Case law

Alesi v. Board of Retirement

101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 81 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 2000

Alesi relies on Montgomery v. Board of Admin., etc. (1939) 34 Cal.App.2d 514 [ 93 P.2d 1046 ] for the proposition that the city council may not pass any ordinance that conflicts with the provisions of the Charter. … Heaton’s interpretation of the phrase “a result” was followed without further analysis in Gelman v. Board of Retirement (1978) 85 Cal.App.3d 92, 96-97 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 225 ] and noted in passing in Bowen v.

Board of Education v. Talbert

52 Cal. App. 657 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1921

In harmony with this rule is the case of the City of Oakland v. Thompson, 151 Cal. 572 , [ 91 Pac. 387 ]. … In the discussion of the question here involved we have not overlooked the ease of Santa Ana School Dist. v. Talbert, 19 Cal.

Abshear v. Teachers' Retirement Board

231 Cal. App. 3d 1629 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 3, 1991

(Petrucci v. Board of Medical Examiners (1975) 45 Cal.App.3d 83, 87 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 735 ].) … (Anderson v. Latimer (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 667, 670 [ 212 Cal.Rptr. 544 ].) 2.

Duncan v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD

179 Cal. App. 4th 1009 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 2009

DUNCAN, as Administrator, etc., Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and X.S., Respondents. No. H034040. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. November 25, 2009. *1015 Vanessa L. … Accordingly, we annul the decision of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board.

Aughenbaugh v. Board of Supervisors

139 Cal. App. 3d 83 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 12, 1983

(Shouse v. Quinley (1935) 3 Cal.2d 357, 360 [ 45 P.2d 701 ]; Hershey v. Cole (1933) 130 Cal.App. 683, 688 [ 20 P.2d 972 ]; Louisiana ex rel. Hubert v. … As stated in City of Venice v.

Martin v. State Personnel Board

132 Cal. App. 3d 460 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1982

State Personnel Board (1951) *463 37 Cal.2d 634 [ 234 P.2d 981 ]; Lorimore v. State Personnel Board (1965) 232 Cal.App.2d 183 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 640 ]; Skelly v. … (Skelly v. State Personnel Bd., supra, 15 Cal.3d at p. 218 .)

Coelho v. State Personnel Board

209 Cal. App. 3d 968 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1989

{Griffith v. Department of Public Works (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 376, 381 [ 296 P.2d 838 ].) … If the evidence was insufficient to justify disciplinary sanctions against Coelho, the Board had a legal duty to revoke the adverse action. 2 (See, e.g., City of Torrance v.

Steele v. Youthful Offender Parole Board

76 Cal. Rptr. 3d 632 · California Court of Appeal · May 13, 2008

(Foreman & Clark Corp. v. Fallon, supra, at p. 881; Brockey v. Moore (2003) 107 Cal.App,4th 86, 96-97 [ 131 Cal.Rptr.2d 746 ]; Western Aggregates, Inc. v. … (Sauers[ v.

Norris v. State Personnel Board

174 Cal. App. 3d 393 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 15, 1985

Board’s findings must be sustained on appeal if the findings are supported by substantial evidence. (Skelly v. State Personnel Bd. (1975) 15 Cal.3d 194, 217, fn. 31 [ 124 Cal.Rptr. 14 , 539 P.2d 774 ]; Shepherd v. … State Personnel Board (1957) 48 Cal.2d 41, 47 [ 307 P.2d 4 ]; Boren v. State Personnel Board (1951) 37 Cal.2d 634, 637 [ 234 P.2d 981 ].)

Mahoney v. Board of Education

12 Cal. App. 293 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1909

In the ease of Hart v. … In Payne v.

Campbell v. Board of Supervisors

7 Cal. App. 155 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1907

(People v. Taylor, 57 Cal. 620 .) … In Adams v.

Fox v. State Personnel Board

49 Cal. App. 4th 1034 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 27, 1996

(Noguchi v. Civil Service Com. (1986) 187 Cal.App.3d 1521, 1540 [ 232 Cal.Rptr. 394 ]; Franz v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 31 Cal.3d 124, 143 [ 181 Cal.Rptr. 732 , 642 P.2d 792 ].) … Hooks v.

Webb v. State Personnel Board

16 Cal. App. 3d 542 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1971

The board prepared no formal finding and nothing in the record shows an express adoption of the staff’s “findings.” Had the board so desired it could have adopted them or incorporated them by reference. (Swars v. … (Swars v. Council of City of Vallejo, supra; California Motor Transport Co. v. Public Utilities Com., supra, 59 Cal.2d 270.)

Armistead v. State Personnel Board

124 Cal. App. 3d 61 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 2, 1981

(Faulkner v. Cal. Toll Bridge Authority (1953) 40 Cal.2d 317, 329 [ 253 P.2d 659 ].) … (Faulkner v. Cal. Toll Bridge Authority, supra, 40 Cal.2d at p. 329 ; Tringham v.

Mike v. Franchise Tax Board

182 Cal. App. 4th 817 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 2010

Jefferson v. … (Hilderbrand v.

Andreadis v. Board of Trustees

59 Cal. App. 3d 344 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1976

Drive-in Restaurant Assn. v. Clark, 22 Cal.2d 287, 292 [ 140 P. 657 , 147 A.L.R. 1028 ].) … (Los Angeles v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.2d 707, 712 [ 112 P.2d 10 ].)

Ells v. Board of Supervisors

38 Cal. App. 480 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 21, 1918

No. 1 v. Board of Supervisors, 162 Cal. 14, 22 , [ 120 Pac. 780 ].) … Dist. v. De Lappe, 79 Cal. 351 , [ 21 Pac. 825 ].)

Feliciano v. Board of Administration

1 Cal. App. 4th 143 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1991

(Crumpler v. Board of Administration (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 567, 576 [ 108 Cal.Rptr. 293 ]; Toulumne County Deputy Sheriffs’ Assn. v. Board of Administration (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1236, 1238 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 824 ].) … (Charles v. Board of Administration (1991) 232 Cal.App.3d 1410, 1412-1414 [ 284 Cal.Rptr. 106 ].)

Vandegrift v. Board of Supervisors

23 Cal. App. 3d 228 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 1972

(Kaiser v. Hopkins, supra, 6 Cal.2d at p. 540 .) … Gibson (1959) 51 Cal.2d 467 [ 334 P.2d 575 ], and McKesson v.

DiLoreto v. Board of Education

87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 791 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 1999

On September 25, 1996, appellant met with respondents Sussman, school board president Ferraro, and board member Hoffer. … (Brandon v. Board of Ed. of Guilderland Cent. Sch., supra, 635 F.2d at p. 980.)