Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalag

955 results

1.69s

  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1997

    In Buckley v. … Buckley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 1998

    As we explained in 78 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 60, 62-63 (1985): "In American Canyon Fire Protection Dist. v. … (McClain v. County of Alameda (1962) 209 Cal.App.2d 73, 79.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1998

    In Pala Band of Mission Indians v. Board of Supervisors (1997) 54 Cal.App.4th 565, 580, the court concluded that the term "statute" could include local ordinances, depending upon the circumstances. … In California Aviation Council v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Sep 24, 1998

    In City of Stockton v. … In Stockton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1990

    (See generally CBS, Inc. v. … While the burden is upon the Board to justify withholding the plans and specifications (see CBS, Inc. v. Block, supra, 42 Cal.3d 646, 652; New York Times Co. v. Superior Court, supra, 218 Cal.App.3d 1579, 1584; Braun v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 4, 1998

    For purposes of section 1090, board members are conclusively presumed to be involved in the making of contracts under their jurisdiction. (Thompson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633, 649; Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. … (See Thomson v. Call, supra, 38 Cal.3d 633; Frazer-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del Norte, supra, 68 Cal.App.3d 201; People v. Valerga (1977) 67 Cal. App.3d 847; People v. Sobel, supra, 40 Cal.App.3d 1046; People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1995

    In American Canyon Fire Protection Dist. v. … As stated in Neigel v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1995

    (See Magit v. … (Cf., Cleveland Chiropractic College v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 1991

    Sand v. Superior Court (1983) 34 Cal.3d 567, 570; Great Lake Properties, Inc. v. City of El Segundo (1977) 19 Cal.3d 152, 153; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equalization (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645.) … (Town of Atherton v. Superior Court (1958) 159 Cal.App.2d 417, 421, citing Hall v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    California Attorney General Reports · Sep 5, 2001

    (Thomson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633 , 645 ; see Moody v. Shuffleton (1928) 203 Cal. 100 , 102-105 ; Terry v. Bender (1956) 143 Cal.App.2d 198 , 207-208 ; People v. Darby (1952) 114 Cal.App.2d 412 , 431-432 .) … Moreover, the statutory prohibition cannot be avoided by having the board member with the proscribed financial interest abstain from participating in the decision-making process. (Frazer-Yamor Agency, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1997

    In Choice-in-Education League v. … (Industrial Indemnity Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    California Attorney General Reports · Jul 16, 1998

    In AB Cattle Co . v. … In Miller v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1987

    In California State Employees' Assn. v. … Nevertheless, it is not the view of the board of governors that is controlling but rather "the intent and objective of the drafters of the provision and the people by whose vote it was adopted" (Mosk v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 1987

    California Teachers Assn. v. Board of Education, supra, 109 Cal.App.3d 738, 745.) … Priest (1974) 12 Cal.3d 593, 604; Board of Trustees v. Cory, supra, 79 Cal.App.3d 661, 666-667; Bowker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1990

    (Cf., Safer v. Superior Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 230, 236, 238; People v. Moore (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 898, 903; Board of Trustees v. … (Fenton v. Board of Directors, supra, 156 Cal.App.3d at 1117.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 1992

    (See, Dry Creek Valley Association, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 839, 845; Fisher v. Board of Police Commissioners (1965) 236 Cal.App.2d 298.) … The provision looks to the body constituting the board of directors, rather than to the individuals of whom the board is composed." (Id. at 106; cf. Hopkins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · May 19, 1987

    (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645.) … (See People v. Brown (1979) 88 Cal.App.3d 283, 290; People v. Schad (1971) 21 Cal.App.3d 201, 209; People v. Kemick (1971) 17 Cal.App.3d 419, 421-422.) In Perino v. St.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1997)

    California Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1997

    "(d) Any hearing conducted under this section shall be held before a three-member board. … (See California Correctional Peace Officers Assn . v. State Personnel Bd . (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1133 , 1147 ["a practical construction is preferred"]; Harris v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 17, 1993

    Code, §§ 66458, 66473, 66474.1; Santa Monica Pines, Ltd. v. Rent Control Board (1984) 35 Cal.3d 858, 865; Youngblood v. Board of Supervisors (1978) 22 Cal.3d 644, 653.) 7. … (Da Vinci Group v. San Francisco Residential Rent etc. Bd. (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 24, 28; see Goins v. Board of Pension Commissioners (1979) 96 Cal.App.3d 1005, 1009; see also Board of Medical Quality Assurance v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 2018

    Proc., § 803; see Rando v. … Ct. (1976) 56 Cal.App.3d 399, 406; City of Campbell v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.