2d 67 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 785 , 435 P.2d 553 ]; Morrison v. … In Collins v.

McKenzie v. Board of Education

1 Cal. App. 410 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 12, 1905

This is an application by petitioner for a writ of mandate against respondents as the board of education of the city and county of San Francisco, to compel said board to restore her to her position as teacher in the public … This contention has been disposed of against appellant in the case of Margaret McKenzie v.