Case law

Zike v. State Personnel Board

145 Cal. App. 3d 817 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 1983

Curia v. … (Martin v. State Personnel Board (1982) 132 Cal.App.3d 460 [ 183 Cal.Rptr. 295 ].) But pursuant to the dictates of Skelly v.

Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co.

California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 2018

(Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co. (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 489, 497.) … (Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Brown (2012) 566 U.S. 937.)

Ogden v. Board of Trustees

74 Cal. App. 161 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1925

Evans as members of the Board of Trustees of said city, which city is a municipal corporation of the sixth class. … In Wright v.

Board of Trustees v. Leach

258 Cal. App. 2d 281 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 1968

(Hall v. City of Taft, supra, 47 Cal.2d at p. 181.) “The school district is a state agency and its board members are state officers.” (People v. Darby, 114 Cal.App.2d 412, 423 [ 250 P.2d 743 ].) … Thus, in Lansing v. Board of Education, 7 Cal.App.2d 211, 213 [ 45 P.2d 1021 ], the court said: “. . .

Dong v. Board of Trustees

191 Cal. App. 3d 1572 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1987

Rptr. 912 EUGENE DONG, JR., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. H000326. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. … Dong resulted in neither charges of misconduct, nor disciplinary proceedings, nor punishment." ( Board of Trustees v. Superior Court ( Dong ) (1981) 119 Cal. App.3d 516, 527 [ 174 Cal. Rptr. 160 ].)

Lara v. Board of Supervisors

59 Cal. App. 3d 399 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1976

Appellants’ petition and complaint failed to state a cause of action against the respondent board of supervisors. The judgment is affirmed. Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Keane, J., * concurred. … (Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. Cal. Emp.

Valentino v. Franchise Tax Board

105 Cal. Rptr. 2d 304 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 2001

(Miller v. … (Christman v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 64 Cal.App.3d at p. 759 .)

Walsh v. Board of Trustees

2 Cal. App. 2d 180 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 1934

In Cullen v. Board of Education, 126 Cal. … As the court said in Cullen v.

Struckman v. Board of Trustees

38 Cal. App. 2d 373 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1940

Struckman, (own writing), do hereby certify that I have read the policy as adopted by the Board of Trustees of Tracy Union High School on May 11, 1937, at a regular Board meeting. … Board of Trustees from any and all obligations whatsoever to re-employ me, should my character, health, or ability change and become any other than that standard which is maintained by the Board of Trustees for teachers

Whitfield v. Board of Supervisors

227 Cal. App. 3d 451 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1991

Since the facts are undisputed and the assessment of whether the Board satisfied its statutory duties presents questions of law (Poverty Resistance Center v. … (Elmore v.

Board of Education v. King

82 Cal. App. 2d 857 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 1947

(Marceau v. Travelers’ Ins. Co., 101 Cal. 338, 344 [ 35 P. 856 , 36 P. 813 ] ; Burke v. Wells, Fargo & Co., 34 Cal. 60, 62 ; Burbank v. McIntyre, 135 Cal.App. 482, 485 [ 27 P.2d 400 ]. See, also, Tapley v. … When any employee who has been served with notice of the governing board’s intention to dismiss him demands a hearing, the governing board shall have the option either (a) to rescind its action, or (b) to file a complaint

Curtis v. Board of Retirement

177 Cal. App. 3d 293 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1986

The court in Mansperger v. … (Gorman v. Cranston (1966) 64 Cal.2d 441 [ 50 Cal.Rptr. 533 , 413 P.2d 133 ]; Neeley v. Board of Retirement (1974) 36 Cal.App.3d 815 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 841 ].)

Bradford v. Board of Education

18 Cal. App. 19 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 10, 1912

(Wayland v. Board of School Directors, 43 Wash. 441 , [7 L. R. A., N. S., 352, 86 Pac. 642 ] ; Wilson v. Board of Education, 233 Ill. 464 , [13 Ann. Cas. 330, 15 L. R. A., N. S., 1136, 84 N. E. 697 ] ;. Favorite v. … As was said in the ease of Wilson v. Board of Education, 137 Ill.

Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc.

206 Cal. App. 4th 515 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 2012

(See People v. … (Acree v.

Board of Supervisors v. Rechenmacher

105 Cal. App. 2d 39 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 1951

(City of Redding v. Holland, 75 Cal.App.2d 178, 185 [ 170 P.2d 132 ] ; City of San Diego v. Milan, 127 Cal.App. 521, 527-528 [ 16 P.2d 357 ]. See other cases cited in City of Redding v. Hol *44 land, supra.) … (See County of Sacramento v. Stephens, 11 Cal.App.2d 110 [ 53 P.2d 197 ].)

Jillson v. Board of Supervisors

221 Cal. App. 2d 192 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 14, 1963

See Security-First National Bank v. Board of Supervisors, 35 Cal.2d 323 [ 217 P.2d 948 ]; Vista Irrigation Dist. v. Board of Supervisors, 32 Cal.2d 477 [ 196 P.2d 926 ]; Sherman v. Quinn, 31 Cal.2d 661 [ 192 P.2d 17 ].” … The petitioner relies strongly on Laisne v. State Board of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 [ 123 P.2d 457 ].

Peter v. Board of Supervisors

78 Cal. App. 2d 515 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 11, 1947

It is elemental that in proceedings of this kind the order under attack can only be vacated if the board of supervisors exceeded its jurisdiction in making it. (Garvin v. Chambers, 195 Cal. 212 [ 232 P. 696 ]; Nider v. … Fink, 121 Cal.App. 14 [ 8 P.2d 493 ]; Heard v. Board of Administration, 39 Cal.App.2d 685 [ 104 P.2d 47 ].)

Board of Trustees v. Hartman

246 Cal. App. 2d 756 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 1966

(See Horosko v. School Dist. of Mount Pleasant Tp., 335 Pa. 369, 371 [ 6 A.2d 866, 868 ].) This idea was expressed by Justice Spence in Board of Education v. … As said in Goldsmith v. Board of Education, 66 Cal.App. 157, 168 [ 225 P. 783 ] : ‘. . .

State Board of Equalization v. Board of Supervisors of San Diego County

105 Cal. App. 3d 813 · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 1980

Dist. v. … In either case, the action of the San Diego Board of Supervisors was proper and we affirm the denial of the writ of mandate. Judgment affirmed. Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Cologne, J., concurred.

In Re Marriage of Brown

27 Cal. App. 3d 188 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1972

Bernice Brown appeals an interlocutory judgment of dissolution of her marriage to Leroy Brown. … (Bensing v. Bensing, 25 Cal.App.3d 889, 893 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 255 ].)