Case law

Montgomery v. Board of Administration, Etc.

34 Cal. App. 2d 514 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 11, 1939

Board of Administration. The system shall be managed by a Board of Administration which is hereby Created, . . . “The Board of Administration may establish such rules and regulations as it may deem proper; . . . … The construction of a statute by an administrative board cannot change its clear language or alter its plain meaning. (Hodge *522 v. McCall, supra; People v. Kerber, 152 Gal. 731 [ 93 Pac. 878 , 125 Am. St.

Savelli v. Board of Medical Examiners

229 Cal. App. 2d 124 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 1964

(Lay v. State Board of Osteopathic Examiners, supra, 179 Cal.App.2d 356 , 357; Mann v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 31 Cal.2d 30, 40 ; Arwine v. Board of Medical Examiners, 151 Cal. 499, 503 [ 91 P. 319 ].) … (Boren v. State Personnel Board, supra, at p. 637.)

Wagner v. State Board of Equalization

1 Cal. App. 2d 757 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1934

The evidence taken before the respondent board upon the hearing of the application of the petitioner for an “on sale” wine and beer license is practically identical with the testimony introduced in the case of Parente v. … State Board of Equalization, Civil No. 5219 (ante, p. 238 [ 36 Pac. (2d) 437 ]), this day decided, to which reference is hereby made.

Walter Camp v. Board of Supervisors

123 Cal. App. 3d 334 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 1, 1981

V, § 13.) … (Southern California Edison Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1972) 7 Cal.3d 652, 659, fn. 8 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 766 , 419 P.2d 1014 ]; Parsons v.

Murphy v. Board of Medical Examiners

75 Cal. App. 2d 161 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1946

In the late case of Webster v. … (See, also, Suckow v. Alderson [Board of Medical Examiners] 182 Cal. 247, 251 [ 187 P. 965 ]; Jordan v. Alderson [Board of Medical Examiners], 48 Cal.App. 547, 549 [ 192 P. 170 ].)

Wilson v. State Board of Education

89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 745 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 1999

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ].) … (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 180 .)

Endo v. State Board of Equalization

143 Cal. App. 2d 395 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1956

(Cooper v. State Board of Equalization, 137 Cal.App.2d 672, 678 [ 290 P.2d 914 ]. See also Cornell v. Reilly, 127 Cal.App. 2d 178, 186 [ 273 P.2d 572 ]; Swegle v. … See Covert v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125, 131 [ 173 P.2d 545 ]; Chosick v. Reilly, 125 Cal.App. 2d 334, 338 [ 270 P.2d 547 ].)

Dyment v. Board of Medical Examiners

57 Cal. App. 260 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1922

W. 425 ]; Board of Medical Examiners v. Eisen, 61 Or. 492 [ 123 Pac. 52 ]: Richardson v. Simpson, 88 Kan. 684 [43 L. R. A. (N. S.) 911, 129 Pac. 1128 ]; Freeman v. State Board, 54 Okl. 531 [L. R. … Frink, supra; Richardson v. Simpson, supra; Freemam v. State Board, supra). This the complaint now before us does not do.

Benor v. Board of Medical Examiners

8 Cal. App. 3d 542 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1970

Appellant, State Board of Medical Examiners, has appealed from a judgment of the superior court mandating it to issue a license to respondent to engage in the practice of psychology. We affirm the judgment. … Section 2906 provides: “The committee shall waive the examination and the board shall grant a license to any of the following persons: (a) All persons holding a valid certificate . . .

Pickwick Stages v. Board of Trustees

54 Cal. App. 730 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1921

(Lewis v. Hayes, 165 Cal. 527 [Ann. Cas. 1914D, 148, 132 Pac. 1022 ] ; Davis v. Hearst, 160 Cal. 143 [ 116 Pac. 530 ].)

Brougher v. Board of Public Works

107 Cal. App. 15 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1930

App. 443 [ 274 Pac. 397]; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 497 [ 234 Pac. 388 ]). … A. 1916B, 1248, 132 Pac. 584 ]; Ex parte Quong Wo, 161 Cal. 220 [ 118 Pac. 714 ] ; Brown v. City of Los Angeles, 183 Cal. 783, 790 [ 192 Pac. 716 ]).

Swehla v. Teachers' Retirement Board

192 Cal. App. 3d 1088 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1987

(Dresser v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 130 Cal.App.3d 506, 510-511 [ 181 Cal.Rptr. 797 ]; Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners (1968) 68 Cal.2d 67, 72 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 785 , 435 P.2d 553 ].) … In Wolfman v. Board of Trustees (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 787 [196 Cal.Rptr 395], the court was presented with a case involving an elementary school teacher who suffered from asthma and chronic bronchitis.

Wilhelm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

255 Cal. App. 2d 30 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 5, 1967

The board could not have achieved a substantial understanding of the record without reviewing the evidence on the issue of exposure. (Fibreboard Paper etc. Corp. v. Industrial Acc. … Appeals Board, 245 Cal.App.2d 334, 335 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 848 ]; Allied Comp. Ins. Co. v. Indus *30 trial Acc. Com., supra, 57 Cal.2d 115, 119-120 .)

Epstein v. California Horse Racing Board

222 Cal. App. 2d 831 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 1963

If there was such evidence, the board’s findings and decision should be upheld, (Shepherd v. State Personnel Board, supra, 48 Cal.2d 41, 46 ; Covert v. … Brown in investing money in a real estate venture which respondent was promoting.

Geijsbeek v. Board of Equalization

222 Cal. App. 2d 234 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1963

(Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. Johnson, 21 Cal.2d 135 [ 130 P.2d 421 ]; Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Johnson, 54 Cal.App.2d 297 [ 129 P.2d 32 ]; Savage v. Commonwealth, 186 Va. 1012 [ 45 S.E.2d 313 ].) … (In re Bush, supra; Ingels v. Riley, 5 Cal.2d 154, 163-164 [ 53 P.2d 939 , 103 A.L.R. 1 ]; Yosemite Park & Curry Co. v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 177 Cal.App.2d 448, 457 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 431 ].)

Findleton v. Board of Supervisors

12 Cal. App. 4th 709 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 20, 1993

Appellant Robert Findleton, the owner of a parcel of real property in El Dorado County (County), petitioned the trial court for a writ of mandate to order respondent County Board of Supervisors (Board) to issue him a certificate … As we said in Hunt v. County of Shasta (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 432 [ 275 Cal.Rptr. 113 ], “If the board determines that the property complies, it must issue a certificate of compliance so stating.”

Ezzy v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

146 Cal. App. 3d 252 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1983

Goodman v. … The decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board is annulled and the cause is remanded to that board for proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein. Miller, J., concurred.

Furnish v. Board of Medical Examiners

149 Cal. App. 2d 326 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1957

Code, § 2372; 2 Cal.Jur.2d, Administrative Law, p. 393; Fuller v. Board of Medical Examiners, 14 Cal.App.2d 734, 737-738 [ 59 P.2d 171 ]; King v. … Board of Medical Examiners, 65 Cal.App.2d 644, 652 [ 151 P.2d 282 ]; Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Examiners, 216 Cal. 285, 300 [ 14 P.2d 67 ] ; Black v.

Cooper v. State Board of Equalization

137 Cal. App. 2d 672 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 9, 1955

In Mantzoros v. … In Cornell v.

English v. Board of Administration

148 Cal. App. 3d 839 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1983

(Bixby v. Pierno (1971) 4 Cal.3d 130 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 234 , 481 P.2d 242 ].) The disability pension at issue here is such a vested right. (Strumsky v. … (Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].)