Case law

Faus v. City of Los Angeles

67 Cal. 2d 350 · California Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1967

In Anderson v. … It is more convenient to the public, in that it can pull up to the curbing so that passengers may board or alight without crossing a part of the street. . . .

Bennett v. Wilson

122 Cal. 509 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1898

In Foorman v. … (Clark v. Fowler, 5 Allen, 46.) See other instances cited in note to Downs v. Fuller, supra. Downs v. Fuller, supra, is cited approvingly in Pierce v.

People v. MacIel

57 Cal. 4th 482 · California Supreme Court · Aug 8, 2013

(See Brown v. Sanders (2006) 546 U.S. 212, 220, 223–224; People v. … (People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 563.) 6.

People v. Roberge

129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 861 · California Supreme Court · Feb 6, 2003

Recently, in People v. … J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., Brown, J., and Moreno, J., concurred.

People v. Union Oil Co.

48 Cal. 2d 476 · California Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1957

(White v. Lyons, 42 Cal. 279, 284 ; see Gregory v. State, supra, 32 Cal.2d 700, 702 .) … (Aebli v. Board of Education, 62 Cal.App.2d 706, 725 [ 145 P.2d 601 ]; see also 70 C.J.S. § 156, p. 365.) This appears to be such a ease.

J. C. Penney Casualty Insurance v. M. K.

52 Cal. 3d 1009 · California Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1991

(Delaney v. Superior Court (1990) 50 Cal.3d 785, 798 [ 268 Cal.Rptr. 753 , 789 P.2d 934 ].) To determine that intent, “ ‘The court turns first to the words themselves for the answer.’ ” (Brown v. … (Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co., supra, 48 Cal.3d 711, 740-742 ; Delaney v. Superior Court, supra, 50 Cal.3d 785, 799, fn. 9 .)

Thompson v. Cook

20 Cal. 2d 564 · California Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1942

(See Thompson v. Johnson, 60 Cal. 292 ; Rheinhart v. Lugo, 86 Cal. 399 [ 21 Am. St. Rep. 52 , 24 Pac. 1089 ]; Witter v. Bachman, 117 Cal. 319 [ 49 Pac. 202 ]; Woodward v. Brown, 119 Cal. 304 [ 63 Am. St. … (Hill v. City Cab etc. Co., 79 Cal. 188 [ 21 Pac. 728 ]; People v. Harrison, 107 Cal. 541 [ 40 Pac. 956 ].)” In Akley v.

People v. Wright

28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 708 · California Supreme Court · May 26, 2005

BROWN, J. … V.

Smith v. City of San Luis Obispo

95 Cal. 463 · California Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1892

In New Orleans v. … In Stone v. Brooks, 35 Cal. 497 , it was said: “ There does not seem to be any necessity for a formal acceptance by some particular board of officers.

Contra Costa Coal Mines Railroad v. Moss

23 Cal. 323 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

(Gilmer v. Lime Point, 19 Cal. 47 ; Gilbert v. Columbia T. Co., 3 Johns. Cas. 107 ; Adams v. Saratoga & Wash. R. R. Co., 10 N. Y. 328 .) … (Mokelumne Hill Canal Co. v. Woodbury, 14 Cal. 265 ; McAuley v. York Mining Co., 6 Id. 80; Wolf v. St. Louis Independent Water Co., 15 Id. 319.)

Cook v. Ceas

143 Cal. 221 · California Supreme Court · May 11, 1904

Among the cases bearing upon this point, the following may be referred to: Graff v. Mesmer, 52 Cal. 636 ; Trumpler v. Cotton, 109 Cal. 250 ; Reither v. Murdock, 135 Cal. 197 ; Allen v. Tiffany, 53 Cal. 16 ; Chaquette v. … (See Estate of Blythe, 99 Cal. 472 ; Naftzger v. Gregg, 99 Cal. 83 ; 1 Story *Page 227 v. Story etc. Co., 100 Cal. 41 ; Brown v.

People v. Cochran

121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 595 · California Supreme Court · Jul 11, 2002

People v. … (Reno v.

Clark v. Oxner

190 Cal. 278 · California Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1923

(Perkins v. Simonds, supra; Kelly’s Heirs v. McGuire, supra; Den v. Searing, 8 N. J. L. 340; Conkling v. Brown, 57 Barb. [N. Y.] 265, 276; Amy v. Amy, 12 Utah, 278 [ 42 Pac. 1121 ]; Cox v. … In Rowley v.

Sutter Hospital v. City of Sacramento

39 Cal. 2d 33 · California Supreme Court · May 14, 1952

(See Mayor & Common Council of Borough of Princeton v. State Board of Taxes & Assessments, 96 N.J.L. 334 [ 115 A. 342, 344 ] ; Buxton Country Day-School, Inc. v. … The case of Young Men’s Christian Assn. v.

People v. Bryant

207 Cal. 450 · California Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1929

(Smith v. People, supra; State v. Moorhouse, 5 N. D. 406, 407-411 [ 67 N. W. 140 ]; State v. Joyce, 307 Mo. 49 [ 269 S. W. 623, 625 ]; Golden Valley County v. Lundin, 52 N. D. 420 [ 203 N. W. 317, 319 ].; Hogg v. … Board of Commrs., 57 Colo. 463 [ 141 Pac. 478 , 480]; Parshall v. State, 62 Tex. Cr. 177 [ 138 S. W. 759, 764 ]; Attorney-General v. Duncan, 76 N. H. 11 [ 78 Atl. 925, 927 ]; Indianapolis Union Ry. Co. v.

MacKintosh v. Agricultural Fire Ins. Co.

150 Cal. 440 · California Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1907

Edward Brown & Sons, General Agents.” At the time this permission was given the six-ton smelter was on the premises, but it was not mentioned or described in the policy. … Co. v. Knight, 197 Ill. 190 , [ 64 N. E. 339 ]; Hanover Fire etc. Co. v. Dole, 20 Ind. App. 333 , [ 50 N. E. 772 ] ; Home Ins. *448 Co. v. Gibson, 72 Miss. 53 , [ 17 South. 13 ]; Wilson v. Commercial Ins. Co., 51 S.

Beyerbach v. Juno Oil Co.

42 Cal. 2d 11 · California Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1954

As held in Cohen v. … Co. v.

People v. Manzo

53 Cal. 4th 880 · California Supreme Court · Mar 8, 2012

(People v. … Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W.

People v. Diaz

3 Cal. 4th 495 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1992

(People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at p. 541 ; People v. Allen (1986) 42 Cal.3d 1222, 1277 [ 232 Cal.Rptr. 849 , 729 P.2d 115 ].) … Defendant relies on federal cases stressing the importance of such findings (United States v. Brown (7th Cir. 1983) 716 F.2d 457 ; United States v. Livingston (3d Cir. 1972) 459 F.2d 797 ).

Haman v. County of Humboldt

8 Cal. 3d 922 · California Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1973

Co. v. … In Carmichael v.