Case law

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 1998

(See San Marcos Water Dist . v. San Marcos Unified School Dist ., supra , 42 Cal.3d at 161 -162 ; Shapell Industries, Inc . v. Governing Board (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 218 , 234 ; J.W. Jones Companies v. … As stated in San Marcos Water Dist . v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 13, 1994

(See County of Santa Clara v. Deputy Sheriffs' Assn. (1992) 3 Cal.4th 873; Beck v. County of Santa Clara (1988) 204 Cal.App.3d 789.) … (Reuter v. Board of Supervisors (1934) 220 Cal. 314, 320-321; Kelly v. Kane (1939) 34 Cal.App.2d 588, 591; More v. Board of Supervisors (1916) 31 Cal.App. 388, 392-393.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1996

Governing Board (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1383, 1391-1392; Savage v. Trammell Crow Co., Inc. (1990) 223 Cal.App.3d 1562, 1572-1573; U.C. Nuclear Weapons Lab Conversion Project v. … (See American Civil Liberties Union v. Board of Education (1963) 59 Cal.2d 203, 208; Danskin v. San Diego Unified Sch. Dist. (1946) 28 Cal.2d 536, 540; Goodman v. Board of Education (1941) 48 Cal.App.2d 731, 734-738.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1993

Board of Supervisors (1957) 48 Cal.2d 832, 836-839; City of Westminster v. County of Orange (1988) 204 Cal.App.3d 623, 627-628; City of Atascadero v. Daly (1982) 135 Cal.App.3d 466, 470; Myers v. … Board of Supervisors (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 990, 993-995; Dare v. Lakeport City Council (1970) 12 Cal.App.3d 864, 866-869).

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 1994

(Dickey v. Retirement Board (1976) 16 Cal.3d 745, 748.) … (See, in addition to Willens and Pearson, supra, Skaggs v. City of Los Angeles (1954) 43 Cal.2d 497; cf. MacIntyre v. Retirement Board of S.F. (1941) 42 Cal.App.2d 734.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 1989

State Board of Pharmacy (1968) 265 Cal.App.2d 179, 192-194.) In Vermont & 110th Medical Arts Pharmacy v. … The conclusion was based upon a misreading of our prior opinions, NS 3290 and 10428, as well as Williams v. Wheeler, supra, 23 Cal.App. 619, and Davie v. Board of Regents, etc., supra, 66 Cal.App. 693.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1997

(See Dibb v. County of San Diego (1994) 8 Cal.4th 1200, 1212; 78 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 362, 364-365 (1995); 74 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 82, 83 (1991).) In Schaefer v. … People v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 3, 1997

(Dix v. Superior Court 1991) 53 Cal.3d 442, 460.) … All of these statutes may be read together and harmonized (see People v. Hull (1991) 1 Cal.4th 266, 272; People v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 12, 1991

All local sales and use tax ordinances are administered by the Board. (See §§ 7203.5-7204.3, 7209-7211.) As explained in Geiger v. … In Flynn v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 16, 1996

(Ferdig v. State Personnel Board (1969) 71 Cal.2d 96, 103-104; Rich Vision Centers, Inc. v. Board of Medical Examiners (1983) 144 Cal.App. 3d 110, 114.) … (Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1 (1944) 24 Cal.2d 796, 810; see also Stackler v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 240, 245.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1987

(Rauer v. … (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645; accord, People v. Craft (1986) 41 Cal.3d 554, 559.) "[W]hen interpreting a statute, if its provisions are unclear, its purpose is paramount."

Opinion No. (2001)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 1, 2001

of the board the transportation is advisable and good reasons exist therefor. … In Hopkins v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 13, 1998

Co. v. Deukmejian (1989) 48 Cal.3d 805, 824-825; Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1 (1944) 26 Cal.2d 796, 810; Rich Vision Centers, Inc. v. Board of Medical Examiners (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 110, 114; Stackler v. … (See California Housing Finance Agency v. Elliot (1976) 17 Cal.3d 575, 583; Mannheim v. Superior Court (1970) 3 Cal.3d 678, 690-691; California Emp. Etc. Com. v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 18, 1988

(Moyer v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Board (1973) 10 Cal.3d 222, 230.) The section first speaks in terms of the "funds derived from the sale of surplus property." … (Pomona City School District v. Payne (1935) 9 Cal.App.2d 510, 516. See also, e.g., Board of Law Library Trustees v. Lowery (1945) 67 Cal.App.2d 480, 482; 71 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. (1988) (Op.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 1998

Whether a member of a state board, commission, or committee exercises a portion of the sovereignty of the state depends upon the particular circumstances. In People ex rel. Chapman v. … (See, e.g., Briggs v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1996

Chapman v. … divided between the two boards.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 13, 1995

(Sands v. Superior Court (1983) 34 Cal.3d 567, 570; accord, Long Beach Police Officers Assn. v. City of Long Beach (1988) 46 Cal.3d 736, 743.) … (Hutnick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 456, 465, fn. 7.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 13, 1993

Chapman v. … In Schaefer v.

Opinion No. (2005)

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 6, 2005

The consignee (agent) receives a commission and not the profits of the sale.' " (Consolidated Accessories Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 1036 , 1040 ; see Jackson v. … While the distinction between a sale and a consignment may at times be subtle (see Consolidated Accessories Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 161 Cal.App.3d at pp. 1040-1041; Reiter v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 1987

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645; accord People v. Craft (1986) 41 Cal.3d 554, 559.) … Assn. v. Public Utilities Com. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 836, 844; see Fields v. Eu (1976) 18 Cal.3d 322, 328; Sanchez v. South Hoover Hospital (1976) 18 Cal.3d 93, 98.)