Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
955 results
2.83s
Untitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1994
State law requires the board of supervisors in each county to "provide suitable rooms for holding the superior, municipal, and justice courts . . . ." (§ 68073.) As explained in Simpson v. … As stated in Wilson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Opinion 23-902
107 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 62 · California Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 2024
justification for the legislative proposal here. 37 Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., supra, 600 U.S. at p. 226. 38 See ante, fns. 16-17. 39 Brown v. … (emphasizing “the importance of education in maintaining our basic institutions, and the lasting impact of its deprivation on the life of the child”). 41 Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jul 16, 1998
In Miller v. … (Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1616, 1623; see also, City of Fairfield v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Nov 18, 1998
(Brown v. West Covina Toyota (1994) 26 Cal.App.4th 555, 565-566.) "[W]e interpret a statute in context, examining other legislation on the same subject, to determine the Legislature's probable intent. … The governing statute is section 6546, which provides: "In addition to other powers, any agency, commission, or board provided for by a joint powers agreement pursuant to Article
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 1998
(See San Marcos Water Dist. v. San Marcos Unified School Dist., supra, 42 Cal.3d at 161-162; Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing Board (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 218, 234; J.W. Jones Companies v. … As stated in San Marcos Water Dist. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1997
"(d) Any hearing conducted under this section shall be held before a three-member board. … (See California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. v. State Personnel Bd. (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1133, 1147 ["a practical construction is preferred"]; Harris v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1989
A board coordinating parole agent employed by the Youthful Offender Parole Board shall not carry firearms." … Corey (1978) 21 Cal.3d 738, 746; People v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 1997
ANALYSIS The Mendocino Fire Protection District ("District") was established in 1948 and is governed by a board of three elected, unpaid commissioners. … No one would be required to enforce the State Fire Marshal's standards, although the State Fire Marshal would have the authority to do so if requested by a district's governing board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · May 23, 1997
Board of Administration (1978) 21 Cal.3d 859, 863; 77 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 50, 53 (1994); 73 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra, 302; 67 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra, 512.) In Olson v. … (Olson v. Cory, supra, 27 Cal.3d at 540; Betts v. Board of Administration, supra, 21 Cal.3d at 866; 70 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra, 218.) 7 of 7
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Dec 15, 1993
(See Lee v. Weisman (1992) 505 U.S. __ [120 L.Ed.2d 467, 480-481; 112 S.Ct. 2649].) In Marsh v. … "Even under the [California Educational Facilities Authority v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jun 16, 1997
(Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System (1993) 6 Cal.4th 821, 826. … (San Diego Union v. City Council (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 947, 954.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 1986
Carleson (1971) 5 Cal.3d 730, 746; County of Alameda v. Janssen, supra, 16 Cal.2d 276, 281; The Housing Authority v. Dockweiler, supra, 14 Cal.2d at pp. 449-450; Veterans' Welfare Board v. … Cal. v. County of Los Angeles (1975) 44 Cal.App.3d 990, 997; Board of Supervisors v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · May 10, 1988
(Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 256; Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El Segundo (1977) 19 Cal.3d 152, 163; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645.) … Dealers v. National Etc. Co. (1938) 11 Cal.2d 634, 659; and compare Furnish v. Board of Medical Examiners (1957) 149 Cal.App.2d 326, 329-330, with Board of Trustees v. Judge (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 920, 927-928 & fn. 2.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 2001
(American Canyon Fire Protection Dist. v. County of Napa (1983) 141 Cal.App.3d 100 , 104 ; McClain v. … director — school district board member]; 67 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 409 (1984) [water district general manager — county supervisor].)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1998
Fair Employment & Housing Com. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1379, 1387), while arriving at an interpretation that effectuates the intent of the Legislature (Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 721,724). … (Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System (1993) 6 Cal.4th 821, 826.) We give the words "their usual and ordinary meaning. [Citations.]" (Dafonte v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 1999
No regulation has been adopted by the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board or by the federal Environmental Protection Agency. (§ 6404.5, subd. (f)(1)(B).) … In ascertaining legislative intent, we turn first to the language used (Tracy v. Municipal Court (1978) 22 Cal.3d 760, 764), giving the words their ordinary and usual meanings (People v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Dec 31, 2009
BROWN JR. Attorney General DIANE E. … In Kroupa v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 1988
(Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 8 Cal.3d at 256; Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El Segundo (1977) 19 Cal.3d 152, 163; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645.) … (West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance Loans (1970) 2 Cal.3d 594, 608; Rich v. State Board of Optometry (1965) 235 Cal.App.2d 591, 604.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1996
(Walters v. Weed (1988) 45 Cal.3d 1, 7; Smith v. Smith (1955) 45 Cal.2d 235, 239; see also Fenton v. Board of Directors (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 1107, 1113; 72 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 8, 11 (1989).) … (Fenton v. Board of Directors, supra, 156 Cal.App.3d at 116.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 2006
Code, § 3 ; Evangelatos v. Superior Court (1998) 44 Cal.3d 1188 , 1207-1209 ; Alch v. … (See McClung v. Employment Development Dept. (2004) 34 Cal.4th 467 , 477 ; Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc. (2002) 28 Cal.4th 828 , 846-847 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna