Case law

Opinion No. (1997)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 1997

As explained by the Supreme Court in Dyna-Med., Inc . v. … (See Tot v. U.S . (1943) 319 U.S. 463 , 466-468 ; Rafaelli v. Committee of Bar Examiners (1972) 7 Cal.3d 288 , 291-301 ; Mike Moore's 24-Hour Towing v. City of San Diego (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1294 , 1306 .)

Opinion No. (2006)

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 25, 2006

(a), 66474.1; Youngblood v. … (See Citizen Advocates, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 171 , 178-179 ; Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. Del Norte County (1977) 68 Cal.App.3d 201 , 217-218 ; 81 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra, at pp. 375-376.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 2018

Chapman v. … (Cerini v.

Opinion No. (2006)

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 24, 2006

(See Moore v. California State Bd. of Accountancy (1992) 2 Cal.4th 999 , 1011-1012 ; Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment Housing Com. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1379 , 1391 , fn. 14; Texas Commerce Bank v. … Garamendi (1992) 11 Cal.App.4th 460 , 471 , fn. 3; Martin v. Holiday Inns, Inc. (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 1434 , 1437 ; People v. Stout (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 172 , 177 .) In Harris v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 16, 2021

(Beck Development Co. v. … (g). 18 See Lennane v.

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 1998

[Citation.]" ( Rich v. State Board of Optometry (1965) 235 Cal.App.3d 591 , 607 ; accord, Silva v. Superior Court (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 562 , 570 ; see also California Mfrs. Assn . v. … (d)) and statutory (§§ 23080 - 23083 ) right to appeal a revocation or suspension by the Department to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board ("Board").

Opinion No. (2006)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 2006

(See People v. … (a), 66499; see also § 66473; Soderling v.

Opinion No. (2005)

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 2005

(Thomson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633 , 647-649 ; Stigall v. City of Taft (1962) 58 Cal.2d 565 , 569 ; City of Imperial Beach v. … In Eldridge v.

Opinion No. (1999)

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 1999

(See Walters v. Weed (1988) 45 Cal.3d 1 , 7 ; Smith v. Smith (1955) 45 Cal.2d 235 , 239 ; DeMiglio v. Mashore (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 1260 , 1268 ; Fenton v. … Our analysis relied primarily on the case of Klose v. Superior Court (1950) 96 Cal.App.2d 913 .

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 2018

Chapman v. … (Cerini v.

Opinion No. (2001)

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 2001

(See Safer v. Superior Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 230 , 236-238 ; Board of Trustees v. … (Cumero v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 1993

(See Amezcua v. City of Pomona, supra, 170 Cal.App.3d 305, 309-310; Barenfeld v. City of Los Angeles (1984) 162 Cal.App.3d 1035, 1040; O'Hagen v. Board of Zoning Adjustment (1971) 19 Cal.App.3d 151, 158; Carlin v. … (O'Hagen v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra, 19 Cal.App.3d 151, 158.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 2017

Pacific Railroad Co. v. … I, § 22; Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Dist. (1973) 410 U.S. 719, 726-730; Tarpey v.

Opinion No. (2002)

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 2002

(See Roberts v. City of Palmdale (1993) 5 Cal.4th 363 , 373-377 ; Frazer v. Dixon Unified School Dist. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 781 , 794-798 .) Moreover, cases may be discussed without identifying the parties involved. … (California State University, Fresno Assn., Inc. v. Superior Court (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 810 , 830 .)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 16, 2021

Lee v. Prewitt (1899) 124 Cal. 7, 10-11; People ex rel. McKune v. Weller (1858) 11 Cal. 49, 64; People v. Porter (1856) 6 Cal. 26, 29; accord, State ex rel. Lanier v Hall (N.D. 1946) 23 N.W.2d 44, 49; People ex rel. … Sess.); see Van Horn v.

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 1998

[Citations.]" ( DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc . (1992) 2 Cal.4th 593 , 601 .) … In Lungren v.

California Attorney General Opinion 24-802

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 22, 2026

Public Employment Relations Board (2018) 5 Cal.5th 898, 904-911 (Boling I). 3 Id. at p. 904. … Kerr v.

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 2, 1998

Each word is to be given its usual and ordinary meaning. ( Da Fonte v. UpRight, Inc . (1992) 2 Cal.4th 593 , 601 .) … A charter granted by a school district governing board or county board of education may be granted one or more subsequent renewals by that entity. Each renewal shall be for a period not to exceed five years.

Opinion No. (2004)

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 9, 2004

(Thompson v. Department of Corrections (2001) 25 Cal.4th 117 , 122 .) In determining that intent, we "look first to the language of the constitutional text, giving the words their ordinary meaning." (Leone v. … Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660 , 665 .) " `A constitutional amendment should be construed in accordance with the natural and ordinary meaning of its words. [Citation.]' " (Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc. v.

Opinion No. (2000)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 2000

(Cumero v. Public Employment Relations Board (1989) 49 Cal.3d 575 , 591 ; 81 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 218 , 220-221 (1998).) … of Education and ultimately the State Board of Education.