Case law

Turlock Irrigation Dist. v. White

186 Cal. 183 · California Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1921

(Weill v. Kenfield, 54 Cal. 113 .) ” Other instances of its application may be found in Miller v. Dunn, 72 Cal. 462 -465, [ 1 Am. St. Rep. 67 , 14 Pac. 27 ]; Towle v. … Board of Regents, 163 Cal. 705 , [ 126 Pac. 974 ], and cases cited.) Reference may also be made to Central Irr. Dist. v. De Lappe, 79 Cal. 351 , [ 21 Pac. 825 ], and Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dist. v.

People v. Murphy

36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 125 · California Supreme Court · Nov 28, 2005

(People v. Flores, supra, 128 Cal.App.3d 512, 521 .) This echoed an identical statement in Brown v. Superior Court (1973) 34 Cal.App.3d 539, 543 [ 110 Cal.Rptr. 107 ]. … The Courts of Appeal in both Flores and Brown cited in support of this proposition our decision in People v. Rosales, supra, 68 Cal.2d 299, 302 , but we said nothing of the kind in Rosales .

Beyerbach v. Juno Oil Co.

42 Cal. 2d 11 · California Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1954

As held in Cohen v. … Co. v.

Klopping v. City of Whittier

8 Cal. 3d 39 · California Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1972

Co. v. … Foster v.

California Welfare Rights Organization v. Brian

11 Cal. 3d 237 · California Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1974

(See, e.g., Pearson v. State Social Welfare Board, 54 Cal.2d 184, 210 [ 5 Cal.Rptr. 553 , 353 P.2d 33 ]; City of Los Angeles v. Rancho Homes, Inc., 40 Cal.2d 764, 770-771 [ 256 P.2d 305 ]; Coca-Cola Co. v. … J., McComb, J., Mosk, J., Clark, J., Devine, J., * and Molinari, J.,* concurred. 1 Accord Parks v. Harden, 354 F.Supp. 620 ; Alcala v. Burns, 362 F.Supp. 180 ; Doe v. Lukhard, 363 F.Supp. 823 ; Wilson v.

People v. California Fish Co.

166 Cal. 576 · California Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1913

(Mayrhofer v. Board, 89 Cal. 112 , [ 23 Am. St. Rep. 451 , 26 Pac. 646 ].) … Kimball v. Macpherson, and People v.

Runo v. Williams

162 Cal. 444 · California Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1912

Mannheimer, 24 Minn. 193 ]; Sparling v. Conway, 75 Mo. 510 ; Turner v. O’Brien, 5 Neb. 542 ; McKown v. Hunter, 30 N. Y. 625; White v. Tucker, 16 Ohio St. 468 . … Brown, 68 Mo. 627 , the direct question asked of defendant was whether he acted in good faith in making the charge, and in Sherburne, Admr. etc. v. Rodman, 51 Wis. 479 , [ 8 N.

Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission

26 Cal. 2d 286 · California Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1945

Industrial Com., 167 Wis. 630 [ 167 N.W. 749 ]; see: Brown v. Vacuum Oil Co., 171 La. 707 [ 132 So. 117 ]; Industrial Com. v. Weigandt, 102 Ohio St. 1 [ 130 N.E. 38 ].) … Co. v.

Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.

35 Cal. 3d 498 · California Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1984

(See, e.g., Earp v. Nobmann (1981) 122 Cal.App.3d 270, 293-294 [ 175 Cal.Rptr. 767 ]; Howard v. Schaniel (1980) 113 Cal.App.3d 256, 267-268 [ 169 Cal.Rptr. 679 ]; Manning v. … Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 104, 112 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 901 ]; Vanguard Recording Society, Inc. v. Fantasy Records, Inc. (1972) 24 Cal.App.3d 410, 419 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 826 ].)

Gibson v. Kennedy Extension Gold Mining Co.

172 Cal. 294 · California Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1916

section 2 of the act, the proper signal for hoisting at slow speed from the 950 to the eight hundred foot level would have been 2-2 (the signal designating the eight hundred foot level), followed by 3 (indicating man on board … disqualification of parties as witnesses has been removed by our law, and the plaintiff, in testifying to the signals given, was giving evidence which was not in a legal sense "weaker" than that of any other eyewitness. ( People v.

Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.

35 Cal. 2d 409 · California Supreme Court · May 12, 1950

Board of Trustees, 64 Cal.App.2d 197, 204, 205 [ 148 P.2d 405 ], hearing denied; Dennis v. Gonzales, 91 Cal.App.2d 203 [ 205 P.2d 55 ].) … (Scholey v. Steele, 59 Cal.App.2d 402 [ 138 P.2d 733 ]; Anthony v. Hobbie, 25 Cal.2d 814 [ 155 P.2d 826 ]; Stockwell v. Board of Trustees, 64 Cal.App.2d 197 [ 148 P.2d 405 ].)

People v. Crowey

56 Cal. 36 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

In the case of Erwin v. … In the case of The People v.

People v. Izaguirre

42 Cal. 4th 126 · California Supreme Court · Aug 16, 2007

(See People v. Pearson (1986) 42 Cal.3d 351 [ 228 Cal.Rptr. 509 , 721 P.2d 595 ] (Pearson).) The holding in Sloan is consistent with this court’s recent decision in People v. … (Brown v. Ohio (1977) 432 U.S. 161, 165 [ 53 L.Ed.2d 187 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 ], italics added.)

People v. Staten

101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 213 · California Supreme Court · Nov 9, 2000

In People v. … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

People v. Miller

50 Cal. 3d 954 · California Supreme Court · May 21, 1990

(Compare People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 536-537 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ], vacated sub nom. California v. … (P eople v. Melton, supra, 44 Cal.3d at p. 761; People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at p. 544, fn 17 .)

City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

196 Cal. 445 · California Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1925

Bird, 60 Cal. 372, 375 , and Lassen v. Board of Dental Examiners, 24 Cal. App. 767, 770 [ 142 Pac. 505 ]. … The case of Green v. City of Los Angeles, 65 Cal.

Bianka M. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.

236 Cal. Rptr. 3d 610 · California Supreme Court · Aug 16, 2018

Hartenstine v. … Name of Opinion Bianka M. v.

Tannhauser v. Adams

31 Cal. 2d 169 · California Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1947

In other instances, the land involved was exempt from the “tax” for which it had been sold (see Hutchison v. Brown (1917), 66 Okla. 250 [ 167 P. 624 ]; Taylor v. … In Meigs v.

Ball v. Rawles

93 Cal. 222 · California Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1892

(Stone v. … Johnstone v. Sutton, 1 Term Rep. 545, is also a leading case on this subject, having been determined in the court of exchequer chamber, and afterwards affirmed in the house of lords. (1 Brown Parl. C. 76.)

Canfield v. County of Los Angeles

157 Cal. 617 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1910

(American Coal Co. v. Allegany County, *621 59 Md. 185 ; Dwight v. Boston, 12 Allen, 316 , [ 90 Am. Dec. 149 ]; Nevada Bank v. Sedgwick, 104 U. S. 111 , [ 26 L. Ed. 703 ]; Kelley v. Rhodes, 7 Wyo. 237 , [ 75 Am. St. … In Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee, 161 U. S. 146 , [16 Sup.