Case law

Noble v. Franchise Tax Board

13 Cal. Rptr. 3d 363 · California Court of Appeal · May 11, 2004

To what extent, if any, the court gives deference to the conclusions of the FTB and Board of Equalization depends upon a number of factors. (See Yamaha Corp. of America v. … (Chapman v.

Muznik v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

51 Cal. App. 3d 622 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 1975

Co. v. Ind. Acc. … Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 65 Cal.2d 438 [ 55 Cal.Rptr. 254 , 421 P.2d 102 ]; Tanenbaum v. Industrial Acc. Com., 4 Cal.2d 615 [ 52 P.2d 215 ]; Brown v. Workmen’s Comp.

Twaits v. State Board of Equalization

93 Cal. App. 2d 796 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1949

(People v. Board of Directors, 174 Ill. 177 [ 51 N.E. 198 ].) … (Coca-Cola Co. v. Board of Equalization, 25 Cal.2d 918 [ 156 P.2d 1 ]; Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Emp. Com., 24 Cal.2d 753 [ 151 P.2d 233 , 155 A.L.R. 405 ]; California Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v.

Wilson v. State Board of Education

89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 745 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 1999

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ].) … (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 180 .)

Endo v. State Board of Equalization

143 Cal. App. 2d 395 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1956

(Cooper v. State Board of Equalization, 137 Cal.App.2d 672, 678 [ 290 P.2d 914 ]. See also Cornell v. Reilly, 127 Cal.App. 2d 178, 186 [ 273 P.2d 572 ]; Swegle v. … See Covert v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125, 131 [ 173 P.2d 545 ]; Chosick v. Reilly, 125 Cal.App. 2d 334, 338 [ 270 P.2d 547 ].)

Meyer v. Board of Public Works

51 Cal. App. 2d 456 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1942

He cites the case of Shannon v. … Since in our judgment there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the commission, application of the principle referred to in Brown v. Board of Police Commissioners, 2 Cal.

Chavez v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

31 Cal. App. 3d 5 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 1973

(For the importance of this section relative to the Subsequent Injuries Fund, see Brown v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., 20 Cal.App.3d 903, 913-914 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 96 ]; Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (But see’ Brown v. Workmen’s Comp.

Fix v. Board of Supervisors

213 Cal. App. 2d 524 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 1963

(Miller v. McKenna, 23 Cal.2d 774, 781 [ 147 P.2d 531 ].) … Trout, 146 Cal. 350, 359 [ 80 P. 81 ] ; see also Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 166 Cal.App.2d 519, 526 , et seq. [333 P.2d 378 ].)

Brougher v. Board of Public Works

107 Cal. App. 15 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1930

App. 443 [ 274 Pac. 397]; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 497 [ 234 Pac. 388 ]). … A. 1916B, 1248, 132 Pac. 584 ]; Ex parte Quong Wo, 161 Cal. 220 [ 118 Pac. 714 ] ; Brown v. City of Los Angeles, 183 Cal. 783, 790 [ 192 Pac. 716 ]).

Catania v. Board of Education

37 Cal. App. 593 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1918

(Kennedy v. … Board of Education, 82 Cal. 483 , [ 22 Pac. 1042 ]; Barthel v. Board of Education, 153 Cal. 376 , [ 95 Pac. 892 ]; Stockton v. Board of Education, 145 Cal. 246 , [ 78 Pac. 730 ]; Loehr v. Board of Education, 12 Cal.

Wilhelm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

255 Cal. App. 2d 30 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 5, 1967

The board could not have achieved a substantial understanding of the record without reviewing the evidence on the issue of exposure. (Fibreboard Paper etc. Corp. v. Industrial Acc. … Appeals Board, 245 Cal.App.2d 334, 335 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 848 ]; Allied Comp. Ins. Co. v. Indus *30 trial Acc. Com., supra, 57 Cal.2d 115, 119-120 .)

Epstein v. California Horse Racing Board

222 Cal. App. 2d 831 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 1963

If there was such evidence, the board’s findings and decision should be upheld, (Shepherd v. State Personnel Board, supra, 48 Cal.2d 41, 46 ; Covert v. … Brown in investing money in a real estate venture which respondent was promoting.

Manning v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

10 Cal. App. 3d 655 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1970

Applicant urges that Ramsey v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 2 Cal. App.3d 693 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 51 ], and Langer v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (Gobel v. Industrial Acc. Com., 1 Cal.2d 100, 103 [ 33 P.2d 413 ]; Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 211 Cal. 154, 160-161 [ 294 P. 703 , 72 A.L.R. 1118 ]; see Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Traxler v. Board of Medical Examiners

135 Cal. App. 37 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1933

This case, in certain of its aspects, is similar to the ease of Bold v. Board of Medical Examiners, ante, p. 29 [ 26 Pac. (2d) 707 ]. … obtain in court trials (Suckow v.

Mobley v. Board of Public Works

44 Cal. App. 167 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1919

and county, or whenever the electors shall petition the board of supervisors as provided in section 3 of the article for the acquisition of any public utility or utilities, the board of supervisors must procure from the … presented to the board of supervisors, favoring the acquisition of any designated public utility or utilities.

Vestal v. State Personnel Board

178 Cal. App. 2d 920 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1960

Pursuant to a stipulation of counsel the matter was submitted to the board on the testimony given before it and upon the record in the case of People v. … (People v. Wallin, 34 Cal.2d 777, 781 [ 215 P.2d 1 ] ; People v. Frankfort, 114 Cal.App.2d 680, 700 [ 251 P.2d 401 ].)

Andresen v. Board of Supervisors

235 Cal. App. 2d 436 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1965

Without such consent, whether the water district board passed a resolution or not, the board of supervisors could not proceed. … (Metropolitan Water Dist. v. Marquardt, 59 Cal.2d 159, 173 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 379 P.2d 28 ].) We adopt the statement of the trial judge, Gilbert B.

Cozad v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

153 Cal. App. 2d 249 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1957

State Board of Medical Examiners, 143 Cal.App.2d 702 [ 300 P.2d 197 ]; and Hewitt v. State Board of Medical Examiners, supra. … Drucker v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 143 Cal.App.2d 702 [ 300 P.2d 197 ], does not aid appellant in the case at bar.

California Teachers Assn. v. Governing Board

70 Cal. App. 3d 833 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 1977

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. This cause comes before the court on an agreed statement pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 6(a). … (See Strumsky v. San Diego Employees Retirement Assn. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 28 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 805 , 520 P.2d 29 ]; Turner v. Board of Trustees (1976) 16 Cal.3d 818, 825 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 443 , 548 P.2d 1115 ]; Bixby v.

Koehler v. Board of Trustees

83 Cal. App. 648 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1927

(Ratto v. Board of *651 Supervisors, 75 Cal. App. 724 [ 243 Pac. 466 ]; Wright v. Engram, 186 Cal. 659 [ 201 Pac. 788 ].) Such, ruling is not necessarily determinative of the entire question. It is stated in Ratto v. … (Ratto v. Board of Supervisors, supra; Laam v. McLaren, 28 Cal. App. 632 -639 [ 153 Pac. 985 ].)