Case law

County of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

30 Cal. 3d 391 · California Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1981

(Los Angeles Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com. (Jones) (1934) 2 Cal.App.2d 614, 615 [ 38 P.2d 828 ]; Board of Education v. Indus. Acc. Com. (Stout) (1934) 3 Cal.App.2d 411, 414 [ 39 P.2d 521 ].) … (Evans) (1934) 2 Cal.App.2d 641 [ 38 P.2d 850 ]; Board of Education v. Indus. Acc. Com. (Stout) (1934) supra, 3 Cal.App.2d 411 ; State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Indus. Acc. Com.

State Department of Corrections v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

5 Cal. 3d 885 · California Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1971

The same section of this treatise points out that the board has applied section 4553 to governmental agencies. (McDowell v. State Dept. of Highways (1939) 4 Cal.Comp.Cases 144; San Diego v. … (Carter v. Agricultural Ins.

Southern California Telephone Co. v. State Board of Equalization

12 Cal. 2d 127 · California Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1938

Moller, Inc., v. … Petitioner relies on our decision in General Pipe Line Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 5 Cal. (2d) 253 [ 54 Pac. (2d) 18 ].

Santa Fe Transportation Co. v. State Board of Equalization

51 Cal. 2d 531 · California Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1959

Defendant board relies on the case of Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. … Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1948), 89 Cal.App.2d 267, 270 [ 200 P.2d 573 ], where the court said: “We find no merit in this contention.

Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. Contractors' State License Board

39 Cal. 2d 561 · California Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1952

has adopted a regulation, rule 732, which subdivides all specialty contracting work into 31 classes and requires a separate license to perform each class of work. 2 The board has informed plaintiff that all general engineering … (Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeToth, 26 Cal.2d 753, 762 [ 161 P.2d 217 , 162 A.L.R.747].) The judgment is reversed. Shenk, J., Carter, J., Traynor, J., Schauer, J., and Spence, J., concurred. Bus. & Prof.

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

67 Cal. 2d 925 · California Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1967

Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com. … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Elliott) (1952) 39 Cal.2d 529, 535 [ 247 P.2d 707 ].)

Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. State Board of Equalization

63 Cal. 2d 222 · California Supreme Court · Aug 19, 1965

McCutchen, Doyle, Brown, Trautman & Enersen, John N. Hauser and Frederick H. Stone for Plaintiff and Appellant. Bert W. Levit, Victor B. … Co. v. State Board of Equalization (Cal.App.) 40 Cal.Rptr. 773 . NOTES [fn. 1] 1.

Ontario Community Foundation, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

35 Cal. 3d 811 · California Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1984

(See Hotel Del Coronado Corp. v. State Board of Equalization (1971) 15 Cal.App.3d 612 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 456 ].) … The case provides no support for the notion that the Board can adopt a regulation which contravenes the statutory change. Nor is Sutter Packing Co. v.

Myers v. Board of Supervisors of Alameda County

60 Cal. 287 · California Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1882

The petitioner was elected a member of the Board at the general election in September, 1878, for the term of three years commencing October 6,1878. … Under the late Constitution and the statute thereunder, the power to appoint to fill a vacancy in a Board of Supervisors was with the County Judge. In Leonard v.

Pacific Pipeline Construction Co. v. State Board of Equalization

49 Cal. 2d 729 · California Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1958

Co. v. … Co. v. California State Board of Equalization, 137 Cal.App.2d 87, 95 [ 290 P.2d 20 ], involved about 900 sales totaling about $100,000 during a 15-year period.

Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of Glendale

15 Cal. 3d 328 · California Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1975

Board of Education (1912) 18 Cal.App. 222 [ 122 P. 967 ] (mandate to compel officials to approve payment); cf. Flora Crane Service, Inc. v. … “While mandamus will not lie to control the discretion exercised by a public officer or board ... it will lie to correct an abuse of discretion by such officer or board.” (Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v.

California Compensation & Fire Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

68 Cal. 2d 157 · California Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1968

The Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter board) found that Mrs. … (Scott v. Pacific Coast Borax Co. (1956) 140 Cal.App.2d 173, 178 [ 294 P.2d 1039 ].) The board properly relied upon Madin v. Industrial Acc.

McMahon v. Board of Supervisors of San Mateo County

46 Cal. 214 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1873

.: This is an application by the Board of Trustees of the First or San Bruno Township, of San Mateo County, for a writ of mandate to compel the Board of Supervisors of said county to issue bonds for the improvement of roads … The petition then alleges that the election was held, at which a majority of the votes cast were in favor of the proposition; but the Board of Supervisors, nevertheless, refuses to issue the bonds.

Voices of the Wetlands v. State Water Resources Control Board

52 Cal. 4th 499 · California Supreme Court · Aug 15, 2011

Thus, in Ashford v. … In Sierra Club v.

Maxwell v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County

3 Cal. Unrep. 782 · California Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1893

It has been held in the case of Journal Publishing Co. v. … calling for proposals from those wishing to do such work; but the contract for advertising is to be made by the proper officer, and for a price not exceeding that fixed by the board of supervisors.

California Portland Cement Co. v. State Board of Equalization

67 Cal. 2d 578 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1967

Plaintiff does not question the Board’s right to subpoena information in its equalization survey (see Redding Pine Mills, Inc. v. … Here, however, there is no showing that the Board proposes or intends to make improper use of the information it seeks. (See County of Riverside v. Palm-Ramon Dev. Co., supra, 63 Cal. 2d 534, 539 [2] ; Kaiser Co. v.

County of San Bernardino v. State Board of Equalization

172 Cal. 76 · California Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1916

In Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. … For example, in San Diego & Arizona Railway Co. v. State Board of Equalisation, 165 Cal. 561 , [ 132 Pac. 1044 ], the use and not merely the kind of property governed our conclusion that it was “operative.”

Miller v. Chico Unified School District Board of Education

24 Cal. 3d 703 · California Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1979

(See Bekiaris v. Board of Education (1972) 6 Cal.3d 575, 592-594 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 16 , 493 P.2d 480 ]; Bonham v. McConnell (1955) 45 Cal.2d 304 [ 288 P.2d 502 ]; see also Mt. Healthy City Board of Ed v. … Cole v.

Accounting Corp. of America v. State Board of Accountancy

34 Cal. 2d 186 · California Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1949

(See Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Exam., 216 Cal. 285 [ 14 P.2d 67 ]; People v. Merchants Protective Corp., 189 Cal. 531 [ 209 P. 363 ]; Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. … Stats. (1947) ch. 135.06(3); Wangerin v. Wisconsin State Board of Accountancy, 223 Wis. 179 [ 270 N.W. 57 ].)

George Arakelian Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

49 Cal. 3d 1279 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1989

(DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 179-180 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ].) … (See People v.