Case law

In Re Marriage of Brown

27 Cal. App. 3d 188 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1972

Bernice Brown appeals an interlocutory judgment of dissolution of her marriage to Leroy Brown. … (Bensing v. Bensing, 25 Cal.App.3d 889, 893 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 255 ].)

Bradley v. Board of Education

1 Cal. App. 212 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1905

This is an appeal from a judgment against appellant on a demurrer to her petition for a writ of mandate, to be directed to the board of education of the city and *213 county of San Francisco, requiring said board to restore … The power to employ teachers is given to city boards of education by section 1617 of the Political Code, whieh, as was said in Kennedy v.

Gaenslen v. Board of Directors

185 Cal. App. 3d 563 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1985

(Applebaum v. Board of Directors (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 648, 657 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 831 ].) … (Cipriotti v. Board of Directors (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 144, 155 [ 196 Cal.Rptr. 367 ].) The function of the trial and appellate courts is the *573 same with respect to such review. 5 (Pick v.

Caveness v. State Personnel Board

113 Cal. App. 3d 617 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1980

Additionally, Coomes v. State Personnel Board (1963) 215 Cal.App.2d 770, 775 [ 30 Cal.Rptr. 639 ] requires that insubordination be founded upon proof of intentional or wilful conduct. … (Skelly v. State Personnel Bd., supra, 15 Cal.3d 194, 218 ; see also Blake v. State Personnel Board (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 541, 550-551, 554 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 50 ].)

Gonzales v. State Personnel Board

76 Cal. App. 3d 364 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1977

That finding of good cause is not attacked on this appeal. *367 II Petitioner relies on a decision of this division of this district in Faulkner v. … If petitioner succeeds on his appeal, he will become entitled to full back pay; if he loses on the appeal, he will be entitled only to partial back pay. under Barber v.

Spurgeon v. Franchise Tax Board

160 Cal. App. 3d 524 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1984

Board of Education, 59 Cal.2d 203, 218 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 700 , 379 P.2d 4 ]; People v. Victor, 62 Cal.2d 280, 300 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 199 , 398 P.2d 391 ].)’ (Fletcher v. Western National Life Ins. … Holmes v. McColgan, supra, 17 Cal.2d at p. 430 ; American Civil Liberties Union v. Board of Education (1963) 59 Cal.2d 203, 218 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 700 , 379 P.2d 4 ].)

Alberts v. Board of Supervisors

193 Cal. App. 2d 225 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 1961

Appellants rely entirely on McCluskey v. Sparks (1955), 80 Ariz. 15 [ 291 P.2d 791 ] ; Sparks v. … Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 216 Cal. 474 [ 14 P.2d 512 ] ; Mahoney v. City of San Diego, 198 Cal. 388 [ 245 P. 189 ] ; Birch v. County of Orange, 186 Cal. 736 [ 200 P. 647 ]; and City of Los Angeles v.

Mann v. Workmen's Compensation Board

265 Cal. App. 2d 333 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 1968

(Jones v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 68 Cal.2d 476, 479 [ 67 Cal.Rptr. 544 , 439 P.2d 648 ].) … (Hines v. Industrial Acc. Com., 215 Cal. 177, 188 [ 8 P.2d 1021 ].)

Duffy v. State Personnel Board

232 Cal. App. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 1991

The board again rejected the ALJ’s decision. … (Brown v. Merlo (1973) 8 Cal.3d 855, 861 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 , 66 A.L.R.3d 505 ]; 8 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (9th ed. 1988) Constitutional Law, §§ 599, 603, pp. 51, 57.)

Lee v. Board of Administration

130 Cal. App. 3d 122 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 1982

(Shaw v. Board of Administration (1952) 109 Cal.App.2d 770, 774 [ 241 P.2d 635 ], overruled on other grounds in Watenpaugh v. State Teachers’ Retirement (1959) 51 Cal.2d 675, 681-682 [ 336 P.2d 165 ].) … Rptr. 27 ]), whether it purports to advise and direct or merely to inform and respond to inquiries (see Tyra v. Board of Police etc. Commrs. (1948) 32 Cal.2d 666, 670 [ 197 P.2d 710 ]), and whether it acts in bad faith.

Pan v. State Personnel Board

180 Cal. App. 3d 351 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 1986

(Warren v. State Personnel Bd., supra.) Upon viewing the record in such a light we find sufficient evidence to support the board’s findings. Reach testified that he called plaintiff at approximately 9:25 p.m. … The board was warranted in concluding this constituted a neglect of duty. (Compare Fein v. Permanente Medical Group (1985) 38 Cal.3d 137, 144-145 [ 211 Cal.Rptr. 368 , 695 P.2d 665 ].)

Brown v. Solano County Business Development, Inc.

92 Cal. App. 3d 192 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 1979

Plaintiff Jessie Brown (appellant or Brown) appeals from a summaiy judgment rendered in favor of respondents Solano County Business Development, Inc. (SCBD), Lestee Ceasar and Loreta Ceasar (the Ceasars). … Two or three weeks later, on June 30, 1975, Brown’s contractor’s license expired.

Newbold v. Social Welfare Board

76 Cal. App. 2d 844 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 1946

That action was affirmed by the State Social Welfare Board, that board finding that the petitioner possessed personal property amounting to $2,320; that since she owned more than $600 in cash and securities and had no plan … In making such investigations and decisions the boards of supervisors are bound, and in malting rules and regulations the state board is bound, by other sections of this chapter, including 3005 and 3084.

Fout v. State Personnel Board

136 Cal. App. 3d 817 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 21, 1982

(Barber v. State Personnel Bd. (1976) 18 Cal.3d 395, 404 [ 134 Cal.Rptr. 206 , 556 P.2d 306 ]; Blake v. State Personnel Board (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 541, 553 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 50 ].) … (St anton v.

Sleeper v. Board of Supervisors

60 Cal. App. 744 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1923

The evidence produced at the hearing before the board is as silent as the petition on the foregoing questions. … said board, be benefited by such district be included within such proposed district.”

Mayer v. Board of Trustees

106 Cal. App. 3d 476 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1980

(Kacsur v. Board of Trustees, supra, 18 Cal.2d 586, 592 .) … (Kacsur v. Board of Trustees, supra, 18 Cal.2d 586, 594 .)

Tailfeather v. Board of Supervisors

48 Cal. App. 4th 1223 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1996

(See Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior Court (1976) 16 Cal.3d 392, 413 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 183 , 546 P.2d 687 ].) … In Mooney v.

Board of Retirement v. Terry

40 Cal. App. 3d 1091 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 5, 1974

In Board of Administration v. Ames, 215 Cal.App.2d 215 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 917 ], the reviewing court was faced with the identical questions before us. … (Board of Administration v. Ames, supra, 215 Cal.App.2d 215, 228-229 ; cf. Bilyeu v. State Employees’ Retirement System, 58 Cal.2d 618, 623-625 [ 24 Cal.Rptr. 562 , 375 P.2d 442 ].)

Dong v. Board of Trustees

191 Cal. App. 3d 1572 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1987

Rptr. 912 EUGENE DONG, JR., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. H000326. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. … Dong resulted in neither charges of misconduct, nor disciplinary proceedings, nor punishment." ( Board of Trustees v. Superior Court ( Dong ) (1981) 119 Cal. App.3d 516, 527 [ 174 Cal. Rptr. 160 ].)

Crow v. Board of Supervisors

135 Cal. App. 451 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 1933

The proceeding in certiorari was upheld in the case of Maxwell v. Board of Supervisors of Stanislaus County, 53 Cal. 389 . … (See, also, Whitmore v. Brown, 207 Cal. 473 [ 279 Pac. 447 ].)