Case law

People v. Roberts

65 Cal. 2d 514 · California Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1966

(People v. Terry, 57 Cal.2d 538, 559-560 [ 21 Cal.Rptr. 185 , 370 P.2d 985 ]; People v. Griffin, 98 Cal. App.2d 1, 49-50 [26] [ 219 P.2d 519 ]; People v. Chapman, 91 Cal.App.2d 854, 857 [3] [ 206 P.2d 4 ].) In People v. … In People v.

People v. Seumanu

61 Cal. 4th 1293 · California Supreme Court · Aug 24, 2015

Brown, 479 U.S. 538, 545 (1987) (O‘Connor, J., concurring). … Phelps [(1988)] 484 U.S. [231] at p. 246; accord, California v. Brown (1987) 479 U.S. 538, 541.)

Eltinge v. Santos

171 Cal. 278 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1915

On the tenth day of July, 1906, and before the incorporation of the city of Turlock, the board of supervisors of the county of Stanislaus accepted and published an official map of that county. … (City of Los Angeles v. Kysor, 125 Cal. 466 , [ 58 Pac. 90 ]; City of Anaheim v. Langenberger, 134 Cal. 608 , [ 66 Pac. 855 ].)

In Re Gilliam

26 Cal. 2d 860 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1945

The distinction is further clarified in People v. … (People v. Nicholson, 34 Cal.App.2d 327 [ 93 P.2d 223 ]; In re Boatwright, 216 Cal. 677 [ 15 P.2d 755 ]; People v. Dawson, 210 Cal. 366 [ 292 P. 267 ]; People v. Birdsell, 6 Cal.App.2d 749 [ 45 P.2d 378 ].)”

Pickens v. Johnson

42 Cal. 2d 399 · California Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1954

It was held in the case of Knight v. Board of Administration of State Emp. R. … (Pickens v. Johnson, 107 Cal.App.2d 778 [ 238 P.2d 40 ].)

People v. Hagen

80 Cal. Rptr. 2d 24 · California Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1998

(Holmes v. McColgan (1941) 17 Cal.2d 426, 430 [ 110 P.2d 428 ]; Rihn v. Franchise Tax Board (1955) 131 Cal.App.2d 356, 360 [ 280 P.2d 893 ].) … J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. Hereafter former section 19405(a)(1). All further unspecified statutory references are to the Revenue and Taxation Code.

People v. Antick

15 Cal. 3d 79 · California Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1975

The home needed landscaping and repairs and defendant agreed to do this work in exchange for room, board and a small salary, ranging from $50 to $200 per month. … In People v.

Roche v. Baldwin

135 Cal. 522 · California Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1902

Holmes v. … Canal Co. v.

Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.

180 Cal. 348 · California Supreme Court · May 9, 1919

It was said in Kohler v. … (Blanc v. Paymaster Mining Co., supra.) [7] 3.

Spinks v. Clark

147 Cal. 439 · California Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1905

Francisco; and the second being certain alleged representations as to the value of the stock, its dividend-producing capacity, the freedom of the corporation from debt, and that the quoted value of the stock upon the stock board … The case of Burke v.

Bulmash v. Davis

24 Cal. 3d 691 · California Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1979

Proc., § 473; Brown v. Aguilar (1927) 202 Cal. 143, 149 [ 259 P. 735 ].) The judgment is affirmed. Bird, C. … (Hamilton v. Bell (1898) 123 Cal. 93, 95 [ 55 P. 758 ]; Clark v. Superior Court (1918) 37 Cal.App. 732,734 [ 174 P. 681 ].) We discussed the rationale for this rule nearly a century ago in Loveland v.

City of Petaluma v. White

152 Cal. 190 · California Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1907

(Ede v. Johnson, 15 Cal. 53; Lutz v. Kinney, 23 Nev. 279 , [ 46 Pac. 257 ]; vol. 2 Century Digest, p. 27.) There was no such statutory requirement here. … Y. 135 ; Poole v. Breese, 114 Ill. 594 , [ 3 N. E. 714 ]; *196 Marling v. Burlington, 67 Iowa 331 , [ 25 N. W. 268 ].) Such an act is, of course, binding on his successor in interest.

Gottstein v. Kelly

206 Cal. 742 · California Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1929

Board of Equalization, 56 Cal. 194, 205 ; Emeric v. Alvarado, 64 Cal. 529, 605 [ 2 Pac. 418 ]; Allen v. McKay & Co., 120 Cal. 332, 334 [ 52 Pac. 828 ]; Hall v. … (Jacoby v. Wolff, 198 Cal. 667 [ 247 Pac. 195 ]; Treadwell v.

Solomon v. Alexander

161 Cal. 23 · California Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1911

(Harding v. People, 10 Colo. 387 , [ 15 Pac. 727 ]; State ex rel, Churchhill v. Bemis, 45 Neb. 724 , [ 64 N. W. 348 ]; Mills v. State Board etc., 135 Mich. 525 , [ 98 N. W. 19 ].)

Wright v. Broadway Department Store

199 Cal. 562 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1926

In the case of Ensign v. Southern Pac. … (Ensign v. Southern Pac. Co., 193 Cal. 311, 322 [ 223 Pac. 953, 957 ].)

People v. Comingore

20 Cal. 3d 142 · California Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1977

(People v. Camden (1976) 16 Cal.3d 808, 815 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 438 , 548 P.2d 1110 ]; People v. Stephenson (1974) 10 Cal.3d 652, 661 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 556 , 517 P.2d 820 ]; People v. … (People v. Ruster (1976) 16 Cal.3d 690, 696 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 153 , 548 P.2d 353 ]; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].)

In Re Scaggs

47 Cal. 2d 416 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1956

Brown, Attorney General, and Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent. GIBSON, C.J. … is not correct to say that '[i]t always has been the law in this state that the discretion referred to in section 1272 of the Penal Code ... is not a discretion conferred upon the appellate courts,' as stated in People v.

California Welfare Rights Organization v. Brian

11 Cal. 3d 237 · California Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1974

(See, e.g., Pearson v. State Social Welfare Board, 54 Cal.2d 184, 210 [ 5 Cal.Rptr. 553 , 353 P.2d 33 ]; City of Los Angeles v. Rancho Homes, Inc., 40 Cal.2d 764, 770-771 [ 256 P.2d 305 ]; Coca-Cola Co. v. … J., McComb, J., Mosk, J., Clark, J., Devine, J., * and Molinari, J.,* concurred. 1 Accord Parks v. Harden, 354 F.Supp. 620 ; Alcala v. Burns, 362 F.Supp. 180 ; Doe v. Lukhard, 363 F.Supp. 823 ; Wilson v.

Strang v. Cabrol

37 Cal. 3d 720 · California Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1984

(Cory v. Shierloh (1981) 29 Cal.3d 430, 437-441 [ 174 Cal.Rptr. 500 , 629 P.2d 8 ].) … When we, in Vesely v. Sager (1971) 5 Cal.3d 153, 167 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 623 , 486 P.2d 151 ], overruled such cases as Cole v. Rush (1955) 45 Cal.2d 345 [ 289 P.2d 450 ] and Lammers v.

Western Ass'n of Short Line R.R. v. R.R. Comm'n

173 Cal. 802 · California Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1916

Exempli gratia, in Georgia Railway Power Co. v. … of Railroad Commrs. v.