Case law

In Re Ralph

27 Cal. 2d 866 · California Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1946

(People v. Ralph (1944), 24 Cal.2d 575, 583 [ 150 P.2d 401 ].) … (See People v. Ralph (1944), supra, 24 Cal.2d 575, 581, 582 .)

California Improvement Co. v. Moran

128 Cal. 373 · California Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1900

(Donnelly v. Tillman, 47 Cal. 40 ; Reis v. Graff, 51 Cal. 86 ; Grimm v. O’Connell, 54 Cal. 522 ; Shipman v. Forbes, 97 Cal. 572 ; Perine v. Forbush, 97 Cal. 305 ; California Imp. Co. v. Quinchard, 119 Cal. 87 .) 3. … (Dougherty v. Coffin, 69 Cal. 454 ; Heft v. Payne, 97 Cal. 108 ; Manning v. Den, 90 Cal. 610 .) The case of Spaulding v. North etc.

People v. Thomas

27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 2 · California Supreme Court · Jun 8, 2005

In Esteybar v. … J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., Brown, J., and Moreno, J., concurred.

People v. Pearson

56 Cal. 4th 393 · California Supreme Court · Mar 21, 2013

Box [, supra,] 23 Cal.4th [at p.] 1203; see Delaware v. Van Arsdall, supra, 475 U.S. at p. 679).‖ (People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 544-545 (Brown).) … .‖ (Brown, supra, 31 Cal.4th at p. 545.)

City of Culver City v. Superior Court

38 Cal. 2d 535 · California Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1952

Brown, Attorneys General, and Bayard Rhone, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. SCHAUER, J. … (Norris v.

In Re Martinez

131 Cal. Rptr. 2d 921 · California Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2003

Opinion BROWN, J. The Penal Code provides that inmates in county jails and state prisons may have their sentences reduced as a reward for their conduct, including work and good behavior. … In People v.

People v. Butler

31 Cal. 4th 1119 · California Supreme Court · Dec 1, 2003

Opinion BROWN, J. … Boyle v.

People v. Butler

6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 730 · California Supreme Court · Dec 1, 2003

Opinion BROWN, J. … Boyle v.

Rinaldi v. Goller

48 Cal. 2d 276 · California Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1957

State Board of Equalization, 12 Cal.2d 127 [ 82 P.2d 422 ].) “. . . in distinguishing permanence from transitoriness, it is not necessary to identify *280 it with perpetuality. ’ ’ (Trabue Pittman Corp. v. … Co. v. Cann, 129 Cal.App.2d 272 [ 276 P.2d 858 ]; Glaser v. North’s, supra, 201 Ore. 118 ; Donahue v. Hardman Estate, supra, 91 Wash. 125 ; Shelton v.

United Real Estate & Tr. Co. v. Barnes

159 Cal. 242 · California Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1911

(Reay v. Butler, 69 Cal. 580 , [ 11 Pac. 463 ]; Marriner v. Dennison, 78 Cal. 212 , [20 Pac. 386]; Holton v. Noble, 83 Cal. 9 , [ 23 Pac. 58 ]; London etc. Co. v. Liebes, 105 Cal. 207 , [38 *247 Pac. 691]; Morrison v. … There was an exception to this rule in the case of inferior boards or tribunals, of whose determinations no review was provided. (Ibid.)

Discover Bank v. Superior Court

30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 76 · California Supreme Court · Jun 27, 2005

Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. … Smith (Ala. 1998) 727 So.2d 9, 20 ; Rains v. Foundation Health Systems (Colo.Ct.App. 2001) 23 P.3d 1249, 1253-1254 ; Brown v. KFC National Management Co. (1996) 82 Haw. 226 [ 921 P.2d 146, 166, fn. 23 ]; Rosen v.

People v. Hagen

80 Cal. Rptr. 2d 24 · California Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1998

(Holmes v. McColgan (1941) 17 Cal.2d 426, 430 [ 110 P.2d 428 ]; Rihn v. Franchise Tax Board (1955) 131 Cal.App.2d 356, 360 [ 280 P.2d 893 ].) … J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. Hereafter former section 19405(a)(1). All further unspecified statutory references are to the Revenue and Taxation Code.

City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conservation District

226 Cal. Rptr. 3d 51 · California Supreme Court · Dec 4, 2017

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180.) The Legislature is, of course, free to impose additional requirements by statute. … We disapprove Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency v. Amrhein (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1364, and Griffith v.

Riverside Cement Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

35 Cal. 2d 328 · California Supreme Court · May 2, 1950

. *329 In the fall of 1942, at the request of the United States War Production Board, Riverside Cement Company (referred to as Riverside), reopened its plant near Oro Grande. … City of Vernon v. Southern Calif. Gas Co., Dec. No. 21860, 34 C.R.C. 46 (Dec. 1929), and Batchelder-Wilson Co. v. Southern Calif. Gas Co., Dec.

Calaway v. State Bar of California

41 Cal. 3d 743 · California Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1986

The recommendation was approved by the State Bar disciplinary board. In 1977, this court agreed that the acts involved moral turpitude and that disbarment was the appropriate sanction. … Justice Tobriner’s opinion for this court in Hall v.

Swoap v. Superior Court

10 Cal. 3d 490 · California Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1973

In County of San Mateo v. … Seemingly to the contrary are Garcia v. Superior Court (1941) 45 Cal.App.2d 31 . . . and Kelley v. State Board of Social Welfare (1947) 82 Cal.App. 2d 627 ....

Minifie v. Rowley

187 Cal. 481 · California Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1921

(Biddel v. Brizzolara, 56 Cal. 374, 382 ; Pierce v. Merrill, 128 Cal. 473, 476 , [ 79 Am. St. Rep. 63 , 61 Pac. 67 ] ; Powell v. Petch, 166 Cal. 329 , [ 136 Pac. 55 ].) … (Pena v. Vance, 21 Cal. 142 ; Concannon v. Smith, 134 Cal. 14, 20 , [ 66 Pac. 40 ].)

Butcher v. Vaca Valley & Clear Lake Railroad

67 Cal. 518 · California Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1885

In Ryan v. N. Y. C. R. … (Sheldon v. Hudson River, supra; Piggatt v. Eastern Counties, 3 Com. B. 229.) As was said in Henry v. S. P. R. R.

Holladay v. Frisbie

15 Cal. 630 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1860

In Smith v. … It is true, that the case of Smith v.

LaMar v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

218 Cal. 252 · California Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1933

We may in the outset repeat what was said in Sherman v. … (Brison v. Brison, 90 Cal. 334 , [ 27 Pac. 186 ].) ” (See, also, Coyle v. Coyle, 212 Cal. 715 [ 300 Pac. 5 ].)