Case law

Spurgeon v. Franchise Tax Board

160 Cal. App. 3d 524 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1984

Board of Education, 59 Cal.2d 203, 218 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 700 , 379 P.2d 4 ]; People v. Victor, 62 Cal.2d 280, 300 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 199 , 398 P.2d 391 ].)’ (Fletcher v. Western National Life Ins. … Holmes v. McColgan, supra, 17 Cal.2d at p. 430 ; American Civil Liberties Union v. Board of Education (1963) 59 Cal.2d 203, 218 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 700 , 379 P.2d 4 ].)

Dong v. Board of Trustees

191 Cal. App. 3d 1572 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1987

Rptr. 912 EUGENE DONG, JR., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. H000326. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. … Dong resulted in neither charges of misconduct, nor disciplinary proceedings, nor punishment." ( Board of Trustees v. Superior Court ( Dong ) (1981) 119 Cal. App.3d 516, 527 [ 174 Cal. Rptr. 160 ].)

Swift v. Board of Supervisors

16 Cal. App. 72 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1911

To same effect see Paul v. Carver, 24 Pa. 207 , [ 64 Am. Dec. 649 ]; State v. Deer Lodge Co., 19 Mont. 582 , [ 49 Pac. 147 ] ; Coffey Co. v. Venard, 10 Kan. 80 . … As said in Bradbury v. Walton, 94 Ky. 167 , [ 21 S.

Board of Administration v. Kuppens

49 Cal. App. 3d 758 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1975

(Brown v. Superior Court, 3 Cal.3d 427, 431-432 [ 90 Cal.Rptr. 737 , 476 P.2d 105 ]; see also Smith v. Trapp, 249 Cal.App.2d 929, 940 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 229 ].) … Board of Administration v. Ames, supra, 215 Cal.App.2d 215 , does not support defendants’ position.

Stop the Casino 101 Coalition v. Brown

230 Cal. App. 4th 280 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 2014

BROWN, JR., as Governor, (Sonoma County etc., Super. Ct. No. SCV-251712) Defendant and Respondent. … .”]; Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Podhradsky (8th Cir.

Cochran v. Board of Supervisors

85 Cal. App. 3d 75 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 1978

On April 1 and 2, 1976, the Del Norte County Board of Supervisors (hereafter Board), sitting as a board of equalization, held hearings on the applications of Harold A., Jane S. and Prudence M. … The Board’s conclusions of law, however, are subject to independent reassessment. (Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. County of Butte (1974) 37 Cal.App.3d 461, 473-474 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 327 ].)

Newman v. State Personnel Board

10 Cal. App. 4th 41 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 1992

In assessing whether substantial evidence exists, we consider all evidence presented, including that which fairly detracts from the evidence supporting the Board’s determination. (County of San Diego v. … In the proceedings before the Board, CHP had the burden of proving plaintiff’s inability to perform the work of her position or any other available position. (Overton v.

Barnes v. Board of Trustees

218 Cal. App. 2d 881 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 5, 1963

(Cleeves v. Board of Education, 22 Cal.App.2d 183 [ 70 P.2d 645 ]; Fidler v. Board of Trustees, 112 Cal.App. 296 [ 296 P. 912 ]; Abraham v. … Board of Education, 17 Cal.2d 753 [ 112 P.2d 229 ]), nor can it reduce salaries in an arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable manner. (Kacsur v.

Kalinowski v. Board of Education

90 Cal. App. 3d 245 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 1979

to receive her “regular salary and all other benefits of employment during the period dating from his [her] suspension to the filing of the report of the panel with the governing board.” … V Although not carried into the formal judgment, the conclusions of law provide as follows: “8.

Hoyme v. Board of Education

107 Cal. App. 3d 449 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1980

(Barton v. Governing Board, supra, 60 Cal. App.3d at p. 479 .) … (Grant v. Adams, supra, 69 Cal.App.3d at p. 134 ; Barton v. Governing Board, supra, 60 Cal.App.3d at p. 479 .)

Gallup v. Board of Trustees

41 Cal. App. 4th 1571 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1996

Governing Board (1981) 116 Cal.App.3d 831 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 312 ], and San Jose Teachers Assn. v. … (Santa Clara Federation of Teachers v. Governing Board, supra, 116 Cal.App.3d 831, 844 .)

Tilton v. Board of Education

25 Cal. App. 2d 746 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1938

On the authority of Gentner v. Board of Education, 219 Cal. 135 [25 Pac, (2d) 824], these questions must be deter *749 mined adversely to the claims of plaintiff herein. … That portion of the judgment directing the defendant board of education to pay to plaintiff $1800 and decreeing that said board order a warrant drawn in her favor for that amount is reversed.

Bernhardt v. Board of Supervisors

58 Cal. App. 3d 806 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1976

This result is required by Mooney v. … (Mooney v. Pickett, supra, 4 Cal.3d 669 at pp. 679-681.)

Rutherford v. Board of Trustees

64 Cal. App. 3d 167 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 1976

(Rutherford v. Board of Trustees (1974).) … (Arques v.

Crowley v. Board of Supervisors

88 Cal. App. 2d 988 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1948

(Allen v. Bowron, 64 Cal.App.2d 311, 313 [ 148 P.2d 673 ]; 16 Cal.Jur., Mandamus, § 28, p. 809; ef., Kentfield v. Reclamation Board, 137 Cal.App. 675 [ 31 P.2d 431 ].) … Co. v.

Richter v. Board of Supervisors

259 Cal. App. 2d 99 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1968

As stated by our Supreme Court in Johnston v. … And it is with regard to such a decision that the board of supervisors does not act in a legislative capacity (See Johnston v. Board of Supervisors, 31 Cal.2d 66 [ 187 P.2d 686 ] ; and Essick v.

Poliak v. Board of Psychology

55 Cal. App. 4th 342 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1997

(Viking Pools, Inc. v. Maloney (1989) 48 Cal.3d 602, 606 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 320 , 770 P.2d 732 ].) … (People v. Woodhead (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1002, 1007-1008 [ 239 Cal.Rptr. 656 , 741 P.2d 154 ].) Moreover, where possible, significance should be given to every word and phrase. (Seidler v.

Fowler v. State Personnel Board

134 Cal. App. 3d 964 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1982

Martin Nebraska Co. v. Culkin (8th Cir. 1952) 197 F.2d 981 ; Lindell v. General Electric Co. (1954) 44 Wn.2d 386 [ 267 P.2d 709 ]). … (L os Angeles Fire & Police Protective League v.

Brown v. L.A. Unified School Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 2021

Bejarano and David V. … (Wallace v.

Brennan v. Board of Supervisors

153 Cal. App. 3d 193 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1984

[If] Each digest shall be limited to a maximum of 300 words exclusive of the title for each subsection provided for herein. ’ ” (See Brennan v. Board of Supervisors, 125 Cal.App.3d 87, 90, fn. 1 .) … They are reported as Brennan v. Board of Supervisors (1981) 125 Cal.App.3d 87, 96-97 [ 177 Cal.Rptr. 677 ], to which reference is hereby made.