Case law

Johnson v. Board of Education

179 Cal. App. 3d 593 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1986

Respondent contends that Education Code section 35160 expressly supersedes Pasadena School Dist. v. Pasadena (1913) 166 Cal. 7 [ 134 P. 985 ] and Grigsby v. … The Supreme Court acknowledged this change in Hartzell v.

Holbrook v. Board of Education

113 Cal. App. 2d 840 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1952

(See Kahn v. Smith, 23 Cal.2d 12, 15 [ 142 P.2d 13 ].) … Underwriters’ Report, Inc., 12 Cal.2d 266, 274 [ 83 P.2d 503 ]; Bond v.

Catricala v. State Personnel Board

43 Cal. App. 3d 642 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1974

(See Cadilla v. Board of Medical Examiners (1972) 26 Cal.App.3d 961, 967-968 [ 103 Cal.Rptr. 455 ]; Brown v. … Brown v. Gordon, supra, 240 Cal.App.2d at p. 667 .)

Brennan v. Board of Supervisors

153 Cal. App. 3d 193 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1984

[If] Each digest shall be limited to a maximum of 300 words exclusive of the title for each subsection provided for herein. ’ ” (See Brennan v. Board of Supervisors, 125 Cal.App.3d 87, 90, fn. 1 .) … They are reported as Brennan v. Board of Supervisors (1981) 125 Cal.App.3d 87, 96-97 [ 177 Cal.Rptr. 677 ], to which reference is hereby made.

Jibilian v. Franchise Tax Board

39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 123 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 2006

(Smith v. County of Kern (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1826, 1829 [ 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 716 ] [appellant’s burden is to demonstrate the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer]; Brown v. … (Building Permit Consultants, Inc. v.

Kuhns v. Board of Supervisors

128 Cal. App. 3d 369 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 1982

*373 Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. … Perrine v.

Hofacker v. Board of Supervisors

264 Cal. App. 2d 290 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 1968

(County of Los Angeles v. State of California, 64 Cal.App. 290, 297 [ 222 P. 153 ]; Gridley Camp No. 104 v. Board of Supervisors, 98 Cal.App. 585 [ 277 P. 500 ].) … J., and Brown, (H. C.), J., concurred.

Smith v. Board of Supervisors

216 Cal. App. 3d 862 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1989

Richard Brown, an associate professor at the University of California at Los Angeles School of Public Health. … Under the charter the Board is charged with final approval of the budget. This situation is not unlike that in Friends of Mammoth v.

Brown v. Fifteenth District Agricultural Fair Ass'n

159 Cal. App. 2d 93 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1958

(Guidi v. State, 41 Cal.2d 623 [ 262 P.2d 3 ] ; Pianka v. State, 46 Cal.2d 208 [ 293 P.2d 458 ].) … As was said in Harper v.

Quirk v. Board of Education

199 Cal. App. 3d 729 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1988

(Jones v. … (See Jones, supra, at p. 527 , citing Grant v. Adams (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 127 [ 137 Cal.Rptr. 834 ], and Anaclerio v. Skinner (1976) 64 Cal.App.3d 194 [ 134 Cal.Rptr. 303 ]; also see Hoyme v.

Erven v. Board of Supervisors

53 Cal. App. 3d 1004 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 1975

(See Curtis v. Board of Supervisors, 7 Cal.3d 942, 963 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 297 , 501 P.2d 537 ]; Burrey v. Embarcadero Mun. Improvement Dist., 5 Cal.3d 671, 682-683 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 203 , 488 P.2d 395 ]; Cooper v. … (Curtis v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 1 Cal.3d 942, 963; original italics.)

Gatewood v. Board of Retirement

175 Cal. App. 3d 311 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1985

Bechtel v. Board of Retirement (1980) 102 Cal.App.3d 9, 15 [ 162 Cal.Rptr. 154 ], and Gelman v. Board of Retirement (1978) 85 Cal.App.3d 92, 96-97 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 225 ], relying on Heaton v. … (Accord Allen v. Board of Administration, supra, 34 Cal.3d at p. 120.)

Franchise Tax Board. v. Barnhart

105 Cal. App. 3d 274 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1980

Instead, that board finds its power in statutes that predate the Political Reform Act by almost 30 years. … (Fair Political Practices Com. v.

Meyers v. Board of Supervisors

110 Cal. App. 2d 623 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1952

Proc., § 1074; Borchard v. Board of Supervisors, 144 Cal. 10, 14 [ 77 P. 708 ]; Garvin v. Chambers, 195 Cal. 212, 220 [ 232 P. 696 ]; Cole v. Board of Supervisors, 27 Cal.App. 528, 531 [ 150 P. 784 ].) … Board of Supervisors, 31 Cal.2d 66, 71-78 [ 187 P.2d 686 ]; Cantrell v. Board of Supervisors, 87 Cal.App.2d 471, 475 [ 197 P.2d 218 ].)

Worcester v. Board of Supervisors

55 Cal. App. 2d 883 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1942

tion by the board of supervisors, and that the action of that board has been sustained on appeal by the Social Welfare Board, it having been found by both of these boards that the *887 home in which this minor was residing … It may be first observed that the time at which any possible payment should be commenced is a matter for determination by the respondent boards. (Bila v. Young, 20 Cal.2d 865 [ 129 P.2d 364 ].)

Alexander v. Board of Trustees

139 Cal. App. 3d 567 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1983

(Turner v. Board of Trustees, supra, 16 Cal.3d at p. 824 ; Campbell Elem. Teachers Assn., Inc. v. Abbott, supra, 76 Cal.App.3d at p. 802 .) … (Fuller v.

Wylie v. State Personnel Board

93 Cal. App. 2d 838 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 1949

(Stockton v. Department of Employment, 25 Cal.2d 264 [ 153 P.2d 741 ]; Ahlstedt v. Board of *842 Education, 79 Cal.App.2d 845 [ 180 P.2d 949 ].) This was the so-called common law rule of California. (Ward v. … Marshall, 96 Cal. 155 [ 30 P. 1113 , 31 Am.St.Rep. 198 ]; Pennycook v. Boyle, 26 Cal.App. 301 [ 146 P. 895 ]; O’Neill v. Williams, 53 Cal.App. 1 [ 199 P. 870 ].)

Totten v. Board of Supervisors

43 Cal. Rptr. 3d 244 · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2006

The Citizens court noted that in Rossi v. Brown, supra, 9 Cal.4th at page 703, our Supreme Court had “referred to reasoning it had developed in Geiger v. … In mating this argument, appellant relies principally on McCafferty v. Board of Supervisors (1969) 3 Cal.App.3d 190 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 229 ], and People's Advocate, Inc. v.

Constancio v. State Personnel Board

179 Cal. App. 3d 980 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1986

(Barber, supra, at p. 404 ; Nightingale v. State Personnel Board, supra, 7 Cal.3d at p. 515 .) In Parker v. … In Barber v.

Weber v. Board of Retirement

62 Cal. App. 4th 1440 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1998

(Austin v. Board of Retirement (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1528, 1531 [ 258 Cal.Rptr. 106 ], citation omitted.) … For this proposition, petitioners cite Olson v. Cory, supra, 35 Cal.3d 390 , Goldfarb v. Civil Service Com., supra, 225 Cal.App.3d 633 , and Austin v. Board of Retirement, supra, 209 Cal.App.3d at page 1532 .