Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscal

10,000+ results

1.95s

  • People v. Broad

    216 Cal. 1 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1932

    In Traffic Truck Sales Co. v. … E. 794 ]; Lacey v. Lemmons, 22 N. M. 54 [L. R. A. 1917A, 1185, 157 Pac. 949 ]; Stillwater Board of Education v. Eldredge, 13 Okl. 205 [ 73 Pac. 1104 ] ; Boggs v. Commonwealth, 76 Va. 989 .

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Meininger v. Gluckauf

    1 Cal. Unrep. 113 · California Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1864

    People, 18 Wend. 89 ; Ex parte Noon, 1 Denio, 645 ; Commonwealth v. Judges, etc., 3 Binn. (Pa.) 273; Commonwealth v. Cochran, 5 Binn. (Pa.) 103; Swing v. Inhabitants of Alloway’s Creek, 10 N. J. … L. (5 Halst.) 58; County Court v. Daniel, 2 Bibb (Ky.), 573.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lawrence v. Gayetty

    78 Cal. 126 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1889

    Jur., secs. 877, 888; Neidefer v. Chastain, 71 Ind. 363 ; 36 Am. Hep. 198; Welshbillig v. … (Kinder v. Macy, 7 Cal. 206 ; Meeker v. Harris, 19 Cal. 278 ; Capuro v. Builders’ Ins. Co., 39 Cal. 123 .) But the facts are pleaded here. The material facts necessary to show actionable fraud are: 1.

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • Bockrath v. Aldrich Chemical Co.

    21 Cal. 4th 71 · California Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1999

    (Ibid.; Dunn v. Dufficy, supra, 194 Cal. at p. 386 ; see also Tucker v. … Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., Brown, J., and Epstein, J., * concurred. Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied October 6, 1999.

    Cited 76 timesPublished
  • Haman v. County of Humboldt

    8 Cal. 3d 922 · California Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1973

    Co. v. … In Carmichael v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Estate of Mitchell

    10 Cal. 2d 628 · California Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1938

    In Attorney General v. State Board of Judges, 38 Cal. 291, 296 , the word was referred to as signifying an enclosure or assemblage of fruit or nut-bearing trees”. … Webster’s definition of “an enclosure containing fruit trees” was adopted in Wright v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • LOS ANGELES CTY. METRO. TRANSP. v. Continental Dev.

    16 Cal. 4th 694 · California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1997

    Bacich v. Board of Control (1943) 23 Cal.2d 343, 349 [ 144 P.2d 818 ] ( Bacich ).) … Board of Control, supra, 23 Cal.2d 343, 349 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • O'Connor v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen

    146 Cal. 484 · California Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1905

    Co. v. Simmons, 49 Neb. 811 , cases cited; Fitch v. American Life Ins. Co., 59 N.Y. 566 ; 1 Price v. Phoenix M. Ins. Co., 17 Minn. 497 ; 2 Muller v. Mutual Ben. L. Ins. Co., 3 Iowa, 228 ; 3 Jennings v. … Co. v. Brown, 57 Miss. 308 ; 1 Piedmont etc. Ins. Co. v. Ewing, 92 U.S. 377 ; Clapp v. Massachusetts Ben. Assn., 146 Mass. 526 .)

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Himmelmann v. Steiner

    38 Cal. 175 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1869

    As remarked in the case of Taylor v. … (See, also, Smith v. Davis, 30 Cal. 537 .)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People v. Garcia

    85 Cal. Rptr. 2d 280 · California Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1999

    BROWN, J.—I respectfully dissent. This case asks the age-old question: does judicial commitment to principle matter? The majority gives the modern answer. … (Ibid.\ see also People v. Superior Court (Alvarez), supra, 14 Cal.4th at p. 980 .)

    Cited 225 timesPublished
  • City of San Jose v. Superior Court

    12 Cal. 3d 447 · California Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1974

    (Eastlick v. City of Los Angeles (1947) 29 Cal.2d 661, 667 [ 177 P.2d 558 , 170 A.L.R. 225 ]; Jackson v. Board of Education (1967) 250 Cal.App.2d 856, 859 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 763 ].) … City Board of Education (1959) 173 Cal.App.2d 126, 129 [ 343 P.2d 170 ]; Ghiozzi v. City of South San Francisco (1946) 72 Cal.App.2d 472, 476 [ 164 P.2d 902 ]; Eppstein v. City of Berkeley (1942) 52 Cal.

    Cited 416 timesPublished
  • People v. Williams

    121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 854 · California Supreme Court · Jul 15, 2002

    Opinion BROWN, J. A jury convicted defendant of driving while under the influence. … (People v. Harris (1989) 47 Cal.3d 1047, 1094 [ 255 Cal.Rptr. 352 , 767 P.2d 619 ], citing People v. Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 144 , 549 P.2d 1240 ].)

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Garcia v. Industrial Accident Commission

    41 Cal. 2d 689 · California Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1953

    Brown, Attorney General, Irving H. Perluss, Assistant Attorney General, William L. Shaw and Vincent P. Lafferty, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondents. *691 SCHAUER, J. … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • People v. LeBeau

    39 Cal. 2d 146 · California Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1952

    Brown, Attorney General, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, J. Frank Coakley, District Attorney (Alameda), and Vernon L. Goodin, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent. GIBSON, C.J. … (See People v. Jacobs, 49 Cal. 384 ; People v. DeWitt, 68 Cal. 584, 588 [ 10 P. 212 ]; People v. Wallace, 89 Cal. 158, 164 [ 26 P. 650 ]; People v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • In Re the Estate of Loucks

    160 Cal. 551 · California Supreme Court · Aug 23, 1911

    (Joseph v. Seward, 91 Ala. 597 , [ 8 South. 682 ]; Taylor v. Diploch, 2 Phillim. Eccl. Rep. 261; Mason v. Mason, 1 Meriv. 308; Underwood v. King, 19 Beav. 459, and on review 4 De G. M. & G. 633; Wing v. Angrave, 8 H. L. … Loucks was sitting on the floor of the automobile with his hands over the dash board. His body was wedged in. On the side of his head he had an injury.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • People v. Virgil

    51 Cal. 4th 1210 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 2011

    (People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 576.) … (People v. Ward, supra, 36 Cal.4th at p. 222; People v. Brown, supra, 33 Cal.4th at pp. 403-404.)

    Cited 265 timesPublished
  • Yates v. Smith

    38 Cal. 60 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1869

    In Treadway v. Semple, and Semple v. Wright (supra), we held, on the authority of Rodrigues v. … In Fremont v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • The Atkins Corporation v. Tourny

    6 Cal. 2d 206 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1936

    It was said in State v. … That such power exists is evidenced *217 by the ease of Brown v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irr. Dist., 183 Cal. 186 [ 190 Pac. 797 ], where a bond was ordered to be physically restored.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Regents of University of California

    4 Cal. 4th 843 · California Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1993

    Detroit Board of Education (1977) 431 U.S. 209 [ 52 L.Ed.2d 261 , 97 S.Ct. 1782 ] ( Abood ) and Keller v. … As the Supreme Court in the landmark case of Board of Education v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Dabney v. Philleo

    37 Cal. 2d 672 · California Supreme Court · Aug 22, 1951

    (Guardianship of Vucinich (1935), 3 Cal.2d 235, 243 [ 44 P.2d 567 ]; see also Wilkerson v. Seib (1942), 20 Cal.2d 556, 562 [ 127 P.2d 904 ]; Stratton v. … (Estate of Rolls.(1924), 193 Cal. 594, 599 [ 226 P. 608 ]; see, also, Brown v.

    Cited 56 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.