Case law

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 1992

(See Irwin v. County of Yuba (1898) 119 Cal. 686, 690; L.A. Whse. Co. v. Los Angeles (1934) 139 Cal.App. 368, 371; compare 53 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 113 (1970) and 2 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 69 (1943).) … However, if the county board of supervisors has exercised it option pursuant to subdivision (c) to assess an additional penalty, a different conclusion is reached.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 16, 1999

V, § 1), Lieutenant Governor (Cal. Const., art. V, § 9), Attorney General (Cal. Const., art V, § 13), Controller (Cal. Const., art. V, § 11), Insurance Commissioner (Cal. Const., art. V, § 14, subd. … V, § 11), Treasurer (Cal. Const., art V, § 11), and members of the State Board of Equalization (Cal. Const., art. XIII, § 17).

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 1989

It can transfer all of these "or so many as the board names in its resolution." As succinctly stated by the Court in Beck v. … County of Los Angeles (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 1378, 1384-1385; and Boxx v. Board of Administration (1980) 114 Cal.App.3d 79, 85.

Opinion No. (2002)

California Attorney General Reports · May 7, 2002

(Fenton v. Board of Directors (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 1107 , 1113-1114 .) It is the "`fixed home of a party as understood by himself and his neighbors and friends.'" (Burt v. Scarborough (1961) 56 Cal.2d 817 , 820 .) … (See Chambers v. Hathaway (1921) 187 Cal. 104 ; Estate of Brady (1918) 177 Cal. 537 ; Estate of Gordon (1904) 142 Cal. 125 ; Fenton v. Board of Directors, supra, 156 Cal.App.3d at p. 1117 .)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 3, 2020

(Sturgeon v. … Board of Ed. of City and County of San Francisco (1944) 62 Cal.App.2d 706, 727–728. 28 See Gov. Code, § 1090 et seq.; Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Com. v.

Opinion No. (2004)

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 2004

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640 , 645 .) … (See Safer v. Superior Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 230 , 237-238 ; Board of Trustees v. Judge (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 920 , 927 .) However, section 21675.1 has no application to the situation under consideration here.

Opinion No. (2002)

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 10, 2002

City of San Jose (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 1076 , 1080 ; Henderson v. Board of Education (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 875 , 883 .) … (Meyer v. Board of Trustees (1961) 195 Cal.App.2d 420 , 431-432 .) In sum, the Legislature has not added the words "and copied" during the numerous times it has amended section 827 since our 1979 opinion.

Opinion No. (2006)

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 2006

(See People v. … [Citations.]'" ( Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police Comm. of the City of Los Angeles (1972) 7 Cal.3d 64 , 72 .)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1994

(Moore v. California State Board of Accountancy (1992) 2 Cal.4th 999, 1012.) "In determining intent, we look first to the language of the statute, giving effect to its `plain meaning.'" (Kimmel v. … (People v. Beck (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 209, 219.)

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1998

Code, § 11152 ; Gilmore v. State Personnel Board (1958) 161 Cal.App.2d 439 , 448 ; 39 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 261 , 264 (1962); 36 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 43 , 44 (1960).) A. … Board of Education (1968) 391 U.S. 563 , 572 ; Morrison v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 16, 1995

(Davis v. City of Berkeley (1990) 51 Cal.3d 227, 234; see San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 578-580.) … (See Raven v. Deukmejian (1990) 52 Cal.3d 336, 349; Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 30, 1994

(Moore v. California State Board of Accountancy (1992) 2 Cal.4th 999, 1012.) "`To discern legislative intent, we must examine the legislative history and statutory context of the act under scrutiny.'" … (People v. Woods (1970) 7 Cal.App.3d 382, 387; People v.

Opinion No. (1999)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 22, 1999

(See City of Hemet v. Superior Court (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1411 , 1430 ; Bradshaw v. … "[I]n view of the public purpose of the Brown Act, which is directed toward the conduct of public officials, we believe that section 1222 , Government Code . . . [is] here applicable. . . ."

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1986

(Yellin v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1985) 174 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1058-1059; Gore v. … Rather that is a determination for the Board of Dental Examiners to make upon expert testimony as to such. (Gore v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance, supra, 110 Cal.App.3d at 196; Thole v.

Opinion No. (2003)

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 24, 2003

[C]ity officers or employees shall not be financially interested in any contract made by them in their official capacity, or by any body or board of which they are members." … McKinley , supra , 80 Cal.App.3d 204 [contract with architectural firm of which board member was president and stockholder]; People v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 19, 1995

Com. v. Payne (1947) 31 Cal.2d 210, 213-214; Tyler v. State of California (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 973, 977.) … (O'Brien v. Dudenhoeffer (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 327, 334.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 1989

Thomas v. Dept. of Motor Veh. (1970) 3 Cal.3d 335, 338 (Department of Motor Vehicles); Schmitz v. … (See Fenske v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 29, 1995

In Dibb v. … Neigel v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 2, 1998

(Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior Court (1991) 53 Cal.3d 1180, 1186.) Each word is to be given its usual and ordinary meaning. (Da Fonte v. UpRight, Inc. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 593, 601.) … A charter granted by a school district governing board or county board of education may be granted one or more subsequent renewals by that entity.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 19, 2019

Code, §§ 16461, 16463, 16463.5; Cequel III Communications I, LLC v. … Code, §§ 16467 (board must fix charges “for commodities or service furnished by any revenue producing utility as will pay all of the expenses of the government of the district, or such portion as the board determines justly