Case law

Opinion No. (2008)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 2008

BROWN JR. Attorney General DANIEL G. … VII , § 4 (k). 22 See Frey v.

Opinion No. (2002)

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 30, 2002

"(F) Shed boards designed to prevent aggregate materials from being deposited on the vehicle body during top loading. … (Day v. City of Fontana (2001) 25 Cal.4th 268 , 272 .) "The words of the statute are the starting point." (Wilcox v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 2022

Adams (1964) 229 Cal.App.2d, 602, 606; van’t Rood v. County of Santa Clara (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 549; Bright v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 66 Cal.App.3d 191, 194 (Bright); see also South Central Coast Regional Com. v. … In Bright v.

Opinion No. (2002)

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 2, 2002

The California Veterinary Medical Board has administratively implemented this statutory provision regarding the "proper training in the administration of sodium phenobarbital" by adopting section 16:2039 of title 16 of the … While the Legislature has outlawed various methods of killing animals (see, e.g., §§ 597u , 597v , 597w , 597y ) and not specifically the administration of intracardiac injections on conscious animals, the court in People v.

Opinion No. (2000)

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 24, 2000

In Newland v. Board of Governors (1977) 19 Cal.3d 705 , the Supreme Court addressed a similar question. … (Woods v. Young (1991) 53 Cal.3d 315 , 323 .) "[I]t is presumed the Legislature intended reasonable results consistent with its expressed purpose, not absurd consequences. [Citations.]" (Harris v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 22, 1999

II, § 11; § 9247; Browne v. … (Buckley v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 3, 1988

(Ralphs Grocery Co. v. … And in Thirteen Committee v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 14, 1992

(City of Los Angeles v. City of San Fernando, supra, 14 Cal.3d 199, 277; Bing v. City of Duarte (1967) 65 Cal.2d 627, 631-632; Flournoy v. State of California (1962) 57 Cal. 2d 497, 498-499; Hoyt v. … Board of Civil Service Commrs. (1956) 21 Cal. 2d 399, 402; State of California v. Marin Mun. Water District (1941) 17 Cal. 2d 699, 704-705; Fair Political Practices Com. v.

Opinion No. (2006)

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 1, 2006

[Citations.]'" ( Granberry v. Islay Investments (1995) 9 Cal.4th 738 , 744 , quoting People v. Woodhead (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1002 , 1007-1008 .) … "For the purpose of all local ordinances, a residential facility which serves six or fewer persons shall not be included within the definition of a boarding house, rooming house, institution or home for the care of minors

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 14, 1999

(Bishop v. City of San Jose (1969) 1 Cal.3d 56, 61; Butterworth v. … (See Wilson v.

Opinion No. (2001)

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 16, 2001

(San Marcos Water Dist. v. San Marcos Unified School Dist. (1986) 42 Cal.3d 154 , 161 ; Inglewood v. County of Los Angeles (1929) 207 Cal. 697 , 703-704 .) … Improvement Dist. v. Board of Supervisors (1980) 112 Cal.App.3d 545 , 552-553 .) As explained in San Marcos Water Dist. v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 8, 1990

(Cf., Safer v. Superior Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 230, 236, 238; Santa Fe Transp. v. State Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 531, 538-539; Board of Trustees v. Judge (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 920, 927.) … Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board, supra, 10 Cal.3d 222, 230; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equalization, supra, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645.)

Opinion No. (2002)

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 2002

(Stigall v. City of Taft (1962) 58 Cal.2d 565 , 569 ; see Thorpe v. Long Beach Community College Dist. (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 655 , 659 ; Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del Norte (1977) 68 Cal.App.3d 201 , 215 .) … (Thomson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633 , 645 ; see Moody v. Shuffleton (1928) 203 Cal. 100 , 102-105 ; Terry v. Bender (1956) 143 Cal.App.2d 198 , 207-208 ; People v. Darby (1952) 114 Cal.App.2d 412 , 431-432 .)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 25, 1990

(Lara v. Board of Supervisors (1976) 59 Cal.App.3d 399, 408-409.) … Advisory Agency (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 749, 755; Bright v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 66 Cal.App.3d 191, 195; Hersch v. Mountain View (1976) 64 Cal.App.3d 425, 432-433; Pratt v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 2017

(Id.; see McGregor v. Board of Trustees of the Town of Burlingame (1911) 159 Cal. 441, 446-447; Klose v. Superior Court in and for San Mateo County (1950) 96 Cal.App.2d 913, 921-922.) … City of Lawndale, supra, 91 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1228-1229. 5 95 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 50, 51 (2012). 6 See City of Orange v.

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1998

The words are to be given "their usual and ordinary meaning." ( DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc . (1992) 2 Cal.4th 593 , 601 .) … [Citation.]" ( O'Brien v. Dudenhoeffer (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 327 , 334 ; see People v. Cruz (1996) 13 Cal.4th 764 , 773-774 , fn. 5.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 2017

(Id.; see McGregor v. Board of Trustees of the Town of Burlingame (1911) 159 Cal. 441, 446-447; Klose v. Superior Court in and for San Mateo County (1950) 96 Cal.App.2d 913, 921-922.) … City of Lawndale, supra, 91 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1228-1229. 5 95 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 50, 51 (2012). 6 See City of Orange v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 1997

(Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System (1993) 6 Cal.4th 821, 826.) … (DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 593, 601.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 3, 1987

We think the answer is found in the case of People v. Mueller (1970) 8 Cal.App.3d 949. … However, a court would not be bound by a declaration of the board of supervisors as to the purpose of the ordinance when evidence indicates some other purpose was the principal motivation for its enactment. (Coulter v.

Opinion No. (2010)

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 2010

BROWN JR. Attorney General SUSAN DUNCAN LEE Supervising Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE ALBERTO TORRICO, MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following questions: 1. … Code §§ 34600 - 34672 .) 14 Horwich v. Super. Ct. , 21 Cal. 4th 272 , 290 (1999) (citing People v.