Case law

Feliciano v. Board of Administration

1 Cal. App. 4th 143 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1991

(Crumpler v. Board of Administration (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 567, 576 [ 108 Cal.Rptr. 293 ]; Toulumne County Deputy Sheriffs’ Assn. v. Board of Administration (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1236, 1238 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 824 ].) … (Charles v. Board of Administration (1991) 232 Cal.App.3d 1410, 1412-1414 [ 284 Cal.Rptr. 106 ].)

Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners

17 Cal. 4th 763 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1998

(Brown v. Poway Unified School Dist. (1993) 4 Cal.4th 820, 830 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 679 , 843 P.2d 624 ]; see Kennedy Wholesale, Inc. v. … (DaFonte v. UpRight, Inc. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 593, 604-605 [ 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 238 , 828 P.2d 140 ]; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 29.4(b).) Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Brown, J., and Croskey, J., * concurred.

Board of Directors v. Westenberg

55 Cal. App. 2d 484 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1942

(Parkside Realty Co. v. MacDonald, 167 Cal. 342 [ 139 P. 805 ] ; Field v. Hughes, 134 Cal.App. 325 [25 P.2d 241]; Linstead v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.App.2d 9 [ 61 P.2d 355 ].) … (Wallace v. Feeley, 61 How. Pr. (N.Y.) 225; Merrill v. Shaw, 5 Minn. 148 ; In re Thurber’s Estate, 162 N.Y. 244 [ 56 N.E. 631 ]; Stone v. Pratt, 90 Hun. 39 [ 35 N.Y. Supp. 519 ]; First Nat. Bank of Seneca v.

DiLoreto v. Board of Education

87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 791 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 1999

On September 25, 1996, appellant met with respondents Sussman, school board president Ferraro, and board member Hoffer. … (Brandon v. Board of Ed. of Guilderland Cent. Sch., supra, 635 F.2d at p. 980.)

Purdy v. Teachers' Retirement Board

113 Cal. App. 3d 942 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1980

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal. 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].) However, this court is not bound by the trial court’s findings to the extent they constitute conclusions of law. … (Henni gan v. United Pacific Ins. Co. (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 1, 7 [ 125 Cal.Rptr. 408 ], quoting from 45 Cal.Jur.2d, Statutes, § 128, p. 636.)

Martin v. Board of Administration

276 Cal. App. 2d 795 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1969

(Smith v. Trapp (1967) 249 Cal.App.2d 929, 936 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 229 ]; Eckman v. Arnold Taxi Co. (1944) 64 Cal.App.2d 229, 234 [ 148 P.2d 677 ].) Board of Administration v. … Literally, Government Code section 21455 applies to “actions brought by the board,” not to the board’s intervention or lien assertion in'the employee’s timely action.

Board of Education v. Cooper

136 Cal. App. 2d 513 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1955

Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485, 494 [ 72 S.Ct. 380 , 96 L.Ed. 517 , 27 A.L.R.2d 472 ] ; Garner v. Board of Public Works, 341 U.S. 716, 723-724 [ 71 S.Ct. 909 , 95 L.Ed. 1317 ] ; Gerende v. … (See Garner v. Board of Public Works, 341 U.S. 716, 719-720 [ 71 S.Ct. 909 , 95 L.Ed. 1317 ] ; Adler v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485, 492-493 [ 72 S.Ct. 380 , 96 L.Ed. 517 , 27 A.L.R.2d 472 ].)”

Messner v. Board of Dental Examiners

87 Cal. App. 199 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1927

In Coulter v. … (Jacobs v. Board of Dental Examiners, 189 Cal. 709, 714 [ 209 Pac. 1006 ].)

Bordenave v. Franchise Tax Board

158 Cal. App. 2d 291 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 1958

Plaintiff, appellant herein, brought this action against respondent, The Franchise Tax Board, to recover income taxes paid under protest. Appellant and her husband purchased a ranch near Stockton, California, in 1944. … (Blank v. Coffin, 20 Cal.2d 457, 460 [ 126 P.2d 868 ].) The Supreme Court in Hicks v.

McCoy v. Board of Retirement

183 Cal. App. 3d 1044 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 1986

(See Traub v. Board of Retirement, supra, 34 Cal.3d at pp. 798-799.) … Board of Retirement, supra; and Hoffman v.

Kupka v. Board of Administration

122 Cal. App. 3d 791 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 5, 1981

In Quattrone v. … Co. v. City of Santa Cruz (1961) 198 Cal.App.2d 267, 273 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 706 ]; Rombotis v. Fink (1948) 89 Cal.App.2d 378, 386, 391 [ 201 P.2d 588 ]; Day v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

West v. Board of Education

43 Cal. App. 199 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 6, 1919

then it is unconstitutional for the reason that the school system is a state system, and not a municipal affair, and is controlled by general laws unless there is an absence of legislation upon the subject; citing Kennedy v. … Also, Mahoney v. Board of Education, 12 Cal.

Richardson v. Board of Supervisors

203 Cal. App. 3d 486 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 1988

Opinion BROWN (G. … (See Skelly v. State Personnel Bd., supra, 15 Cal.3d 194, 219-220 ; James v. Board of Dental Examiners (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 1096, 1116 [ 218 Cal.Rptr. 710 ]; Blake v.

Miller v. Board of Supervisors

122 Cal. App. 3d 539 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 12, 1981

(See Steiger v. Board of Supervisors (1956) 143 Cal.App.2d 352, 358 [ 300 P.2d 210 ].) … (Hamilton v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 269 Cal.App.2d at p. 66 .)

Sweetland v. Franchise Tax Board

192 Cal. App. 2d 316 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 1961

In Gregory v. … (Hazelton Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 36 U.S. Board of Tax Appeals Reports 908.) In this case there was a continuity of interest by the taxpayer in United of Delaware and Hazelton.

Milhous v. Franchise Tax Board

32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 640 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 12, 2005

The Milhouses sought administrative review of the assessment before the State Board of Equalization, which agreed with the FTB. … (S ee Abelleira v.

Cook v. Board of Supervisors

99 Cal. App. 169 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 1929

cities, cities and counties and towns” (approved March 23, 1901 [Stats. 1901, p. 794]), the county clerk of said City and County of San Francisco duly filed with the auditor of said city and county and furnished to the Board … It is admitted that the petitioners have complied with all the provisions of said “Act to provide for the payments of judgments, etc.,” but that said Board of Supervisors has *171 failed, refused and neglected to approve

Apple, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

199 Cal. App. 4th 1 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 2011

(Montana v. … During Apple’s administrative appeal before the state Board of Equalization (SBE), the Second District Court of Appeal issued a decision in Farmers Bros. Co. v.

Opdyk v. California Horse Racing Board

34 Cal. App. 4th 1826 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 1995

See Arneson v. … (Epstein v. California Horse Racing Board, supra, 222 Cal.App.2d 831, 841 .)

Sawyer v. Board of Supervisors

108 Cal. App. 446 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 1930

(See Galvin v. Board of Supervisors, 195 Cal. 686 [ 235 Pac. 450 ].) Again, if the ordinance is void for any reason, the petition for a writ of mandate should be denied. … In the case of Bent Bros. v.