Case law

Lassen v. Board of Dental Examiners

24 Cal. App. 767 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 1914

(Christopher v. Condogeorge, 128 Cal. 581 , [ 61 Pac. 174 ]; Benepe v. Scheidegger, 32 Mont. 424 , [ 80 Pac. 1024, 1026 ].) … Supp, 556]; Keiley *771 v. Barron, 87 App. Div. 317 , [ 84 N. Y. Supp. 306 ] ; Muirhead v. Sands, 111 Mich. 487 , [ 69 N. W. 826 ].)

Miller v. Board of Supervisors

121 Cal. App. 3d 184 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1981

She was thereupon discharged, and the defendant Board of Supervisors of Trinity County refused to reinstate her. The trial court granted her petition and mandated reinstatement with back pay.

Noble v. Franchise Tax Board

13 Cal. Rptr. 3d 363 · California Court of Appeal · May 11, 2004

To what extent, if any, the court gives deference to the conclusions of the FTB and Board of Equalization depends upon a number of factors. (See Yamaha Corp. of America v. … (Chapman v.

Brown v. St. Paul Consolidated Oil Co.

101 Cal. App. 263 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 1929

Did the new board concur with the previous board action? … In Shannon v.

Franchise Tax Board v. Superior Court

221 Cal. App. 4th 647 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 2013

FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Union, Local 1000 v. Brown (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 252, 27 273 and decisions cited.)

Rinaldo v. Board of Medical Examiners

123 Cal. App. 712 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1932

Based upon a complaint filed with the appellant Board of Medical Examiners, and after a hearing had thereon, the said board ordered a revocation of a former license theretofore granted by it to respondent Rinaldo to practice … App. 59 [ 214 Pac. 284 ]; State Bar v. Hull, 103 Cal. App. 302 [ 284 Pac. 492 ]; In re Mash, 28 Cal. App. 692 [ 153 Pac. 961 ].)

Bleeck v. State Board of Optometry

18 Cal. App. 3d 415 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1971

Slate Board of Optometry and Oakley v. State Board of Optometry, reported in 235 A.C.A. 747.” … (Rich v. State Board of Optometry, supra, 242 Cal.App.2d 598 .)

Murrill v. State Board of Accountancy

97 Cal. App. 2d 709 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1950

Foster v. … In Watson v.

Hahn v. Board of Education

205 Cal. App. 3d 744 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1988

(Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at pp. 591-592 [33 L.Ed.2d at p.569] [dis. opn. of Justice Marshall]; see also Lucas v. … (Hoyme v. Board of Education (1980) 107 Cal.App.3d 449 [ 165 Cal.Rptr. 737 ].)

Anderson v. Board of Medical Examiners

117 Cal. App. 113 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 1931

to practice a system and mode of treating the sick and afflicted, the said Clodine Brown being then and there without and not having a valid unrevoked certificate of license from the Board of Medical Examiners of the State … Jur. 1063; Suckow v. Alderson, supra; Dyment v. Board of Medical Examiners, 57 Cal. App. 260 [ 207 Pac. 409, 411 ].)

Bold v. Board of Medical Examiners

135 Cal. App. 29 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1933

(See, also, State v. Lewis, supra; In re Barach, 279 Pa. 89 [ 123 Atl. 727 ]; Lanterman v. Anderson, 36 Cal. App. 472, 478 [ 172 Pac. 625 ] ; In re Vaughan, 189 Cal. 491, 496 [ 209 Pac. 353 , 24 A. L. R. 858].) … (Suckow v. Alderson, 182 Cal. 247 [ 187 Pac. 965 ]; Lanterman v. Anderson, supra.)

Harpham v. Board of Supervisors

41 Cal. App. 192 · California Court of Appeal · May 13, 1919

That petition was presented to the board of supervisors on April 7, 1916. … It was so held in Pasadena Park Improvement Co. v. Lelande, 175 Cal. 511 , [ 166 Pac. 341 ], where the point is decided and the reasons fully stated.

Manning v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

10 Cal. App. 3d 655 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1970

Applicant urges that Ramsey v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 2 Cal. App.3d 693 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 51 ], and Langer v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (Gobel v. Industrial Acc. Com., 1 Cal.2d 100, 103 [ 33 P.2d 413 ]; Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 211 Cal. 154, 160-161 [ 294 P. 703 , 72 A.L.R. 1118 ]; see Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Ratto v. Board of Trustees

76 Cal. App. 276 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1926

Said Board of Trustees refused to act upon said petition and thereupon application was made to this court for a writ of mandate to compel said Board to call said special election as demanded in said recall petition. … The demurrer was overruled and the legal questions involved in the proceeding were disposed of at that time (Ratto v. Board of Trustees of the City of South San Francisco, 75 Cal.

Cozad v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

153 Cal. App. 2d 249 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1957

State Board of Medical Examiners, 143 Cal.App.2d 702 [ 300 P.2d 197 ]; and Hewitt v. State Board of Medical Examiners, supra. … Drucker v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 143 Cal.App.2d 702 [ 300 P.2d 197 ], does not aid appellant in the case at bar.

Vestal v. State Personnel Board

178 Cal. App. 2d 920 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1960

Pursuant to a stipulation of counsel the matter was submitted to the board on the testimony given before it and upon the record in the case of People v. … (People v. Wallin, 34 Cal.2d 777, 781 [ 215 P.2d 1 ] ; People v. Frankfort, 114 Cal.App.2d 680, 700 [ 251 P.2d 401 ].)

O'HAGAN v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

38 Cal. App. 3d 722 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 1974

On February 16, 1961, the board of zoning adjustment (“Board”) issued a temporary use permit. … Santa Barbara, supra, p. 783 ; Brougher v. Board of Public Works (1928) 205 Cal. 426, 433 [ 271 P. 487 ]) or if there is a compelling public necessity (Jones v.

McCarthy v. Board of Fire Commissioners

37 Cal. App. 495 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 1918

E. 809 ]; Rich v. Keyser, 54 Pa. St. 86, 89; Thomas v. Joplin, 14 Cal. App. 662 , [ 112 Pac. 729 ].) … (McClain v. Hutton, 131 Cal. 143 , [ 61 Pac. 273 , 63 Pac. 182 , 622]; Robbins v. Omnibus Railroad, 32 Cal. 472, 474 ; Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Woodhams, 29 Cal. App. 356, 361 , [ 156 Pac. 62 ].)

King v. State Board of Equalization

22 Cal. App. 3d 1006 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1972

(See, e.g., Kamp v. Johnson (1940) 15 Cal.2d 187 [ 99 P.2d 274 ]; Overly Mfg. Co. v. State Board of Equal. (1961) 191 Cal.App.2d 20 [ 12 Cal.Rptr. 391 ].) … (Levine v. State Board of Equalization (1956) 142 Cal.App.2d 760, 768 [ 299 P.2d 738 ]; Gen. Elec. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, supra, 111 Cal.App.2d at p. 187 .)

Baker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

18 Cal. App. 3d 852 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 22, 1971

“The referee and appeals board ‘must accept as true the intended meaning of [evidence] both uncontradicted and unimpeached.’ ” (LeVesque v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 1 Cal.3d 627, 639 ; McAllister v. … The board’s failings in the foregoing respects violated both the spirit and letter of Labor Code section 5908.5. (Goytia v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 1 Cal.3d 889, 893 ; see Lundberg v. Workmen’s Comp. App.