Case law

Kerlin v. Board of Administration

90 Cal. App. 3d 317 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 21, 1979

However, “[u]pon revocation of any beneficiary designation, a member may designate the same or another beneficiary by a writing filed with the board.” … Aside from her moral outrage, plaintiff cites Frazier v. Tulare County Bd. of Retirement (1974) 42 Cal.App.3d 1046 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 386 ], in support of her constitutional contract infringement argument.

Wittman v. Board of Police Commissioners

19 Cal. App. 229 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1912

Rep. 605]; Harrigan v. Home Life Co., 128 Cal. 531, 548 , [ 58 Pac. 180 , 61 Pac. 99 ]; Union Sav. Bank of San Jose v. Leiter, 145 Cal. 696 , [ 79 Pac. 441 ] ; San Luis Obispo v. … Gage, 139 Cal. 398 , [ 73 Pac. 174 ]; Barnes v. Glide, 117 Cal. 1 , [ 59 Am. St. Rep. 153 , 48 Pac. 804 ].)

Nicholson-Brown, Inc. v. City of San Jose

62 Cal. App. 3d 526 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 14, 1976

(See MacIsaac & Menke Co. v. Cardox Corp. (1961) 193 Cal.App.2d 661, 673 [ 14 Cal.Rptr. 523 ].) Denial of prejudgment interest to Nicholson-Brown against the City was proper. … (McNutt v. City of Los Angeles (1921) 187 Cal. 245, 259 [ 201 P. 592 ]; Perkins v. Blauth (1912) 163 Cal. 782, 793 [ 127 P. 50 ]; Estate of Piercy (1914) 168 Cal. 755, 758 [ 145 P. 91 ] [dictum]; Cox v.

Daks v. Franchise Tax Board

85 Cal. Rptr. 2d 927 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1999

(Wilson v. … (Altman & Keesling, Allocation of Income in State Taxation (2d ed. 1950) pp. 54-55.) 6 Daks’s reliance on Borchers v. Franchise Tax Board (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 504 [ 198 Cal.Rptr. 734 ], is misplaced.

Rodie v. Board of Administration

115 Cal. App. 3d 559 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1981

(Campbell v. … Strumsky v.

Perez v. Board of Police Commissioners

78 Cal. App. 2d 638 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1947

“In Hayman v. … See, also, National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 154 F.2d 932 . Fraternal Order of Police v. Harris, 306 Mich. 68 [ 10 N.W.2d 310 ]; City of Jackson v. McLeod, - Miss. - [ 24 So.2d 319 ].

Stevens v. Board of Education

9 Cal. App. 3d 1017 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1970

(Chinn v. Superior Court, 156 Cal. 478, 482 [ 105 P. 580 ]; cf. Sacramento Newspaper Guild v. Sacramento County Board of Supervisors, 263 Cal.App.2d 41, 47 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 480 ], and Savage v. … (Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. Quinn, 54 Cal.2d 507, 509-510 [ 6 Cal.Rptr. 545 , 354 P.2d 1 ].) Other cases refer to applications before local boards of equalization as administrative remedies. (Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v.

Anders v. State Board of Equalization

82 Cal. App. 2d 88 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1947

(Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 25 Cal.2d 918 [ 156 P.2d 1 ].) … We think the construction of the board in this case is in accordance with the law. Likewise, the ease of Herbert’s Laurel-Ventura Corporation v.

Miller v. Board of Supervisors

121 Cal. App. 3d 184 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1981

She was thereupon discharged, and the defendant Board of Supervisors of Trinity County refused to reinstate her. The trial court granted her petition and mandated reinstatement with back pay.

Mogan v. Board of Police Commissioners

100 Cal. App. 270 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 6, 1929

Los Angeles, 133 Cal. 338 [ 65 Pac. 749 ]; People v. … This principle is recognized in Dufton v.

Wilson v. Franchise Tax Board

20 Cal. App. 4th 1441 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1993

Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd. (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 784, 794 [ 280 Cal.Rptr. 362 ].) … Likewise, Stemkowski v. C. I. R. (2d Cir. 1982) 690 F.2d 40 supports the Board.

Bleeck v. State Board of Optometry

18 Cal. App. 3d 415 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1971

Slate Board of Optometry and Oakley v. State Board of Optometry, reported in 235 A.C.A. 747.” … (Rich v. State Board of Optometry, supra, 242 Cal.App.2d 598 .)

Murrill v. State Board of Accountancy

97 Cal. App. 2d 709 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1950

Foster v. … In Watson v.

Sela v. Medical Board of Cal.

237 Cal. App. 4th 221 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 2015

Judicial Review of Board Disciplinary Decisions The court in Landau v. … (Zabetian v. Medical Board, supra, 80 Cal.App.4th at p. 466.)

Hahn v. Board of Education

205 Cal. App. 3d 744 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1988

(Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at pp. 591-592 [33 L.Ed.2d at p.569] [dis. opn. of Justice Marshall]; see also Lucas v. … (Hoyme v. Board of Education (1980) 107 Cal.App.3d 449 [ 165 Cal.Rptr. 737 ].)

Carrancho v. California Air Resources Board

4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 536 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 2003

(See Rodriguez v. Solis (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 495, 502 [ 2 Cal.Rptr.2d 50 ] (Rodriguez); California Teachers Assn. v. Ingwerson (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 860, 865 [ 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 917 ]; Transdyn/Cresci JV v. … In Friends of the Old Trees v.

Bley v. Board of Dental Examiners

101 Cal. App. 666 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 1929

The respondent filed in the Superior Court of San Joaquin County a petition for a writ of prohibition asking that the appellant, Board of Dental Examiners of the State of California, be restrained from proceeding to investigate … (Lancel v. Postlethwaite, 172 Cal. 326 [ 156 Pac. 486 ] ; Smith v. Questa, 58 Cal. App. 1, 4 [ 207 Pac. 1036 ]; Bates v. Ransome-Crummey Co., 42 Cal. App. 699 [ 184 Pac. 39 ]; Donaldson Inv. Co. v. Shay, 86 Cal.

Lantz v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

226 Cal. App. 4th 298 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 2014

ADJ8004482) v. OPINION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND et al., Respondents. … No appearance for Respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. Patricia A. Brown, Yvonne Hauscarriague and David M.

King v. State Board of Equalization

22 Cal. App. 3d 1006 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1972

(See, e.g., Kamp v. Johnson (1940) 15 Cal.2d 187 [ 99 P.2d 274 ]; Overly Mfg. Co. v. State Board of Equal. (1961) 191 Cal.App.2d 20 [ 12 Cal.Rptr. 391 ].) … (Levine v. State Board of Equalization (1956) 142 Cal.App.2d 760, 768 [ 299 P.2d 738 ]; Gen. Elec. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, supra, 111 Cal.App.2d at p. 187 .)

Werfel v. Franchise Tax Board

116 Cal. App. 2d 167 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1953

The appeals of United States and the California Franchise Tax Board are from the same order. … are the duties of an executor or administrator with respect to ascertaining and paying from assets of any particular estate federal and state tax claims which, under the decision of the California Supreme Court in People v.