Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.19s

  • Comings v. State Board of Education

    23 Cal. App. 3d 94 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1972

    (Morrison v. State Board of Education, supra, 1 Cal. 3d 214 at pp. 218, 230, 235 ; Governing Board v. Brennan, supra, 18 Cal. … (Morrison v. State Board of Education, supra, at pp. 235, 237; 13 Board of Trustees v. Stubblefield, supra, at p. 826 .)

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Parente v. State Board of Equalization

    1 Cal. App. 2d 238 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1934

    Basing his argument upon section 22 of article XX of the Constitution, being the amendment adopted November 8, 1932, effective December 5, 1933, and the case of Sandelin v. … After setting forth in full section 22 of article XX of the Constitution, the Supreme Court, in the case of Sandelin v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • McPheeters v. Board of Medical Examiners

    103 Cal. App. 297 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1930

    (Hewitt v. Board of Medical Examiners, 148 Cal. 590 [ 113 Am. St. Rep. 315 , 3 L. R. A. (N. S.) 896, 84 Pac. 39 ].) … (Kurg v. Empire etc. Co., 148 Vt. 585 [58 A. L. R. 193, 139 S. E. 478 ] ; Gildersleeve v. Neuton Steel Co., 109 Ohio St. 341 [ 142 N. E. 678 ].)

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Board of Dental Examiners

    53 Cal. App. 3d 283 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1975

    Rich v. State Board of Optometry, 235 Cal.App.2d 591, 603 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 512 ].) Such a statement, even though would appear to be admissible. (See Friends of Mammoth v. … Board of Supervisors, 8 Cal.3d 247, 257-258 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].) It constitutes some indication at least of the probable intent of the Legislature. (See Jennison, Exr. v.

    Disapproved in part by California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College District, 28 Cal. 3d 692 (1981)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Socialist Workers 1974 California Campaign Committee v. Brown

    53 Cal. App. 3d 879 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1975

    (See Buckley v. Valeo, supra, 519 F.2d at p. 867 ; Brown v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3d 509, 524 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 584 , 487 P.2d 1224 ]; Canon v. … (See Patterson v. Board of Supervisors (1875) 50 Cal. 344, 345 ; State Bd. of Barber Examiners v. Star (1970) 8 Cal.App.3d 736, 739-740 [ 87 Cal.Rptr. 450 ]; Paul v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Pickwick Stages v. Board of Trustees

    54 Cal. App. 730 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1921

    (Lewis v. Hayes, 165 Cal. 527 [Ann. Cas. 1914D, 148, 132 Pac. 1022 ] ; Davis v. Hearst, 160 Cal. 143 [ 116 Pac. 530 ].)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown CA2/8

    California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 2022

    Filed 7/27/22 Brown v. … No. 19STCV28753) v. JESSICA MARIE BROWN, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Barbara A. Meiers, Judge. Affirmed. George M.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Swehla v. Teachers' Retirement Board

    192 Cal. App. 3d 1088 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1987

    (Dresser v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 130 Cal.App.3d 506, 510-511 [ 181 Cal.Rptr. 797 ]; Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners (1968) 68 Cal.2d 67, 72 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 785 , 435 P.2d 553 ].) … In Wolfman v. Board of Trustees (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 787 [196 Cal.Rptr 395], the court was presented with a case involving an elementary school teacher who suffered from asthma and chronic bronchitis.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pearsall v. Board of Administration

    86 Cal. App. 3d 125 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 10, 1978

    Pearsall appeals from judgment denying petition for writ of mandamus to require the Board of Administration, Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS), to credit him with four years of military service in the computation … In 1945 the City of Pasadena had brought its employees into the ambit of PERS through the execution of a contract between its board of directors and PERS.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Young v. State Board of Equalization

    90 Cal. App. 2d 256 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1949

    to the board for further proceedings. … (Covert v. Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125, 132 [ 173 P.2d 545 ].) Judgment affirmed. Barnard, P. J., and Griffin, J., concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied March 9, 1949.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Moore v. State Board of Equalization

    76 Cal. App. 2d 758 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 12, 1946

    Since the briefing of this appeal the Supreme Court has decided the companion . cases of Covert v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125 [ 173 P.2d 545 ], and Reynolds v. … In Hansen v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Vagim v. Board of Supervisors

    230 Cal. App. 2d 286 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1964

    The trial court granted the writ and the matter was appealed, resulting in the decision in Mueller v. Brown, 221 Cal.App.2d 319 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 474 ], denying the writ. … Finally, petitioner seeks to relitigate the matters determined by the decision of the District Court of Appeal for the Fifth Appellate District in the ease of Mueller v. Brown, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Swepston v. State Personnel Board

    195 Cal. App. 3d 92 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1987

    (Martin v. Henderson, supra, 40 Cal.2d at p. 589 .) “Implementing this limitation, the board also specifically prohibited additional payment to any employee for overtime.” (Ibid.) … (Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County Dist.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • English v. Board of Administration

    148 Cal. App. 3d 839 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1983

    (Bixby v. Pierno (1971) 4 Cal.3d 130 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 234 , 481 P.2d 242 ].) The disability pension at issue here is such a vested right. (Strumsky v. … (Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Zorrero v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

    47 Cal. App. 3d 434 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 1975

    Relying on Perales v. … Portland Cement Co. v. Cal. Unemp. Ins. Appeals Board, supra, 178 Cal.App.2d 263, at p. 274 .)

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Fuller v. Board of Medical Examiners

    14 Cal. App. 2d 734 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1936

    (Randall v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 110 Cal. App. 61 [ 293 Pac. 790 ]; McPheeters v. Board of Medical Examiners, 103 Cal. App. 297 [ 284 Pac. 938 ]; Messner v. Board of Dental Examiners, 87 Cal. … (Garvin v. Chambers, 195 Cal. 212 [ 232 Pac. 696 ]; Central Pacific R. R. Co. v. Board of Equalization, 43 Cal. 365 ; Winning v. Board of Dental Examiners, 114 Cal. App. 658 [ 300 Pac. 866 ].)

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Walter Camp v. Board of Supervisors

    123 Cal. App. 3d 334 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 1, 1981

    V, § 13.) … (Southern California Edison Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1972) 7 Cal.3d 652, 659, fn. 8 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 766 , 419 P.2d 1014 ]; Parsons v.

    Cited 64 timesPublished
  • McColgan v. Board of Police Commissioners

    130 Cal. App. 66 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1933

    She cites and relies on Buckley v. Roche, 214 Cal. 241 [ 4 Pac. (2d) 929 ], and Casserly v. City of Oakland, 215 Cal. 600 [ 12 Pac. (2d) 425 ]. … The power to hear and determine such application is by section 4, chapter X, of article VIII, of the Charter clearly vested in the defendant board (Mogan v. Board of Police Commrs., supra), and not the courts.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Shea v. Board of Medical Examiners

    81 Cal. App. 3d 564 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1978

    (Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; McLaughlin v. Board of Medical Examiners (1973) 35 Cal.App.3d 1010, 1013 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 353 ]; Grannis v. … (Cartwright v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, supra, 16 Cal.3d at p. 767; Board of Education v. Swan, supra, 41 Cal.2d at p. 553 .)

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Dyment v. Board of Medical Examiners

    57 Cal. App. 260 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1922

    W. 425 ]; Board of Medical Examiners v. Eisen, 61 Or. 492 [ 123 Pac. 52 ]: Richardson v. Simpson, 88 Kan. 684 [43 L. R. A. (N. S.) 911, 129 Pac. 1128 ]; Freeman v. State Board, 54 Okl. 531 [L. R. … Frink, supra; Richardson v. Simpson, supra; Freemam v. State Board, supra). This the complaint now before us does not do.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.