Case law

Rinaldi v. Goller

48 Cal. 2d 276 · California Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1957

State Board of Equalization, 12 Cal.2d 127 [ 82 P.2d 422 ].) “. . . in distinguishing permanence from transitoriness, it is not necessary to identify *280 it with perpetuality. ’ ’ (Trabue Pittman Corp. v. … Co. v. Cann, 129 Cal.App.2d 272 [ 276 P.2d 858 ]; Glaser v. North’s, supra, 201 Ore. 118 ; Donahue v. Hardman Estate, supra, 91 Wash. 125 ; Shelton v.

Discover Bank v. Superior Court

30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 76 · California Supreme Court · Jun 27, 2005

Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. … Smith (Ala. 1998) 727 So.2d 9, 20 ; Rains v. Foundation Health Systems (Colo.Ct.App. 2001) 23 P.3d 1249, 1253-1254 ; Brown v. KFC National Management Co. (1996) 82 Haw. 226 [ 921 P.2d 146, 166, fn. 23 ]; Rosen v.

Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc.

California Supreme Court · Jan 18, 2024

(Weil & Brown, Cal. … Koepke for Board of Trustees of the California State University as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant. Munger, Tolles & Olson, Malcolm A. Heinicke, Katherine M.

City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conservation District

226 Cal. Rptr. 3d 51 · California Supreme Court · Dec 4, 2017

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180.) The Legislature is, of course, free to impose additional requirements by statute. … We disapprove Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency v. Amrhein (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1364, and Griffith v.

People v. Lapara

181 Cal. 66 · California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1919

The murderer fired the fatal shot while standing on the running-board of the truck, and then fled. The defendant was identified as the slayer of Alioto by the direct testimony of two witnesses. … (Jones on Evidence, sec. 291; People v. McCrea, 32 Cal. 98 ; People v. Ah Yute, 53 Cal. 614 ; People v. Louie Fou, 112 Cal. 24 , [ 44 Pac. 453 ]; People v. Mallon, 103 Cal. 513 , [ 37 Pac. 512 ]; People v.

Riverside Cement Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

35 Cal. 2d 328 · California Supreme Court · May 2, 1950

. *329 In the fall of 1942, at the request of the United States War Production Board, Riverside Cement Company (referred to as Riverside), reopened its plant near Oro Grande. … City of Vernon v. Southern Calif. Gas Co., Dec. No. 21860, 34 C.R.C. 46 (Dec. 1929), and Batchelder-Wilson Co. v. Southern Calif. Gas Co., Dec.

Taylor v. Hill

115 Cal. 143 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1896

(Spanagel v. Dellinger, 38 Cal. 278 ; Brison v. Brison, 90 Cal. 326 .) 2. … (Cole v. Superior Court, 63 Cal. 86 ; 49 Am. Rep. 78 ; People v. New York Common Pleas, 11 Wend. 166 .) And it was held in the case of Carter v. Green Mountain etc. Min.

People v. DeSantis

2 Cal. 4th 1198 · California Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1992

Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ], *1241 reversed on another ground sub nom. California v. … We reversed the judgment of death in light of federal decisions and People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d 512 . (45 Cal.3d at pp. 256-257.)

Calaway v. State Bar of California

41 Cal. 3d 743 · California Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1986

The recommendation was approved by the State Bar disciplinary board. In 1977, this court agreed that the acts involved moral turpitude and that disbarment was the appropriate sanction. … Justice Tobriner’s opinion for this court in Hall v.

Swoap v. Superior Court

10 Cal. 3d 490 · California Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1973

In County of San Mateo v. … Seemingly to the contrary are Garcia v. Superior Court (1941) 45 Cal.App.2d 31 . . . and Kelley v. State Board of Social Welfare (1947) 82 Cal.App. 2d 627 ....

Minifie v. Rowley

187 Cal. 481 · California Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1921

(Biddel v. Brizzolara, 56 Cal. 374, 382 ; Pierce v. Merrill, 128 Cal. 473, 476 , [ 79 Am. St. Rep. 63 , 61 Pac. 67 ] ; Powell v. Petch, 166 Cal. 329 , [ 136 Pac. 55 ].) … (Pena v. Vance, 21 Cal. 142 ; Concannon v. Smith, 134 Cal. 14, 20 , [ 66 Pac. 40 ].)

Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission

26 Cal. 2d 286 · California Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1945

Industrial Com., 167 Wis. 630 [ 167 N.W. 749 ]; see: Brown v. Vacuum Oil Co., 171 La. 707 [ 132 So. 117 ]; Industrial Com. v. Weigandt, 102 Ohio St. 1 [ 130 N.E. 38 ].) … Co. v.

Pacific Rolling Mill Co. v. Riverside & Arlington Railway Co.

90 Cal. 627 · California Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1891

Our title comes through a sheriff’s sale under execution and order or decree of court in the case of V. S. Runnels & Sons et al. v. J. A. Studebecker et al., superior court of San Bernardino County. … (Wristen v. Bowles, 82 Cal. 84 ; Pomeroy on Specific Performance, secs. 58, 63, and authorities there cited.)

Holladay v. Frisbie

15 Cal. 630 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1860

In Smith v. … It is true, that the case of Smith v.

Little Sespe Consolidated Oil Co. v. Bacigalupi

167 Cal. 381 · California Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1914

Co. v. Lawrence, 55 Cal. 143 ; 1 Lindley on Mines, secs. 216, 217; Sparks v. Pierce, 115 U. S. 408 , [ 29 L. Ed. 428 , 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 102]; Atherton v. Fowler, 96 U. S. 513 , [ 24 L. Ed. 732 ]; Haws v. … Such entry must always be peaceable, open and above board, and made in good faith, or no right can be founded upon it.”

LaMar v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

218 Cal. 252 · California Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1933

We may in the outset repeat what was said in Sherman v. … (Brison v. Brison, 90 Cal. 334 , [ 27 Pac. 186 ].) ” (See, also, Coyle v. Coyle, 212 Cal. 715 [ 300 Pac. 5 ].)

Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.

193 Cal. 413 · California Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1924

Co. v. Mulray, 67 Ind. … Board of Park Commr., 94 Conn. 7 [ 107 A. 611 ]; State Road Commr. v. Industrial Acc. Com. of Utah, 56 Utah, 252 [ 190 P. 544 ]; Moore v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 169 App. Div. 177 [154 N Y Supp. 620].)

Petition of Los Angeles Trust Co.

158 Cal. 603 · California Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1910

(See Misch v. Mayhew, 51 Cal. 514 ; Hannah v. Green, 143 Cal. 19 , 21, [ 76 P. 708 ]; Wilson v. His Creditors, 55 Cal. 476 ; Dean v. Grimes, 72 Cal. 442 , [ 14 P. 178 ]; Hagenmeyer v. … Board of Equalization, 82 Cal. 214 , [ 23 P. 14 ]; Bates v. Howard, 105 Cal. 182 , [ 38 P. 715 ]; Bellmer v. Blessington, 136 Cal. 3 , [ 68 P. 111 ].)

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

62 Cal. 2d 634 · California Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1965

Civil Aeronautics Board (1949) 336 U.S. 601 [ 69 S.Ct. 756 , 93 L.Ed. 911 ], also involved payment by the government for mail carriage, but under a statute authorizing the board to fix reasonable rates therefor and "to make … Board of Public Utility Comrs. v. New York Tel. Co. (1926) 271 U.S. 23, 31-32 [ 46 S.Ct. 363 , 70 L.Ed. 808 ], and New Rochelle Water Co. v.

Whitfield v. Jessup

31 Cal. 2d 826 · California Supreme Court · May 6, 1948

American Manufacturing Co. v. United States Shipping Board, etc., 7 F.2d 565 (C.C.A. 2); cf. Truslow & Fulle, Inc. v. Diamond Bottling Co., supra [ 112 Conn. 181 ( 151 A. 492 , 71 A.L.R. 1142 )].” … (See, Hazelton v. First Nat. Stores, supra; Johnson v. Kanavos, supra; Ace Engineering *831 Co. v. West Bend Malting Co., 244 Wis. 91 [ 11 NW.2d 627 ]; Baum v. Murray, supra.)