Case law

People v. Brown

114 Cal. App. 2d 52 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1952

John Mark Brown John Mark Brown “Above fully accepted by me this 16th day of Feb. 1950. Arthur A. Matthews Arthur A. Matthews. ’ ’ After the agreement was signed, appellant, Mr. … (People v. McCabe, 60 Cal.App.2d 492, 496 [ 141 P.2d 54, 57 ]; People v. Chamberlain, 96 Cal.App.2d 178, 182 [ 214 P.2d 600, 603 ].) It was stated in People v.

Brown v. Halbert

271 Cal. App. 2d 252 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1969

BROWN (H. C.), J. … Halbert was the chairman of the board of directors and manager of the corporation ■ other directors were Christensen, Morris H. Brown and W. 0. Willeford. The Halberts were each paid $500 per month as salary.

Wagy v. Brown

24 Cal. App. 4th 1 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1994

Wagy (plaintiff), individually and as guardian ad litem, sued James Franklin Brown and Ethel Brown (defendants) for personal injuries to herself and her minor children arising from an automobile accident. … Dickens v.

People v. Brown

3 Cal. App. 178 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1906

(People v. Lopez, 135 Cal. 25 , [ 66 Pac. 965 ] ; People v. Clark, 145 Cal. 730 , [ 79 Pac. 434 ].) … Proc., sec. 2047; Paige v. Carter, 64 Cal. 490 , [ 2 Pac. 260 ].)

Brown v. Hook

79 Cal. App. 2d 781 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 1947

F. v. … O’Neill v.

People v. Brown

62 Cal. App. 4th 493 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1998

Michael Dean Brown pled guilty to one count of possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377) and was placed on probation on the condition he serve 150 days in jail. … (U.S. v. Shabazz, supra, 993 F.2d at p. 436 ; accord, Florida v.

People v. Brown

61 Cal. App. 3d 476 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 1976

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … (See also People v.

Jones v. Brown

84 Cal. App. 2d 390 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1948

divergence of authority to the effect that if an attorhey is discharged for sufficient cause he is entitled to no more than the reasonable value of his services rendered prior to his discharge,” says the Supreme Court in Salopek v. … However, such suggested change has not been made, and the rule was again approved in Denio v.

People v. Brown

272 Cal. App. 2d 448 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1969

(People v. Mickelson, 59 Cal.2d 448 [ 30 Cal.Rptr. 18 , 380 P.2d 658 ]; People v. Martin, 46 Cal.2d 106 [ 293 P.2d 52 ]; People v. Blodgett, 46 Cal.2d 114 [ 293 P.2d 57 ].)” … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Coughlin, J., concurred.

Robertson v. Brown

37 Cal. App. 2d 189 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1940

(McLeod v. Dutton, supra.) … (Hall v. Mazzei, supra; Turner v. Standard Oil Co., supra.)

Brown v. Oxtoby

45 Cal. App. 2d 702 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1941

The rule in this connection is stated in Tarke v. … (Spreckels v. Gorrill, supra [ 152 Cal. 383 ( 92 Pac. 1011 )] ; Teague v. Hall, 171 Cal. 668 [ 154 Pac. 851 ] ; French v. Freeman, 191 Cal. 579 [ 217 Pac. 515 ]; Lillis v. Silver Creek etc. Water Co., 21 Cal.

Brown v. Swickard

163 Cal. App. 3d 820 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1985

{Lyons v. … (Brown v. Superior Court (1981) 124 Cal.App.3d 1059, 1061 [ 177 Cal.Rptr. 756 ].)

People v. Brown

116 Cal. App. 3d 820 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1981

Here, Brown’s reliance is upon the recent case of People v. Yarber (1979) 90 Cal.App.3d 895, 912-917 [ 153 Cal.Rptr. 875 ]. … (People v. Cole (1956) 47 Cal.2d 99, 103 [ 301 P.2d 854 , 56 A.L.R.2d 1435 ].) “In People v.

Goss v. Brown

64 Cal. App. 381 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1923

As said, in a somewhat similar situation, in Pittman v. Carstenbrook, 11 Cal. … A similar situation arose also in Wood, Curtis & Co. v.

Brown v. Busch

152 Cal. App. 2d 200 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1957

“Mortgages,” p. 959, § 572; Kleckner v. … Bank v.

Brown v. Bozeman

138 Cal. App. 133 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 1934

In Reams v. … If the decision in Warren Brothers Co. v. Boyle, supra, conflicts with the decisions in Reams v. Cooley, supra, Gamewell Fire Alarm Tel. Co. v. Los Angeles, supra, and Strauch v.

Wells v. Brown

97 Cal. App. 2d 361 · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 1950

(Camozzi v. Colusa Sandstone Co., 26 Cal.App. 74 [ 147 P. 107, 112 ]; Worley v. Spreckels Bros. Commercial Co., 163 Cal. 60 [ 124 P. 697 ]; Verdelli v. Gray’s Harbor etc. … (See, also, Hume v. Fresno Irrigation Dist., 21 Cal.App.2d 348 [ 69 P.2d 483 ]; Estate of Hellier, 169 Cal. 77 [ 145 P. 1008 ] ; Hopping v. City of Redwood City, 14 Cal. App.2d 360 [ 58 P.2d 379 ] ; Leoni v.

People v. Brown

205 Cal. App. 2d 188 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1962

As stated in People v. … (See People v. Simon, supra, 45 Cal.2d 645, 649 ; and People v. Brown, supra, 45 Cal.2d 640, 642 .)

People v. Brown

37 Cal. App. 101 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1918

The point now before us seems to be within the rule announced in People v. Griesheimer, 176 Cal. 44 , [ 167 Pac. 531 ]. … This language of the information brings the case within the terms of the opinion in People v. Griesheimer, from which quotation is above made.

Guild v. Brown

115 Cal. App. 374 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 8, 1931

In Billig v. Southern Pac. … Quoting from Billig v. Southern Pac.