Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalag

955 results

0.86s

  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 1996

    (Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV (1991) 52 Cal.3d 1142, 1159.) … Thus a person making investment decisions for a local agency while serving on a credit union's board of directors or committee would necessarily be faced with divided loyalties. (See People ex rel. Chapman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1996

    Chapman v. … divided between the two boards.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Apr 20, 1998

    The State Board of Equalization ("Board") administers these state taxes. (§ 7051.) … Co. v. Deukmejian (1989) 48 Cal.3d 805, 821.) In Monterey Peninsula Taxpayers Assn. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · May 3, 1990

    (See Geiger v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 48 Cal.2d 832, 836.) Conceivably, a tax levy to pay for the cost of a capital improvement may be the subject of a referendum. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · May 18, 1988

    (Moyer v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Board (1973) 10 Cal.3d 222, 230.) The section first speaks in terms of the "funds derived from the sale of surplus property." … (Pomona City School District v. Payne (1935) 9 Cal.App.2d 510, 516. See also, e.g., Board of Law Library Trustees v. Lowery (1945) 67 Cal.App.2d 480, 482; 71 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. (1988) (Op.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 1996

    (People v. Zamora (1980) 28 Cal.3d 88, 98; see also Wildlife Alive v. Chickering (1976) 18 Cal.3d 190, 196; Martello v. Superior Court (1927) 202 Cal. 400, 405; In re Fain (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 540, 550.) … (See Tom Hudson & Associates v. City of Chula Vista (9th Cir. 1984) 746 F.2d 1370, 1372-1374; City of Camarillo v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1998

    Fair Employment Housing Com . (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1379 , 1387 ), while arriving at an interpretation that effectuates the intent of the Legislature ( Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co . (1989) 48 Cal.3d 721 ,724). … [Citation.]" ( Freedom Newspapers, Inc . v. Orange County Employees Retirement System (1993) 6 Cal.4th 821 , 826 .) We give the words "their usual and ordinary meaning. [Citations.]" ( Dafonte v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jun 12, 1991

    All local sales and use tax ordinances are administered by the Board. (See §§ 7203.5-7204.3, 7209-7211.) As explained in Geiger v. … In Flynn v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Sep 11, 1996

    Dist. v. Dept. of Forestry & Fire Prot. (1996) 43 Cal.App.4th 1113, 1127; Laupheimer v. … (Sierra Club v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 1987

    (Byers v. Board of Supervisors (1968) 262 Cal. App. 2d 148, 157; 66 Ops. Cal. Atty. … (Uhl v. Baderacco (1926) 199 Cal. 270, 283; Cowell v. Martin (1872) 42 Cal. 605, 613; Bear River, Etc. Corp. v. County of Placer (1953) 118 Cal. App. 2d 684, 689; 64 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 804, 808 (1981).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    California Attorney General Reports · Feb 1, 2001

    of the board the transportation is advisable and good reasons exist therefor. … In Hopkins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 2022

    Code, §§ 4300– 4305 [authorizing county board of supervisors to appoint county advisory committee to annually inspect adult detention facilities as specified], 6031 [requiring Board of Corrections and Rehabilitation to inspect … (h); People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Aug 7, 1991

    Hunstock v. Estate Development Corp. (1943) 22 Cal.2d 205, 210-211; People v. … Tripp v. Swoap (1976) 17 Cal.3d 671, 679; Fuentes v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1976) 16 Cal.3d 1, 7; Lara v. Board of Supervisors (1976) 59 Cal.App.3d 399, 408-409; People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Sep 13, 1995

    (Sands v. Superior Court (1983) 34 Cal.3d 567, 570; accord, Long Beach Police Officers Assn. v. City of Long Beach (1988) 46 Cal.3d 736, 743.) … (Hutnick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 456, 465, fn. 7.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1990

    "(See also, generally, People ex rel Chapman v. … In Schaefer v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Oct 6, 1992

    See, e.g., Brown v. … See Brosnahan v. Brown (1982) 32 Cal.3d 236.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 1987

    (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645; accord People v. Craft (1986) 41 Cal.3d 554, 559.) … Assn. v. Public Utilities Com. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 836, 844; see Fields v. Eu (1976) 18 Cal.3d 322, 328; Sanchez v. South Hoover Hospital (1976) 18 Cal.3d 93, 98.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2005)

    California Attorney General Reports · Apr 6, 2005

    The consignee (agent) receives a commission and not the profits of the sale.' " (Consolidated Accessories Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 1036 , 1040 ; see Jackson v. … While the distinction between a sale and a consignment may at times be subtle (see Consolidated Accessories Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 161 Cal.App.3d at pp. 1040-1041; Reiter v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 28, 2001

    (See Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977) 431 U.S. 209 , 235-236 ; Machinists v. Street (1961) 367 U.S. 740 , 768 ; Kidwell v. Transportation Com. Intern. Union (4th Cir. 1991) 946 F.2d 283 , 300 .) … (See Stanson v. Mott (1976) 17 Cal.3d 206 ; County of Ventura v. State Bar (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 1055 ; 73 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 255 (1990).)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jan 13, 1994

    (See Griffin Development Company v. City of Oxnard (1985) 39 Cal.3d 256, 261-264; Santa Monica Pines, Ltd. v. Rent Control Board (1984) 35 Cal.3d 858, 868- 869; Birkenfeld v. … Board of Trustees (1904) 144 Cal. 281, 283; City and County of San Francisco v. Patterson (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 95, 105; Campen v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.