Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.49s

  • Shacket v. Osteopathic Medical Board

    51 Cal. App. 4th 223 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 27, 1996

    Each respective board separately creates and maintains a central index of all persons holding a license, certificate or similar authority from such board. (§ 800, subd. (a).) … (See Evans v. Paye (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 265, 280-281, fn. 13 [ 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 915 ]; Black’s Law Dict. (6th ed. 1990) pp. 1189-1190; The American Heritage Dict. (1976) p. 1039, col. 2.)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Tivens v. Assessment Appeals Board

    31 Cal. App. 3d 945 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1973

    (Grant v. Board of Medical Examiners, 232 Cal.App.2d 820, 826 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 270 ].) … (Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. Quinn, supra, 54 Cal.2d at p. 511 ; see also Sherman v. Quinn, 31 Cal.2d 661 [ 192 P.2d 17 ]; Jillson v. Board of Supervisors, 221 Cal.App.2d 192, 195 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 419 ]; Deering, Cal.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Thrasher v. Board of Medical Examiners

    44 Cal. App. 26 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 1919

    In the case of Englebretson v. Industrial Acc. … (See, also, People v. Ah Yute, 54 Cal. 89 ; People v. Hartwell, 37 Cal. App. 799 , [ 175 Pac. 21 ].)

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Wolfman v. Board of Trustees

    148 Cal. App. 3d 787 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 7, 1983

    In Stuessel v. … (Barber v. Retirement Board, supra, 18 Cal.App.3d [273] at p. 278 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 657 ]; italics in original.)” (Id., at p. 1052.) In Hosford v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stirling v. Board of Supervisors

    48 Cal. App. 3d 184 · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 1975

    (Griffin v. Board of Supervisors, 60 Cal.2d 751 [ 36 Cal.Rptr. 616 , 388 P.2d 888 ].) … Brown, 63 Cal.2d 270 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 308 , 405 P.2d 132 ]; Reynolds v. Sims, supra.) Hence the zoning ordinance which prompted this litigation is not, on that basis, vulnerable to attack. The judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Moosa v. State Personnel Board

    126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 321 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 23, 2002

    (See Morrison v. State Board of Education (1969) 1 Cal.3d 214, 238 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 461 P.2d 375 ].) Here, the relevant facts are undisputed. … (Frazee v. Civil Service Board (1959) 170 Cal.App.2d 333, 336 [ 338 P.2d 943 ]; see also Hingsbergen v. State Personnel Bd. (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 914, 920-921 [ 50 Cal.Rptr. 59 ].)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kast v. Board of Trustees

    222 Cal. App. 2d 8 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 1, 1963

    (See Saxton v. Board of Education (1929) 206 Cal. 758, 763 [ 276 P. 998 ]; Moody v. Board of Trustees (1937) 21 Cal.App.2d 171, 172 [ 68 P.2d 392 ] ; Hooper v. … (Aebli v. Board of Education, supra, and Fry v. Board of Education, supra.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sheehy v. State Personnel Board

    83 Cal. App. 3d 907 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 16, 1978

    Moreover, filing requirements before the State Personnel Board must be subject to the rule of strict compliance which requires that a petition or claim be disregarded if it is not timely filed. (Collins v. … (Wilson v. State Personnel Bd. (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 865, 870 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 292 ].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Perez v. Board of Police Commissioners

    78 Cal. App. 2d 638 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1947

    “In Hayman v. … See, also, National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 154 F.2d 932 . Fraternal Order of Police v. Harris, 306 Mich. 68 [ 10 N.W.2d 310 ]; City of Jackson v. McLeod, - Miss. - [ 24 So.2d 319 ].

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Chambers v. Board of Trustees

    38 Cal. App. 2d 561 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 1940

    Section 1.110 of the School Code provides as follows: “For the purposes set forth elsewhere in this Chapter, said Boards may appoint a physical inspector, or physical inspectors, as the Board may determine, to consist of … In Jones v. Board of Trustees, 8 Cal.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lyles v. Teachers Retirement Board

    219 Cal. App. 2d 523 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1963

    Language in Wicktor v. County of Los Angeles, 141 Cal.App.2d 592 , 596 et seq. [ 297 P.2d 115 ], Nichols v. Board of Retirement, 121 Cal.App.2d 176, 180 [ 262 P.2d 862 ], and Shaw v. … People v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Carrancho v. California Air Resources Board

    4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 536 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 2003

    (See Rodriguez v. Solis (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 495, 502 [ 2 Cal.Rptr.2d 50 ] (Rodriguez); California Teachers Assn. v. Ingwerson (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 860, 865 [ 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 917 ]; Transdyn/Cresci JV v. … In Friends of the Old Trees v.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Lantz v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    226 Cal. App. 4th 298 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 2014

    ADJ8004482) v. OPINION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND et al., Respondents. … No appearance for Respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. Patricia A. Brown, Yvonne Hauscarriague and David M.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Dixon v. Board of Trustees

    216 Cal. App. 3d 1269 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 1989

    (United Teachers of Ukiah v. Board of Education (1988) 201 Cal.App.3d 632, 640 [ 251 Cal.Rptr. 499 ].) … Board of Education, supra, 201 Cal.App.3d at pages 639-640, that, to the extent McCammon v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Beck v. Board of Administration

    136 Cal. App. 3d 1031 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 1982

    The question whether the beneficiary designated by section 21365.5 takes in preference to the person named as a beneficiary by the member was decided in Lee v. … As stated in Lee v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Garner v. Board of Public Works

    98 Cal. App. 2d 493 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 19, 1950

    L’Hommedieu v. Board of Regents of University of State of New York, 276 App.Div. 494 [ 95 N.Y.S.2d 443 ]. … Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Wade v. Board of Administration

    67 Cal. App. 2d 745 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1945

    In support of the above argument plaintiff cites the cases of Patton v. Board of Health, 127 Cal. 388 . [ 59 P. 702 , 78 Am.St.Rep. 66 ]; White v. City of Alameda, 124 Cal. 95 [ 56 P. 795 ]; and Empey v. … (See Coulter v. Pool, 187 Cal. 181 [ 201 P. 120 ]; Foucht v. Hirni, 57 Cal.App. 685 [ 208 P. 362 ]; Couts v. County of San Diego, 139 Cal.App. 706 [ 34 P.2d 812 ]; Patton v. Board of Health, supra; People v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Constantine v. Board of Education

    43 Cal. App. 2d 794 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1941

    App. (2d) 400 [ 44 Pac. (2d) 644 ] ; citing Gould v. Santa Ana High School Dist., 131 Cal. … Citing the case of Briney v. Santa Ana High School Dist., 131 Cal.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bryant v. State Personnel Board

    96 Cal. App. 2d 423 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 11, 1950

    On May 21,1947, he filed with the State Personnel Board an appeal from said notice of rejection. … In fact, Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rich v. State Board of Optometry

    235 Cal. App. 2d 591 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1965

    Board of Equalization, supra, p. 645 ; Shelby v. Southern Pac. … (Gilbertson v. McLean, 216 Ore. 629 [ 341 P.2d 139, 145 ] ; State Board of Barber Examiners v. Walker, 67 Ariz. 156 [ 192 P.2d 723, 728 ] ; Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v.

    Cited 117 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.