Case law

Draper v. Aceto

113 Cal. Rptr. 2d 61 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2001

In Summers v. … Baxter, J., Chin, J., Brown, J., and Marchiano, J., * concurred. All further undesignated statutory references are to the Labor Code.

Garcia v. Industrial Accident Commission

41 Cal. 2d 689 · California Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1953

Brown, Attorney General, Irving H. Perluss, Assistant Attorney General, William L. Shaw and Vincent P. Lafferty, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondents. *691 SCHAUER, J. … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

In re Estate of McDevitt

95 Cal. 17 · California Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1892

(Waterman v. Whitney, 11 N. Y. 157 ; 62 Am. Dec. 71 .) … For his board at the house of Andrew he never paid or offered to pay one cent. He required more money than he was getting for rents, to improve his property.

People v. Box

99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 69 · California Supreme Court · Aug 17, 2000

*1171 Opinion BROWN,J. A jury found defendant Christopher Clark Box and Manuel Flores, Jr., guilty of the first degree murders of April Gilhousen, her three-year-old son Bryan, and a houseguest, Kevin Chandler (Pen. … Moreover, Zigelbaum was not board-certified in either psychiatry or forensic psychiatry.

Vanderslice v. Hanks

3 Cal. 27 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1852

In some of them, also, as in Lebois v. Brommell, 4 How.; Blanc v. Lafayette, 11 How.; Lecompte v. United States, 11 How.; and Menard’s Heirs v. … The same question arose in the case of Taylor & Quarle v. *43 Brown, 5 Graneh.

Parker v. Otis

130 Cal. 322 · California Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1900

(Kullman v. Simmens, 104 Cal. 595 ; Sheehy v. Shinn, supra). The court will always see that legitimate business transactions are not brought under the ban. *Page 330 5. … (See Sheehy v. Shinn, supra, and cases there referred to; Kullman v. Simmens, supra.) 6.

Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach

216 Cal. Rptr. 3d 306 · California Supreme Court · Mar 30, 2017

Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564), we accord greater deference to the agency‟s substantive factual conclusions. … (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 52 Cal.3d at p. 564 (Goleta Valley).)

Bibend v. Liverpool & London Fire & Life Insurance

30 Cal. 78 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1866

According to Lord Chancellor King, in Lynch v. Dalzell, 4 Brown, 431, and Lord Chancellor Hardwick, in Sadlers’ Co. v. … (Mitchell v. Winslow, 2 Story, 639 ; Wright v. Wright, 1 Ves. 409, 411.)

People v. King

115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 214 · California Supreme Court · Jan 10, 2002

Both People v. … WE CONCUR: GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ.

People v. Stewart

16 Cal. 3d 133 · California Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1976

(See People v. Clancy (1960) 184 Cal.App.2d 403, 406-407 [ 7 Cal.Rptr. 532 ]; People v. Proctor (1959) 169 Cal.App.2d 269, 276 [ 337 P.2d 93 ]; People v. … (People v. St. Martin, supra, 1 Cal.3d 524, 532 ; and see People v.

McKee v. Cal. Annual Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church

166 Cal. 409 · California Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1913

(Kenaday v. Sinnott, 179 U. S. 618 , [ 45 L. Ed. 339 , 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 233].) In Tifft v. Porter, 8 N. … In Gelbach v.

Gutierrez v. Tostado

California Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2025

This statute establishes the default rule that each person has a duty ‘to exercise, in his or her activities, reasonable care for the safety of others.’ ” (Brown v. … Brown proclaimed that the “cost of medical malpractice insurance has risen to levels which many physicians find intolerable.” (Governor’s Proclamation to Leg. (May 16, 1975) Stats. 1975, 2d Ex.

Millbrae Co. v. Taylor

4 Cal. Unrep. 714 · California Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1894

Dec. 557 ; Fetridge v. Wells, 13 How. Pr. (N. Y.) 385; Hobbs v. Francais, 19 How. Pr. (N. Y.) 571; Manhattan Medicine Co. v. Wood, 108 U. S. 218 , 27 L. Ed. 706 , 2 Sup. Ct. Rep. 436. In Siegert v. … Labrot, 8 Fed. 29 , and Huwer v. Dannenhoffer, 82 N. Y. 499 . In Atlantic Milling Co. v.

People v. Rogers

5 Cal. 3d 129 · California Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1971

(Bruce v. Gregory (1967) 65 Cal.2d 666, 673-674 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 265 , 423 P.2d 193 ]; Silver v. Brown (1966) 63 Cal.2d 841, 845-846 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 ], and cases cited.) … (Richfield Oil Corp. v. Crawford (1952) 39 Cal.2d 729, 736 [ 249 P.2d 600 ] [administrative construction]; Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service Commrs. (1942) 21 Cal.2d 399, 402 [ 132 P.2d 804 ] [judicial construction].)

People v. Robarge

41 Cal. 2d 628 · California Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1953

(People v. Knutte, 111 Cal. 453, 455 [ 44 P. 166 ]; People v. … (See People v. Sarazzawski, 27 Cal.2d 7, 15-16 [ 161 P.2d 934 ]; People v. Navarro, 74 Cal.App.2d 544, 553-555 [ 169 P.2d 265 ]; People v. Bacos, 14 Cal.App.2d 338, 348-349 [ 58 P.2d 221 ]; cf. People v.

People v. Skiles

51 Cal. 4th 1178 · California Supreme Court · Jun 27, 2011

(Ibid.; Young v. … Name of Opinion People v.

People v. O'BRIEN

71 Cal. 2d 394 · California Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1969

We affirm the judgment as to guilt but, under compulsion of Witherspoon v. … We begin with defendant’s contention- that under the standard adopted in Maine v.

Toward Utility Rate Normalization v. Public Utilities Commission

22 Cal. 3d 529 · California Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1978

Brown and Christopher Lee Rasmussen for Real Parties in Interest. OPINION RICHARDSON, J. … Decision No. 87584 invalidates the extension of time and at the same time acknowledges the Commission's error in ordering an across-the-board waiver of regrade charges.

In re Glass

58 Cal. 4th 500 · California Supreme Court · Jan 27, 2014

We ask whether the applicant is fit to practice law, paying particular attention to acts of moral turpitude (Kwasnik v. … (Hallinan v. Committee of Bar Examiners (1966) 65 Cal.2d 447, 452 (Hallinan).)

Carstens v. Pillsbury

172 Cal. 572 · California Supreme Court · May 22, 1916

As was said in Western Metal Supply Co. v. … In Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v.