Case law

Gillies v. Civil Service Board

99 Cal. App. 3d 417 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1979

(Warren v. State Personnel Board (1979) 94 Cal.App.3d 95, 106 [ 156 Cal.Rptr. 351 ].) … (Board of Education v. Jack M. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 691, 698-699 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 700 , 566 P.2d 602 ]; Vielehr v. State Personnel Bd. (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 187, 193-194 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 852 ]; Warren v.

Mast v. State Board of Optometry

139 Cal. App. 2d 78 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1956

(Kendall v. Board of Osteopathic Examiners, 105 Cal.App.2d 239 [ 233 P.2d 107 ]; Ashdown v. State, 135 *85 Cal.App.2d 291 [ 287 P.2d 176 ] ; Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners, 17 Cal.2d 534, 539 [ 110 P.2d 992 ].) … (Bonham v. McConnell, 45 Cal.2d 304 [ 288 P.2d 502 ]; Cooper v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 35 Cal.2d 242 [ 217 P.2d 630 , 18 A.L.R.2d 593 ]; *92 Nelson v.

Ogilvie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

197 Cal. App. 4th 1262 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 2011

Because we cannot conclude on this record whether Wanda Ogilvie effectively rebutted application of the rating schedule, we reverse the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB), annul the award of benefits … Co. v. Workmen's Comp. App.

Worthington v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

64 Cal. App. 3d 384 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 1976

State Colleges, 237 Cal.App.2d 530 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 73 ]; Meyer v. Board of Trustees, 195 Cal.App.2d 420, 431 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 717 ]; Smith v. Municipal Court, 167 Cal.App.2d 534, 539 [ 334 P.2d 931 ]; California Grape etc. … Board of Medical Examiners, 6 Cal.App.3d 716, 724 [ 86 Cal.Rptr. 245 ].) Appellant places much reliance on the decision in People v.

Schultz v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

232 Cal. App. 4th 1126 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 6, 2015

ADJ582920) v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and JOINT TEST TACTICS AND TRAINING (JT3) et al., Respondents. … No appearance for Respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. England, Ponticello & St. Clair and Terry S.

Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing Board

1 Cal. App. 4th 218 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1991

Improvement Dist. v. Board of Supervisors (1980) 112 Cal.App.3d 545 [ 169 Cal.Rptr. 391 ] (Solvang).) … (Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Air Resources Board, supra, 128 Cal.App.3d at p. 795 .)

Garfield v. Board of Medical Examiners

99 Cal. App. 2d 219 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 1950

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, p. 309.) … (See Cooper v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 35 Cal.2d 242 [ 217 P.2d 630 ].)

Stop the Casino 101 Coalition v. Brown

California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 2014

(See, e.g., Coso Energy Developers v. … I, § 8, cl. 3; Carcieri v. Kempthorne (1st Cir. 2007) 497 F.3d 15, 39, revd. on other grounds sub nom. Carcieri v.

Thille v. Board of Public Works

82 Cal. App. 187 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1927

Board of Public Works, supra, was also quoted in the case of Zahn v. … But we observe from a careful examination of both the case of Miller v. Board of Public Works, supra, Zahn v. Board of Public Works, supra, and Euclid v.

Brite v. Board of Supervisors

21 Cal. App. 2d 233 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1937

In Felker v. Board of Commrs. of Elk County, 70 Kan. 96 [ 78 Pac. 167 , 3 Ann. … (Hanger v. City of Bes Moines, 52 Iowa, 193 [ 2 N. W. 1105 , 35 Am. Rep. 266 ] ; Gale v. Inhabitants of South Berwick, 51 Me. 174 ; Board of Commissioners v. Bradford, 72 Ind. 455 [ 37 Am. Rep. 174 ]; Mountain v.

Paine v. Franchise Tax Board

12 Cal. Rptr. 3d 729 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 2004

(See Ford Motor Co. v. … (See Daks v.

Anderson v. Board of Dental Examiners

27 Cal. App. 336 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1915

It has been held that courts will take judicial' notice of their records and officers (Hollenbach v. Schnabel, 101 Cal. 312 , [ 40 Am. St. Rep. 57 , 35 Pac. 872 ]; Pitkin v. Cowen, 91 Fed. 599 ; Dyer v. … Thus in People v. Board of Excise, 46 N. Y. Supp. 741 ; 17 Misc.

Matlovsky v. Board of Retirement

149 Cal. App. 3d 1069 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1983

That statute has been construed in a series of cases, including Gelman v. … Zemke v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 68 Cal.2nd 794, 801 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 88 , 441 P.2d 928 ]; Place v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Montgomery v. Board of Administration, Etc.

34 Cal. App. 2d 514 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 11, 1939

Board of Administration. The system shall be managed by a Board of Administration which is hereby Created, . . . “The Board of Administration may establish such rules and regulations as it may deem proper; . . . … The construction of a statute by an administrative board cannot change its clear language or alter its plain meaning. (Hodge *522 v. McCall, supra; People v. Kerber, 152 Gal. 731 [ 93 Pac. 878 , 125 Am. St.

Cooper v. Board of Medical Examiners

49 Cal. App. 3d 931 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 18, 1975

(Brown v. Cohn (1974) 11 Cal.3d 639, 646-647 [ 114 Cal.Rptr. 128 , 522 P.2d 688 ].) … (Brown v.

Savelli v. Board of Medical Examiners

229 Cal. App. 2d 124 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 1964

(Lay v. State Board of Osteopathic Examiners, supra, 179 Cal.App.2d 356 , 357; Mann v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 31 Cal.2d 30, 40 ; Arwine v. Board of Medical Examiners, 151 Cal. 499, 503 [ 91 P. 319 ].) … (Boren v. State Personnel Board, supra, at p. 637.)

Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners

219 Cal. App. 2d 504 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1963

(Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 238-239 [ 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796, 801-802 , 64 A.L.R.2d 288 ]; Truax v. Raich, 239 U.S. 33, 41 [ 36 S.Ct. 7 , 60 L.Ed. 131, 135 ]; Bautista v. … (State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, 40 Cal.2d 436, 443 [ 254 P.2d 29 ].) The law must not be arbitrary; it must rest upon “adequate reason.” (State Board of Dry Cleaners v.

Boling v. Public Employment Relations Board

10 Cal. App. 5th 853 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 2017

In the proceedings below, the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) determined City was obliged to "meet and confer" pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) (Gov. … (See Perry v. Brown (2011) 52 Cal.4th 1116, 1125; see also Amwest Surety Ins. Co. v. Wilson (1995) 11 Cal.4th 1243, 1250.)

Gee v. California State Personnel Board

5 Cal. App. 3d 713 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1970

(Shepherd v. State Personnel Board, 48 Cal.2d 41, 46 [ 307 P.2d 4 ]; Tabory v. State Personnel Board, 208 Cal.App.2d 543, 545 [ 25 Cal.Rptr. 333 ].) … (Orlandi v. State Personnel Board, 263 Cal.App.2d 32, 37 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 177 ].) 3.

Allan v. Board of Administration

55 Cal. App. 2d 815 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 1942

mandate would not be a proper remedy except to correct a manifest abuse of discretion on the part of the board of administration. … this section, and the determination of said board shall be final and conclusive.”