Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalag

955 results

1.16s

  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Sep 30, 1994

    (Moore v. California State Board of Accountancy (1992) 2 Cal.4th 999, 1012.) "`To discern legislative intent, we must examine the legislative history and statutory context of the act under scrutiny.'" … (People v. Woods (1970) 7 Cal.App.3d 382, 387; People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jun 12, 1998

    (Craig v. Superior Court (1910) 157 Cal. 481; Curphey v. Superior Court (1959) 169 Cal.App.2d 261, 266.) … (Baines v. Zemansky (1917) 176 Cal. 369, 377; Scheafer v. Herman (1916) 172 Cal. 338; Dinan v. Superior Court (1907) 6 Cal.App. 217.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1991

    (Burns v. Richardson, supra, 384 U.S. at 92; see Gaffney v. Cummings, supra, 412 U.S. at 746, fn. 12; Calderon v. … (See Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, supra, 394 U.S. at 534-536; Burns v. Richardson, supra, 384 U.S. at 92-96; Carrington v. Rash (1965) 380 U.S. 89, 93-97; Davis v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2004)

    California Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 2004

    (See, e.g., 86 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 205 (2003) [member of county board of supervisors]; 86 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 194 (2003) [school district board member]; 85 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 239 (2002) [community services district director]; … (Raven v. Deukmejian (1990) 52 Cal.3d 336 , 349 ; Woo v. Superior Court, supra, 183 Cal.App.4th at p. 976 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Nov 18, 1994

    (See Griffin Development Company v. City of Oxnard (1985) 39 Cal.3d 256, 261-264; Santa Monica Pines, Ltd. v. Rent Control Board (1984) 35 Cal.3d 858, 868-869; Birkenfeld v. City of Berkeley (1976) 17 Cal.3d 129, 140.) … (Cohen v. Board of Supervisors (1985) 40 Cal.3d 277, 290; A & B Cattle Co. v. City of Escondido (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 1032, 1038.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1999)

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 1999

    (See McBrearty v. City of Brawley (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 1441 , 1450 .) … (See Pasadena Police Officers Ass'n. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 1997

    (See Citizen Advocates, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 171, 178-179; Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. … of the board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · May 5, 1993

    The board may pay from any available funds such compensation as it deems proper for these special services. … VII, § 1), the Court of Appeal in California State Employees' Assn. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    California Attorney General Reports · Jul 24, 2003

    [C]ity officers or employees shall not be financially interested in any contract made by them in their official capacity, or by any body or board of which they are members." … McKinley , supra , 80 Cal.App.3d 204 [contract with architectural firm of which board member was president and stockholder]; People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Apr 20, 1988

    (See Brown v. Board of Police Commissioners (1943) 58 Cal.App.2d 473, 477.) Frequently a game will have elements of both skill and chance. … Spinning wheels to determine winning number; People v. Gonzales (1944) 62 Cal.App. 274, 277. Playing tango 2; Einzig v. Board of Police Commissioners (1934) 138 Cal.App. 664; People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Dec 29, 1995

    In Dibb v. … Neigel v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Dec 1, 1988

    (Santa Monica Pines, LTD, v. Rent Control Board (1984) 35 Cal.3d 858, 868-869; Griffin Development Co. v. … (Friends of Lake Arrowhead v. Board of Supervisors (1974) 38 Cal.App.3d 497, 505.) An implementing ordinance which is inconsistent with the language or intent of the Act is invalid.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2002)

    California Attorney General Reports · May 10, 2002

    A domicile is the place of physical presence coupled with the intention to make that place one's permanent home. ( Fenton v. Board of Directors (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 1107 , 1113-1114 .) … Fleming v. Shorb (1893) 100 Cal. 537 , 540-541 ; People v. Bright (1880) 55 Cal. 79 , 80 ; Nicolopulos v. City of Lawndale (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1221 , 1226 ; Klose v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 6, 1991

    Defendant was elected to one of the vacancies on the board of directors. … (City of Campbell v. Mosk (1961) 197 Cal.App.2d 640, 650.) While the availability of alternative remedies does not preclude an action in quo warranto as a matter of law (Citizens Utilities Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jun 2, 1987

    Corp. v. County of Placer (1953) 118 Cal.App.2d 684, 690.) … (See The City of Oakland v. Williams (1940) 15 Cal.2d 542, 549.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Apr 22, 1986

    (See County of Butte v. Superior Court (1985) 177 Cal.App.3d 693, 698; Hicks v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 228, 235.) … Assn. v. Pacific Utilities Com., (1979) 24 Cal.3d 836, 844.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2000)

    California Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 2000

    (See Pearsall v. Board of Administration (1978) 86 Cal.App.3d 125 , 128 .) Retirement and pension benefits of a retirement or pension system constitute deferred compensation for services performed. (Betts v. … Board of Administration (1978) 21 Cal.3d 859 , 863 ; Miller v. State of California (1977) 18 Cal.3d 808 , 814-815 ; Kern v. City of Long Beach (1947) 29 Cal.2d 848 , 851-853 ; Valdes v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 1991

    (See City of Oakland v. Brock (1937) 8 Cal.2d 639, 641; Stirling v. Board of Supervisors (1975) 48 Cal.App.3d 184, 187; County of Los Angeles v. City Council (1962) 202 Cal.App.2d 20, 26; City of South San Francisco v. … (See County of Los Angeles v. City Council (1968) 212 Cal.App.2d 160, 163-165; cf. City of Santa Ana v. Board of Education (1967) 255 Cal.App.2d 178, 180.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · May 10, 1995

    As explained by the Supreme Court in Dyna-Med, Inc. v. … (See Nutter v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 2020

    (a). 22 Sahlolbei v. … (Applebaum v. Board of Directors (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 648, 657.) 26 Sulla v. Board of Registered Nursing (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 1195, 1201; Sahlolbei v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.