Case law

Opinion No. (2005)

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 7, 2005

(California State University, Fresno Assn., Inc. v. Superior Court (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 810 , 826 , 829 ; Wanee v. Board of Directors (1976) 56 Cal.App.3d 644 , 648-649 ; see also Coppernoll v. … (See generally Keller v. State Bar of California (1990) 496 U.S. 1 ; Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977) 431 U.S. 209 .)

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 1998

Whether a member of a state board, commission, or committee exercises a portion of the sovereignty of the state depends upon the particular circumstances. In People ex rel. Chapman v. … (See, e.g., Briggs v.

Opinion No. (2002)

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 29, 2002

[Citations.]" ( Viking Pools, Inc. v. Maloney (1989) 48 Cal.3d 602, 606-607 ; see also Hydrotech Systems, Ltd v. Oasis Waterpark (1991) 52 Cal.3d 988 , 995 ; Hughes v. … Board of Architectural Examiners (1998) 17 Cal.4th 763 , 786 ; Tehis v. Contractors "State License Board(2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 153 , 164 ; 65 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 25 , 26 (1982).)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 1999

(Brown v. City of Berkeley (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 223, 231; accord, Simons v. City of Los Angeles (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 924, 934.) … In Board of Supervisors v.

Opinion No. (2006)

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 1, 2006

(a); Fenton v. Board of Directors, supra, 156 Cal.App.3d at pp. 1113-1114; 79 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 21 , 25-26 (1990).) … Although a person may have more than one physical residence at any given time, he or she has only one domicile. ( Smith v. Smith, supra, 45 Cal.2d at p. 239 ; DeMiglio v.

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 1998

[Citation.]" ( Larson v. State Personnel Bd . (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 265 , 276-277 .) … Code, § 835 ; Peterson v. San Francisco Community College Dist . (1984) 36 Cal.3d 799 ; Bartell v. Palos Verdes Penisula Sch. Dist . (1978) 83 Cal.App.3d 492 .)

Opinion No. (2006)

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 12, 2006

(See Stanson v. Mott (1976) 17 Cal.3d 206 , 216-219 ; Mines v. Del Valle (1927) 201 Cal. 273 , 287 ; League of Women Voters v. Countywide Crim. … [Citation.]" ( Betts v. Board of Administration (1978) 21 Cal.3d 859 , 863 ; see Cory v. Valdes (1983) 139 Cal.App.3d 773 , 783-784 .)

Opinion No. (1997)

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 3, 1997

[Citation.]." ( Dix v. Superior Court 1991) 53 Cal.3d 442 , 460 .) … All of these statutes may be read together and harmonized (see People v. Hull (1991) 1 Cal.4th 266 , 272 ; People v.

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 20, 1998

The State Board of Equalization ("Board") administers these state taxes. (§ 7051 .) … Co . v. Deukmejian (1989) 48 Cal.3d 805 , 821 .) In Monterey Peninsula Taxpayers Assn . v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 2019

Chapman v. … , Inc. v.

Opinion No. (2002)

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 3, 2002

Code, § 22.2 ; Mott v. Horstmann (1950) 36 Cal.2d 388 , 391-392 ; People ex rel. Chapman v. Rapsey (1940) 16 Cal.2d 636 , 640-644 ; Eldridge v. Sierra View Local Hospital Dist. (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 311 , 319 .) … Chapman v.

Opinion No. (2000)

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 2000

(Woods v. Young (1991) 53 Cal.3d 315 , 323 .) … (California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. v. State Personnel Board (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1133 , 1147 .)

Opinion No. (2004)

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 14, 2004

Code, § 22.2 ; Mott v. Horstmann (1950) 36 Cal.2d 388 , 391-392 ; People ex rel. Chapman v. Rapsey, supra, 16 Cal.2d at pp. 640-644 ; Eldridge v. … Chapman v.

Opinion No. (2002)

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 2002

(California Teachers Assn. v. Governing Bd. of Rialto Unified School Dist. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 627 , 634 ; DuBois v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1993) 5 Cal.4th 382 388; Woods v. Young (1991) 53 Cal.3d 315 , 323 .) … (People v. Cruz (1996) 13 Cal.4th 764 , 773-774 , fn. 5.)

Opinion No. (2005)

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 2005

abstaining from participation in the decision-making process; the entire board is prohibited from executing the agreement where the prohibition is applicable. ( Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. … (See Stigall v.

Opinion No. (2006)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 9, 2006

(See Ventura Group Ventures, Inc. v. Ventura Port Dist. (2001) 24 Cal.4th 1089 , 1099 ; Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208 , 246 ; White v. … (See §§ 93-100.9; American Canyon Fire Protection Dist. v.

Opinion No. (2003)

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 2003

Assn. v. Public Utilities Com. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 836 , 844 .) … We have interpreted section 30056 "`so as to effectuate the purpose of the law'" ( Curle v.

Opinion No. (2010)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 2010

Found. v. Brown , 29 Cal. 3d 168 , 180 (1981). 25 Metro. Water Dist. of S. Cal. v. Dorff , 98 Cal. App. 3d 109 , 113 (1979). 26 City Co. of San Francisco v. … Found. v. Brown , 29 Cal. 3d at 180 . 36 See id. 37 See Kizziah v. Dept. of Transp. , 121 Cal. App. 3d at 18 . 38 See Assembly Educ. Comm. Analysis of Assem. Bill 3018 (Apr. 7, 1980) at 1-2. 39 Op. Leg.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 5, 2022

Proc., § 803; see Rando v. … Chapman v.

Opinion No. (2005)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 2005

Com. v. Payne (1947) 31 Cal.2d 210 , 216 ; see also County of Alameda v. Janssen (1940) 16 Cal.2d 276 , 281 ; Johnston v. … Riley (1944) 24 Cal.2d 912 , 917 ; Seymour v.