Case law

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 2023

The eleventh Board seat remains vacant. 9 Code Civ. Proc., § 803; Nicolopulos v. City of Lawndale (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1221, 1225; 76 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 157, 162-163 (1993). 10 Rando v. … Harris (2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 868, 879; 72 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 15, 20 (1989). 11 See 105 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 65, 67 (2022); Nicolopulos v.

Opinion No. (2002)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 14, 2002

(Id. at pp. 211-214; see also Herrington v. Weigel (1978) 82 Cal.App.3d 676 , 685-686 ; Montgomery v. County of Contra Costa (1965) 235 Cal.App.2d 759 , 764 , 767-768 .) 1. … (Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973 , 977 .) 3 We are to interpret a statute by giving it "a practical construction" (California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. v.

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 16, 1998

(See Peralta Federation of Teachers v. Peralta Community College Dist . (1979) 24 Cal.3d 369 , 387 ; Holbrook v. Board of Education (1951) 37 Cal.2d 316 , 333-334 ; Jensen v. … Board of Trustees (1974) 43 Cal.App.3d 945 , 948 ; Vittal v. Long Beach Unified Sch. Dist . (1970) 8 Cal.App.3d 112 , 118 ; LaRue v. Board of Trustees (1940) 40 Cal.App.2d 287 , 293 ; Hogsett v.

Opinion No. (2003)

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 2003

Code, §§ 31450 - 31898 ) 1 to provide for retirement benefits for county employees. ( See Traub v. Board of Retirement (1983) 34 Cal.3d 793 ; 80 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 11 (1997); 79 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 95 (1996).) … While an alternate on a board may have certain rights and meet certain qualifications (see, e.g., Candlestick Properties, Inc. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation etc.

Opinion No. (1997)

California Attorney General Reports · May 28, 1997

In Harvey v. … Assn . v.

Opinion No. (2001)

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 3, 2001

. 191 , 194 (1990) [Government Code section 1090 "would clearly prevent a school board member from becoming a teacher in the same district"]; see Thomson v. … Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633 , 649-650 ; People v. Honig (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 289 , 313-318 ; Eldridge v. Sierra View Local Hospital Dist. (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 311 , 321 ; City of Imperial Beach v.

Opinion No. (2003)

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 10, 2003

In Rodriguez v. … (See, e.g., Gillespie v. San Francisco Pub. Library Com. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1165 , 1171 ; Harrington v. Pardee (1905) 1 Cal.App. 278 , 279 .)

Opinion No. (2004)

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 26, 2004

(See Sapp v. Barenfeld (1949) 34 Cal.2d 515 , 522-523 ; Baldwin Co. v. Rainey Construction Co. (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 1053 , 1058 , fn. 3; Arco Alaska v. Superior Court (1985) 168 Cal.App.3d 139 , 148 ; Cothron v. … (DaFonte v.

Opinion No. (2000)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 8, 2000

City of San Diego (1998) 18 Cal.4th 1035 , 1050 ; Thurston v. Southern Cal. Public Power Authority (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 236 , 238 ; People v. Shepherd (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 334 , 337 ; County of San Joaquin v. … (See Harbach v. El Pueblo de Los Angeles etc. com. (1971) 14 Cal.3d 828 , 834 [joint powers agency board member may exercise discretion in voting similar to a city council member].)

Opinion No. (2005)

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 2005

Toward that end, the Board regulates employer-employee relations in the agriculture industry. (See Agricultural Labor Relations Bd. v. … Chapman v. Rapsey (1940) 16 Cal.2d 636 , 639-640 ; Coulter v.

Opinion No. (2000)

California Attorney General Reports · May 3, 2000

(Cumero v. Public Employment Relations Board (1989) 49 Cal.3d 575 , 591 ; 81 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 218 , 220-221 (1998).) … In TRIM, Inc. v.

Opinion No. (2001)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 7, 2001

We entertain little doubt that a Board member holds a public office. (See People ex rel. Chapman v. Rapsey (1940) 16 Cal.2d 636 , 639-640 .) … (See People v. Rodgers (1897) 118 Cal. 393 , 397 .) 1 Such a claim may be brought in an action other than quo warranto, where the issue of entitlement to office is only incidentally involved. (Klose v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 18, 2023

Lacey v. … Lacey v.

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 1998

In Cumero v. Public Employment Relations Board , supra , 49 Cal.3d at 591 , the court stated: ". . . … San Antonio Community College District v. Public Employment Relations Board (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 178 ; Santa Monica Community College District v. Public Employment Relations Board (1980) 112 Cal.App.3d 684 ).

Opinion No. (1999)

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 1999

(Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment Housing Com. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1379 , 1386 .) In ascertaining legislative intent, we turn first to the language used (Tracy v. … (See California Teachers Assn. v.

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 5, 1998

(See Walters v. Reed (1988) 45 Cal.3d 1 , 7 ; Smith v. Smith (1955) 45 Cal.2d 235 , 239 ; Fenton v. … PUBLIC INTEREST As stated in City of Campbell v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 16, 1997

Dist. (1946) 28 Cal.2d 536, 540; Goodman v. Board of Education (1941) 48 Cal.App.2d 731, 734-738.) … (See California Teachers Assn v. Governing Board (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1383, 1391-1392; Savage v. Trammell Crow Con., Inc. (1990) 223 Cal.App.3d 1562, 1572-1573; U.C.

Opinion No. (1997)

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1997

"Generally, the same rules of construction and interpretation that apply to statutes govern the construction and interpretation of an administrative agency's rules and regulations." ( Industrial Indemnity Co . v. … regulations are to be interpreted by "giving to the language its usual, ordinary import and according significance, if possible, to every word, phrase and sentence in pursuance of the legislative purpose." ( Dyna-Med, Inc . v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 30, 2023

Chapman v. … Chapman v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 20, 1993

Wallace v. Jaffree (1985) 472 U.S. 38, 50. The Establishment Clause was originally intended to "erect a wall of separation between church and state." Everson v. Board of Education (1947) 330 U.S. 1, 16. … Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York v. Fox (1989) 492 U.S. 469, 477. It, therefore, may be subject to greater government regulation than non-commercial speech. City of Cincinnati v.