Case law

People v. Parker

California Supreme Court · May 19, 2022

The trial court suggested the prosecution prepare a photo board of those images and at further hearings, the parties continued to discuss the images to be included on the prosecution’s photo boards, with defendant renewing … In addition to the photos and photo boards introduced at trial, and the prosecution’s opening and closing statements, 38  PEOPLE v.

Palermo L. W. Co. v. Railroad Commission

173 Cal. 380 · California Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1916

(Thayer v. California D. Co., 164 Cal. 117 , [ 128 Pac. 21 ]; Burr v. Maclay R. W. Co., 160 Cal. 268 , [ 116 Pac. 715 ]; Hildreth v. Montecito *384 etc. Co., 139 Cal. 22 , [72 Pac. 395]; Barton v. Riverside W. … (Smith v. Worn, 93 Cal. 212 , [ 28 Pac. 944 ]; Currier v. Howes, 103 Cal. 431 , [ 37 Pac. 521 ] ; People v. Southern Pacific Co., 172 Cal. 692 , [ 158 Pac. 180 ].)

People v. Collins

195 Cal. 325 · California Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1925

Plyler, 121 Cal. 160 [ 53 P. 553 ]; People v. Diaz, 6 Cal. 248 ; People v. McCrory, 41 Cal. 458 ; People v. Lee, 2 Cal. Unrep. 569 [ 8 P. 685 ]; Graham v. State, 50 Ark. 161 , 167 [ 6 S.W. 721 ]; Newton v. … This court, citing People v. McCrory, supra, People v. Dodge, 28 Cal. 445 , and People v. Brown, 46 Cal. 103 , held that the delay was not unreasonable. The other cases cited by appellant are not in point here.

Schwartz-Torrance Inv. v. Bakery & Confectionery Wrks. Un.

61 Cal. 2d 766 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1964

Thus in Hughes v. … In the light of this conclusion we need not consider defendant's contention that jurisdiction to intervene in this dispute resides exclusively in the National Labor Relations Board.

Security Pacific National Bank v. Wozab

51 Cal. 3d 991 · California Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1990

In Walker v. … (See Woodward v. Brown, supra, 119 Cal. 283, 291-295 ; Bank of America v. Daily, supra, 152 Cal.App.3d 767, 772-773 .) Contrary to the majority’s suggestion, nothing in this court’s decision in Walker v.

O. L. Shafter Estate Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

175 Cal. 522 · California Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1917

On his return to the house of Palascini brothers, with whom he boarded, and at about 1 o’clock P. … (North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm., 174 Cal. 357 , [ 163 Pac. 910 ].)

McClung v. Employment Development Department

20 Cal. Rptr. 3d 428 · California Supreme Court · Nov 4, 2004

(People v. Savala (1981) 116 Cal.App.3d 41, 55-61 [ 171 Cal.Rptr. 882 ]; People v. Harvey (1980) 112 Cal.App.3d 132, 138-139 [ 169 Cal.Rptr. 153 ]; People v. … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

Smith v. Industrial Accident Commission

44 Cal. 2d 364 · California Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1955

Brown, Attorney General, Gerald A. Carrera, Deputy Attorney General, Everett A. Corten and T. Groezinger for Respondents. SCHAUER, J. … Co. v. Pillsbury (1915), 170 Cal. 767, 768 [ 151 P. 419 ]; Frankfort General Ins. Co. v. Pillsbury (1916), supra, 173 Cal. 56, 57 ; Mercury Aviation Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Donovan v. RRL Corp.

109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 807 · California Supreme Court · Sep 12, 2001

Co. v. … V The judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed. Kennard, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

Mervyn Investment Co. v. Biber

184 Cal. 637 · California Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1921

The corporation did, through its board of directors, assume to exercise this power and for a time operated the business conjointly with Biber. … (Braun v. Woollacott, 129 Cal. 107 , [ 61 Pac. 801 ]; Davis v. Megroz, 35 N. J.

Mercury Herald Co. v. Moore

22 Cal. 2d 269 · California Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1943

The precise problem involved in this case was recently considered by the Supreme Court of Michigan (Baker v. State Land Office Board (1940), 294 Mich. 587 [ 293 N.W. 763 ]). … See Muir-head v. Sands, 111 Mich. 487 , 69 N.W. 826 ; Board of Supervisors v. Hubinger, 137 Mich. 72 , 100 N.W. 261 , Ann. Cas. 792; Harsha v. City of Detroit, 261 Mich. 586 , 246 N.W. 849 , 90 A.L.R. 853 .”

Gish v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

13 Cal. 2d 570 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1939

manner as to cause her severe and grievous physical and mental suffering. ’ ’ On the trial of the action, concerning the manner in which the accident occurred, in substance, the said plaintiff testified that after she had “boarded … (Newson v. Hawley, 205 Cal. 188 [ 270 Pac. 364 ].) ” To the same effect, see McCurrie v.

Spellens v. Spellens

49 Cal. 2d 210 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1957

Brown (1952), 39 Cal.2d 622, 630 [8] [ 248 P.2d 922 ]; Zaragosa v. … (See Brown v. Gosser (1953, Ky.), 262 S.W.2d 480, 484 , 43 A.L.R.2d 626 , 631.) Recovery of Attorney’s Fees incurred in the Claim and Delivery Action as Damages in the Cross-Action for Abuse of Process.

In Re Scott

52 Cal. 3d 968 · California Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1991

(Young v. … In Furey v.

Donaldson v. National Marine, Inc.

25 Cal. Rptr. 3d 584 · California Supreme Court · Mar 14, 2005

A more recent high court case, Howlett v. … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Brown, J., and Moreno, J., concurred.

Matter of Application of Richardson

170 Cal. 68 · California Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1915

(See County of Plumas v. Wheeler, 149 Cal. 764 , [ 87 Pac. 909 ].) … The ease of Seattle v. Denchor, 58 Wash. 501 , [137 Am St. Rep. 1076, 28 L. R. A. (N.

Imperial Ice Co. v. Rossier

18 Cal. 2d 33 · California Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1941

In California the case of Boyson v. … In California Grape Control Board v. California Produce Corp., 4 Cal.

Salcido v. Roberts

6 Cal. Unrep. 856 · California Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1902

Upon the canvass of the returns, the board of supervisors certified that appellant had received 252, and respondent 250, votes, and officially declared appellant to have been elected. … Every positive requirement of the statute which, if disobeyed, would defeat its object, must be held mandatory: Tebbe v. Smith, supra; Lauer v. Estes, 120 Cal. 653 , 53 Pac. 262 .

People v. Perry

42 Cal. Rptr. 3d 30 · California Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2006

(Smith, supra, 35 Cal.4th at p. 369; see People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 541 [ 230 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 726 P.2d 516 ].) … S-4718-01, S4783 (1992); People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 403-404 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ].)

People v. Lapara

181 Cal. 66 · California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1919

The murderer fired the fatal shot while standing on the running-board of the truck, and then fled. The defendant was identified as the slayer of Alioto by the direct testimony of two witnesses. … (Jones on Evidence, sec. 291; People v. McCrea, 32 Cal. 98 ; People v. Ah Yute, 53 Cal. 614 ; People v. Louie Fou, 112 Cal. 24 , [ 44 Pac. 453 ]; People v. Mallon, 103 Cal. 513 , [ 37 Pac. 512 ]; People v.