Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalag

955 results

1.30s

  • Opinion No. (2003)

    California Attorney General Reports · Sep 3, 2003

    If, as here, the public officer is a board member, this prohibition extends to the board on which he serves. (See Thomson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633 .) … McKinley , supra , 80 Cal.App.3d 204 [contract with architectural firm of which board member was president and stockholder]; People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · May 29, 1998

    Attorney General : : ______________________________________________________________________ THE HONORABLE VALERIE BROWN … In Moody v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 1991

    At one time it may have been argued that the appointment to a city board or commission affected a fundamental right so as to require application of the strict scrutiny test. (See Zeilenga v. … (See Anderson v. Celebrezze (1983) 460 U.S. 780, 786, fn. 7; Storer v. Brown (1974) 415 U.S. 724, 728-735; United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n (1944) 322 U.S. 533, 562; Erum v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1999)

    California Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1999

    (See Pomona Officers' Assn. v. City of Pomona (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 578 , 584-585 ; Board of Administration v. Wilson (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1109 , 1119-1120 ; Oden v. … Board of Administration (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 194 , 198 ; Claypool v. Wilson (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 646 , 653-655 ; City of Sacramento v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    California Attorney General Reports · Oct 22, 2003

    (Stigall v. City of Taft (1962) 58 Cal.2d 656 , 569; Finnegan v. Schrader (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 572 , 579-580 ; Thorpe v. Long Beach Community College Dist. (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 655 , 659 ; Frazer-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. … (See also Thomson v. Call, supra, 38 Cal.3d at pp. 648-649; Stigall v. City of Taft, supra, 58 Cal.3d at p. 571; City Council v. McKinley, supra, 80 Cal.App.3d at p. 212 ; People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2006)

    California Attorney General Reports · Aug 7, 2006

    Chapman v. … (See §§ 31453, 31453.5, 31530-31536, 31580-31619; Bandt v. Board of Retirement (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 140 , 150-155 ; In re Retirement Cases (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 426 , 438-439 ; Westly v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Sep 24, 2021

    Coastal Com. v. … (a); Ward v. San Diego School 69 Dist. (1928) 203 Cal. 712, 718-719; Kirchmann v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2004)

    California Attorney General Reports · Feb 26, 2004

    Public Employment Relations Bd. (1991) 228 Cal.App.3d 166 , 169 ; Grimsley v. Board of Trustees (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 1440 , 1448 .) … I to Accountant II requiring board approval]; see also Thorpe v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2005)

    California Attorney General Reports · May 11, 2005

    (People v. Zamora (1980) 28 Cal.3d 88 , 98 ; Wildlife Alive v. Chickering, supra, 18 Cal.3d at p. 196 ; 76 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 86 , 89 (1993).) … (Connolly v. County of Orange (1992) 1 Cal.4th 1105 , 1113 , fn. 9.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2006)

    California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 2006

    California's civil service encompasses every state employee and officer except those who are the subject of an exemption specified in the Constitution. ( Professional Engineers v. … Department of Transportation (1997) 15 Cal.4th 543 , 548 ; California State Employees' Assn. v. Williams (1970) 7 Cal.3d 390 , 395 ; 67 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 27 , 28 (1984); 65 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 475 , 479-480 (1982).)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2004)

    California Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 2004

    (See Eldridge v. … (Thomson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633 , 647-649 ; Stigall v. City of Taft, supra, 58 Cal.2d at p. 569 ; City of Imperial Beach v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2005)

    California Attorney General Reports · Oct 4, 2005

    (See, e.g., Board of Administration v. Wilson (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1109 , 1140 , 1150-1151 ; United Firefighters of Los Angeles City v. City of Los Angeles (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 1095 , 1112 .) … Board of Retirement, supra, 41 Cal.App.4th 1180 , and Westly v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    California Attorney General Reports · Jun 2, 2003

    (See Singh v. Board of Retirement (1996) 41 Cal.App.4th 1180 , 1183 , 1191-1192 .) … Union, Local No. 22 v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2006)

    California Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 2006

    (See §§ 22870, 22871, 22880, 22881, 22885, 22890, 22892, 22893, 22899, 22901; Valdes v. Cory (1983) 139 Cal.App.3d 773 , 783-789 ; see also Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System v. … (See §§ 16300, 16301; Riley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2002)

    California Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 2002

    (See Grupe Development Co. v. Superior Court (1993) 4 Cal.4th 911 , 915-923 ; Loyola Marymount University v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1256 , 1262-1263 ; Canyon North Co. v. … Dist. v. City of Corona (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 1577 , 1583-1587 ; Shapell Industries, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 2001

    We entertain little doubt that a Board director holds a public office. (See People ex rel. Chapman v. … (Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV (1991) 52 Cal.3d 1142 , 1159 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2000)

    California Attorney General Reports · May 2, 2000

    Board of Supervisors (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 1004 , 1012 ["It may be presumed that the Board will comply with the law"]; San Bernardino County Flood Etc. Dist. v. … Board of Supervisors v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Oct 29, 2021

    Proc., § 803; Nicolopulos v. City of Lawndale (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1221, 1225; 76 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 157, 162-163 (1993). 9 Code Civ. Proc., § 803; see Rando v. … (See Moore v. Panish (1982) 32 Cal.3d 535, 545; People ex rel. Chapman v. Rapsey (1940) 16 Cal.2d 636, 637-640 (Rapsey); 98 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra, at pp. 96-97.) 12 Gov.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    California Attorney General Reports · Dec 1, 1998

    In making its determination, the Board uses a "pooling" formula approved by the court in City of San Joaquin v. State Board of Equalization (1970) 9 Cal.App.3d 365 . … (See Sav-On Drugs, Inc. v. Superior Court, supra, 15 Cal.3d at 6 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1997)

    California Attorney General Reports · Jan 7, 1997

    [Citation.]" ( Burden v. Snowden (1992) 2 Cal.4th 556 , 562 .) … (See Traub v. Board of Retirement , supra , 34 Cal.3d at p. 798 ; Summerford v. Board of Retirement (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 128 , 132 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.