Case law

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1986

Support for this conclusion may also be found in Cupertino Sanitary Dist. v. Board of Supervisors (1962) 208 Cal.App.2d 52. … And in such a situation, we held in County of Contra Costa v. East Bay Municipal Util.

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 18, 1998

Union, Local No. 22 v. … California State Bd. of Accountancy (1992) 2 Cal.4th 999 , 1011-1012 ; see Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV (1991) 52 Cal.3d 1142 , 1159-1160 ; Dyna-Med, Inc . v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 1993

Board of Supervisors (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 940, 949; Cox Cable San Diego, Inc. v. … Under this facet of the rule, an officer or board may perform necessary public duties without violating section 1090 if no one else may legally act. (See Caminetti v. Pac.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1995

Santa Cruz City School Board of Education (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 1, 6-7; City of Santa Clara v. Santa Clara Unified School District (1971) 22 Cal.App.3d 152, 156-158.) … (Pearson v. State Social Welfare Board (1960) 54 Cal.2d 184, 214; 62 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 798, 803 (1979).)

Opinion No. (2002)

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 12, 2002

(Cumero v. Public Employment Relations Board (1989) 49 Cal.3d 575 , 591 ; 84 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 5 , 8-9 (2001) [school districts]; 81 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 218 , 220-221 (1998) [community college districts].) … (See Johnson v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 18, 1994

(See People v. Brown (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1489, 1496-1499; People v. Owen (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 996, 1003-1007; People v. Gleghorn (1987) 193 Cal.App.3d 196, 200-204.) … (Brown v. Johnson (1979) 98 Cal.App.3d 844, 849-850.) Nevertheless, it remains to be determined whether the documentary recitation in question must be recorded at all.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 16, 1998

"Our conclusion does not mean that members of advisory boards and commissions of local agencies may never be hired as consultants upon leaving public service. … of which he or she is a member, on the same terms and conditions as if he or she were not a member of the board

Opinion No. (2007)

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2007

BROWN JR. Attorney General TAYLOR S. … (v) A surface protection product.

Opinion No. (2007)

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 2007

BROWN JR. … Code, § 21100.4 ; In re Moffett (4th Cir. 2004) 356 F.3d 518 ; Lindberg v. Williston Indus. Supply Corp. (N.D. 1987) 411 N.W.2d 368 ; Adams v. Egley (S.D. Cal. 1972) 338 F.Supp. 614 ; American Insurance Company v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 9, 1988

"The board has exclusive control of the administration of the funds. … (See Sgaglione v. Levitt, supra, 337 N.E.2d 592; State Teachers' Retirement Board v. Giessel, supra, 106 N.W.2d 301; cf. Whitmire v. City of Eureka (1972) 29 Cal.App.3d 28, 34.)"

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1992

XXVIII; Sierra Club v. City of Hayward (1981) 28 Cal.3d 840, 851; Honey Springs Homeowners Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1984) 157 Cal.App.3d 1122, 1131; Shellenberger v. … Board of Equalization (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 510, 513; Kelsey v. Colwell (1973) 30 Cal.App.3d 590, 592.)

Opinion No. (2005)

California Attorney General Reports · May 13, 2005

(Fair Political Practices Com. v. Superior Court (1979) 25 Cal.3d 33 , citing Zablocki v. Redhail (1978) 434 U.S. 374 , 386387 and Gould v. Grubb (1975) 14 Cal.3d 661 , 670 ; see Board of Supervisors v. … (See Planning Conservation League, Inc. v. Lungren, supra, 38 Cal.App.4th at p. 507 .) As observed by the court in Board of Supervisors v. Local Agency Formation Com., supra, 3 Cal.4th at 903 : . . .

California Attorney General Opinion 23-401

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 9, 2024

State Board of Control (1985) 176 Cal.App.3d 1059, 1063 (subpoena implicates judicial process of court to compel). 9 Branzburg v. Hayes (1972) 408 U.S. 665, 682 fn. 6. 10 Pen. Code, § 1326, subd. … (See Board of Retirement v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 1999

(Thomson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633, 649-650; Stigall v. … (Thomson v. Call, supra, 38 Cal.3d at 646.) Significantly, the prohibition of section 1090 is not restricted to the specific officer or board that “makes” the contract.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 1999

(a); State Bd. of Equalization v. Board of Supervisors (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 813, 822- 823.)” … (See McClelland v. Board of Supervisors (1947) 20 Cal.2d 124, 129.) Finally, we note the following principles of statutory construction set forth in People v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 6, 1994

As stated in Sangster v. … In Victoria Groves Five v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 1992

As recently stated in Delaney v. Superior Court, (1990) 50 Cal.3d 785, 798: "We begin with the fundamental rule that our primary task is to determine the lawmakers' intent. (Brown v. … (Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co., supra, 48 Cal.3d 711, 724, quoting Moyer v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd. (1973) 10 Cal.3d 222, 230.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 18, 1987

(Sand v. Superior Court, supra, 34 Cal.3d 567, 570; Rich v. State Board of Optometry, supra, 235 Cal.App.2d 591, 607; 65 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 32, 35, supra.) … (Rich v. State Board of Optometry, supra, 235 Cal.app.3d 591, 604.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 7, 1991

In California State Employees' Assn. v. … (California State Employees' Assn. v. State of California, supra, 199 Cal.3d 840, 851; see Burum v. State Compensation Ins. Fund (1947) 30 Cal.2d 575, 582; State Compensation Ins. Fund v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 18, 1998

." (§ 25210.3; see Frommhagen v. Board of Supervisors (1987) 197 Cal.App.3d 1292, 1296.) … (See Frommhagen v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 197 Cal.App.3d at 1296; 62 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra, at 838-839.)